Frihed og lykke i Rousseaus retfærdiggørelse af staten
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/spf.v3i1.6166Keywords:
Rousseau, politisk teori, kollektiv lykke, autonomi, retfærdighed, KantAbstract
Political philosophers tend to think that Rousseau is significant because his contractarianism anticipates Kant. However, reading Rousseau in this way requires us to ignore his frequent and emphatic appeals to the role of happiness as collective flourishing (eudaimonia) in establishing the rational authority of justice. I offer a reading of Rousseau’s political theory which accounts for this eudaimonistic aspect of his thought. I argue that for Rousseau, as for Kant, obligations are structured by the autonomous willing of agents who bind themselves by the norms of reason alone. But unlike Kant, Rousseau thinks that such formal considerations of rational autonomy provide necessary but not sufficient reasons for fulfilling our duties to one another. This is because the ultimate reason for valuing individual autonomy is that it enables the flourishing of individuals insofar as they are members of a just political community.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The author(s) and the journal share the Copyright, and must both be credited when using (e.g. quoting from or distributing) published material. Articles published in Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi (Studies in Philosophy of Education) may be used (downloaded) and reused (distributed, copied, cited) for non-commercial purposes with reference to the authors and publication host. Manuscripts submitted to Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi may not have been previosly published - however, Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi does allow for its published articles to be published in other journals by the author, after approval from the editors. Articles may be uploaded in institutional repositories if the author is required to so as part of a grant or institutional requirement.