‘An offer you can refuse’: Municipal Activation from the Employers’ Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.167556Keywords:
Employment, Wages, Unemployment & RehabilitationAbstract
The Nordic welfare states have a long history of local-level activation to combat unemployment. This study explored how employers perceive and experience the function of municipal activation and its participants. We carried out interviews with 277 Swedish employers. Most employers did not perceive municipal activation centers as a relevant collaboration, though they widely accepted the idea that activation is a constructive method to increase employability. Municipal activation centers are the principal actors behind activation, but many employers perceive themselves as bearing the greater proportion of risk and responsibility. Engaging in activation requires employer resources that rarely lead to subsequent hiring. In the recruitment of low-wage labor, applicants’ behavioral traits and motivation are what matter most to employers.
References
Alford, R., & Friedland, R. (1985). Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Birkelund, G. E. (2016). Rational laziness: When time is limited, supply abundant, and decisions have to be made, Analyse & Kritik. Zeitschrift für Sozialtheorie 38: 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2016-0110
Bode, I. (2013). Processing institutional change in public service provision, Public Organization Review 13(3): 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-012-0201-z
Bonoli, G. (2016). Europe’s social safety net under pressure, Current History 115(779): 102–107. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48614149
Borghouts, I., & Freese, C. (2023). HRM and social security: It takes two to create a transi¬tional labour market. In: Ingold, J., & McGurk, P. (eds.), Employer Engagement – Making Active Labour Market Policies Work (pp. 182–200). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bredgaard, T., & Halkjær, J. L. (2016). Employers and the implementation of active labour market policies, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 6(1): 47–59. https://doi. org/10.19154/njwls.v6i1.4909
Bredgaard, T. (2018). Employers and active labour market policies: Typologies and evidence, Social Policy and Society 17(3): 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474641700015X
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Clasen, J., Clegg, D., & Goerne, A. (2016). Comparative social policy analysis and active labour market policy: Putting quality before quantity, Journal of Social Policy 45(1): 21–38. doi: 10.1017/S0047279415000434
Dalal, D. K., Diab, D. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2015). “I heard that … : Do rumors affect hiring decisions?”, International Journal of Selection and Assessment 23(3): 224–236. https:// doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12110
Dall, T., Larsen, F., & Madsen, B. M. (2023). Opening the black box: Promoting employer engagement at the street level of employment services. In: Ingold, J., & McGurk, P. (eds.), Employer Engagement – Making Active Labour Market Policies Work (pp. 106–125). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Dequech, D. (2008). Logics of justification and logics of action, Journal of Economic Issues 42(2): 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507162
Ds 2024:29 (2024). Aktivitetskrav inom försörjningsstödet – för arbete, egenförsörjning och nationell likformighet. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.
Govender, L. (2023). Crumbs from the Rich Man’s Table? Municipal Labour Market Policies and Recognition of Welfare Recipients in Sweden. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.
Green, A., & Sissons, P. (2023). The weakest link? Job quality and active labour market pol¬icy in the UK. In: Ingold, J., & McGurk, P. (eds.), Employer Engagement – Making Active Labour Market Policies Work (pp. 87–105). Bristol: Bristol University Press. https://doi. org/10.51952/9781529223026.ch006
Forslund, A., Wasah, P.-E., Ulmestig, R., Vikman, U., Waernbaum, I., Westerberg, A., & Zetterqvist, J. (2019). Kommunal arbetsmarknadspolitik. Vad och för vem? Uppsala: IFAU Rapport 2019:5.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing the society back in. In: Powell, W. W., & Di Maggio, P. J. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 232–267). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics’ corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system, Journal of Management Studies 42: 1031–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00531.x
Hanson, W., & Moore, J. (2023). Conditions, processes and pressures promoting inclusive organizations. In: Ingold, J., & McGurk, P. (eds.), Employer Engagement – Making Active Labour Market Policies Work (pp. 201–216). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Hasluck, C., & Green, A. E. (2007). What works for whom? A review of the evidence and meta-analysis for the Department for Work and Pensions, DWP Research Report 407. Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
Herbst, A., & Benjamin, O. (2016). Between activation and supporting women – Alternative operation of welfare-to-work programmes, Social Policy & Administration 50(5): 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12112
Hyggen, C., & Vedeler, J. (2021). Employer engagement and active labour market policies. Evidence from a Norwegian multi-method study, Social Policy and Society 20(4): 548–560. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746420000421
Ingold, J. (2020). Employers’ perspectives on benefit conditionality in the UK and Denmark. Social Policy & Administration 54(2): 236–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12552
Ingold, J., & McGurk, P. (2023). Employer Engagement: Making Active Labour Market Policies Work. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Ingold, J., Knox, A., Macaulay, L., & Senewiratne, S. (2023). ‘What about me?’: An analysis of employers’ engagement
with employment service providers in Australia, Journal of Industrial Relations 65(3): 251–273.
Jacobsson, K., Hollertz, K., & Garsten, C. (2017). Local worlds of activation: The diverse pathways of three Swedish municipalities, Nordic Social Work Research 7(2): 86–100. doi: 10.1080/2156857X.2016.1277255
Koch, M. (2017). Roads to Post-Fordism: Labour Markets and Social Structures in Europe. Routledge: Aldgate.
Larsen, C. A., & Vesan, P. (2012). Why public employment services always fail: Double-sided asymmetric information and the placement of low-skill work in six European countries, Public Administration 90(2): 466–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02000.x
Liechti, F., Fossati, F., Bonoli, G., & Auer, D. (2017). The signaling value of labor market pro¬grams, European Sociological Review 33: 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw061
Lødemel, I., & Trickey, H. (2000). `An Offer You Can’t Refuse’ — Workfare in International Perspective. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Moore, J., Hanson, W., & Gustafson, T. (2023). Practice case study: Sephora’s journey to an inclusive workplace and the ‘Let Us Belong’ philosophy. In: Ingold, J., & McGurk, P. (eds.), Employer Engagement- Making Active Labour Market Policies Work (pp. 217–230). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Mörk, E., Ottosson, L., & Vikman, U. (2022). To work or not to work? Effects of tempo¬rary public employment on future employment and benefits. IZA Discussion Paper No. 15071, SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4114615
Novick, G. (2008). Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research? Research in Nursing & Health 31(4): 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20259
OECD (2021). Building inclusive labour markets: Active labour market policies for the most vulnerable groups, OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/607662d9-en.
Orton, M., Green, A., Atfield, G., & Barnes, S. A. (2019). Employer participation in active labour market policy: From gatekeepers to proactive strategic partners, Journal of Social Policy 48(3): 511–528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941800060
Panican, A., & Johansson, H. (2016). Strategies against poverty in a social democratic local welfare system: Still the responsibility of public actors? In: Johansson, H., & Panican, A. (eds.), Combating Poverty in Local Welfare Systems (pp. 155–177). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Parsland, P. (2025). Ojämlikhetsregimer i aktivering. Görande av klass, etnicitet och kön genom subventionerade anställningar. Doctoral dissertation in Social Work, Lund University.
Raffass, T. (2017). Demanding activation, Journal of Social Policy 46(2): 349–365. doi: 10.1017/S004727941600057X
Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics, Organization Studies 30(6): 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609104803.
SBU (2022). Effekter av arbetsmarknadsinsatser för personer med varaktigt försörjningsstöd (Effects of labor market interventions for people with long-term support). Stockholm: SBU.
Simms, M. (2017). Understanding employer engagement in youth labour market policy in the UK, Human Resource Management Journal 27(4): 548–