Lost in Translation-the Practice of Decoupling Work Environment Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.170525Keywords:
Health, Working Environment & Wellbeing, Organization & ManagementAbstract
Although companies and top managers claim that the work environment is a high priority, implementing such policies across organizational levels remains a challenge. In this regard, the Greenlandic labor market is no exception. Using the concept of decoupling as a theoretical lens, our in-depth case study of four major Greenlandic companies reveals where and how decoupling occurs during the translation of work environment priorities from top management to practice at the operational level.
Our contribution is twofold: First, we advance decoupling theory by showing how it unfolds through micro-mechanisms with policy-practice decoupling at the top and means-ends decoupling at the local level. Micro-mechanisms which will be relevant in other contexts for work environment management as well as other fields. Second, we shed light on the unique challenges associated with work environment management in Greenland’s labor market. This nuanced understanding can help managers address these mechanisms and reduce the impact of decoupling.
Author Biographies
Søren Voxted, University of Southern Denmark
Associate Professor, Department of Business and Management
Anne Lise Kappel, University of Greenland
Assistant professor, Department of Artic Social Science and Economy
Peter Hasle, University of Southern Denmark
Professor, Department of Technology and Innovation
References
Aalders, M., & Wilthagen, T. (1997). Moving beyond command-and-control: Reflexivity in the regulation of occupational safety and health and the environment. Law & Policy, 19(4), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9930.t01-1-00034
Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2018). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis? Organization Studies, 40, 017084061877261. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084 0618772610
Aravind, D., & Christmann, P. (2011). Decoupling of standard implementation from certifi¬cation: Does quality of ISO 14001 implementation affect facilities’ environmental perfor¬mance? Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(1), 73–102. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20112114
Athanasopoulou, A., Marti, E., Risi, D., & Schlindwein, E. (2025). How companies restrain means–ends decoupling: A comparative case study of CSR implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 62(1), 214–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13043
Borys, D. (2012). The role of safe work method statements in the Australian construction industry. Safety Science, 50(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.010
Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolu¬tion and theoretical challenges. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 77–97). Sage Publication. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n4
Brandl, J., Keegan, A., & Kozica, A. (2022). When less is more: HRM implementation, legit¬imacy and decoupling. Human Resource Management Journal, 32(1), 247–260. https:// doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12388
Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi. org/10.1080/19416520.2012.684462
Brunsson, N. (2002). The Organization of Hypocrisy—Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations. CBS Press. https://samfundslitteratur.dk/bog/organization-hypocrisy
Departement for Sociale Anliggender, Familier, Arbejdsmarked og Indenrigsanliggender. (2024). Naalakkersuisut’s arbejdsmarkedsredegørelse 2023. https://naalakkersuisut.gl/ Nyheder/2024/06/2806_arbejdsmarkedsredegoerelse?sc_lang=da
Dick, P. (2015). From rational myth to self-fulfilling prophecy? Understanding the persistence of means–ends decoupling as a consequence of the latent functions of policy enactment. Organization Studies, 36(7), 897–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615575191
Dyreborg, J. (2011). ‘Safety Matters Have Become Too Important for Management to Leave it Up to the Workers’ – The Nordic OSH model between implicit and explicit frame¬works. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 1(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.19154/ njwls.v1i1.2339
Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). Case study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (Vol. 1, Issue 17, pp. 301–316). Sage.
Fredriksson, M., Pallas, J., & Wehmeier, S. (2013). Public relations and neo-institutional theory. Public Relations Inquiry, 2. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/20 46147X13485956
Frick, K. (1990). Can management control health and safety at work? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 11(3), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X90113005
Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Thematic coding and categorizing. In Analyzing Qualitative Data (pp. 38–55). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208574
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer, Eds). Sage Reference.
Guiette, A., & Vandenbempt, K. (2017). Change managerialism and micro-processes of sen¬semaking during change implementation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2017.02.002
Haig, B. D. (2005). An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371
Hallett, T. (2010). The myth incarnate: Recoupling processes, turmoil, and inhabited insti¬tutions in an urban elementary school. American Sociological Review, 75(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122409357044
Hasle, P., Limborg, H. J. H. J., Grøn, S., & Refslund, B. (2017). Orchestration in work envi¬ronment policy programs. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 7(3), 43–62. https:// doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v7i3.97092
Hasle, P., Limborg, H. J. H. J., & Nielsen, K. T. K. T. (2014). Working environment inter¬ventions: Bridging the gap between policy instruments and practice. Safety Science, 68, 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.02.014
Hasle, P., Madsen, C. U., & Hansen, D. (2021). Integrating operations management and occupational health and safety: The necessary future of safety science? Safety Science, 139, 105247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105247
Hengst, I.-A., Jarzabkowski, P., Hoegl, M., & Muethel, M. (2020). Toward a process theory of making sustainability strategies legitimate in action. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0960
Høgedahl, L., Ravn, R. L., & Frejlev, L. (2021). Den grønlandske arbejdskraftsundersøgelse. Center for Arbejdsmarkedsforskning (CARMA), Aalborg Universitet.
Howlett, M. (2003). Administrative styles and the Iimits of administrative reform: A neo-institutional analysis of administrative cuIture. Canadian Public Administration, 46(4), 471–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2003.tb01588.x
Hutchinson, B., Dekker, S., & Rae, A. (2022). Writing plans instead of eliminating risks: How can written safety artefacts reduce safety ? Safety Science, 151 (November 2021), 105738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105738
Jabbouri, R., Schneckenberg, D., & Truong, Y. (2022). From policy-practice to means-ends decoupling in organizations: A systematic review and paths for future research. Management International, 26(1), 123. https://doi.org/10.7202/1088440ar
Jabbouri, R., Schneckenberg, D., & Truong, Y. (2025). From policy-practice to means-ends decoupling in organizations: A systematic review and paths for future research. IDEAS Working Paper Series from RePEc. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2643838993?ac-countid=14211&cid=CID:20250627115606609:808506&fromOL=true&par-entSessionId=1mreIc%2BD0DGQkQcQkARwsfp9oAYASersYJ8%2FTgWP14s% 3D&sourcetype=Working%20Papers
Kappel, A. L., Hasle, P., & Voxted, S. (2026). Shifting responsibility to the workers – interpretations of work environment regulation in Greenlandic companies. Safety Science, 193, 107007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107007
Kappel, A. L., Hasle, P., Voxted, S., & Jesche, K. (2023). Occupational safety and health in Greenland – A chapter to be written? Arctic Yearbook. https://arcticyearbook.com/arc¬tic-yearbook/2023/2023-scholarly-papers/489-occupational-safety-and-health-in-green¬land-a-chapter-to-be-written
Kelling, N. K., Sauer, P. C., Gold, S., & Seuring, S. (2021). The role of institutional uncertainty for social sustainability of companies and supply chains. Journal of Business Ethics, 173(4), 813–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04423-6
King, N. (2004). Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. In Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research (pp. 11–22). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280119
Kongsvik, T., Gjøsund, G., & Vikland, K. M. (2016). HSE culture in the petroleum industry: Lost in translation? Safety Science, 81, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.04.019
Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and univer¬sity recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 29–56.
Mendoza, A., Liu, S.-N. C., Smith, A., Hendricks, J. W., Peres, S. C., & Sasangohar, F. (2024). The realities of procedure deviance: A qualitative examination of divergent work-as-done and work-as-imagined perspectives. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 100, 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103564
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook: Vol. 2. [BOOK]. SAGE Publications.
Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4308154
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., Buchanan, D., & Akin, G. (2021). Managing Organizational Change: A Multiple Perspectives Approach. McGraw Hill. https://www.mheducation. com/highered/product/managing-organizational-change-multiple-perspectives-ap¬proach-palmer-dunford/M9781260043716.html
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic Evaluation. Sage.
Powell, W. W., & Rerup, C. (2017). Opening the black box: The microfoundations of institu¬tions. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 311–335). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526415066
Resch, K., & Enzenhofer, E. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Collection. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070
Roulston, K., & Choi, M. (2018). Qualitative interviews. In The SAGE Handbook of Quali-tative Data Collection (pp. 233–249). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/ 9781526416070
Rud, S. (2017). Toward a postcolonial Greenland: Culture, identity, and colonial legacy. In S. Rud (Ed.), Colonialism in Greenland: Tradition, Governance and Legacy (pp. 119–144). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46158-8_7
Stål, H. I., & Corvellec, H. (2022). Organizing means–ends decoupling: Core–compartment separations in fast fashion. Business & Society, 61(4), 857–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 00076503211001856
Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018- 0171-7
Thompson, J. (2022). A guide to abductive thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(5), 1410–1421. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5340
Vo, L.-C. (2016). Microfoundations of decoupling: From a coping theory perspective. M@n@gement, 248–276.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
Wijen, F. (2014). Means versus ends in opaque institutional fields: Trading off compliance and achievement in sustainability standard adoption. The Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 302–323.
Wiseman, A. W. (2022). Recent developments in the relationship between empirical compar¬ative research on education and neo-institutional theory. Internationales Jahrbuch Der Erwachsenenbildung, 45(1), 15–38.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author/Authors
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
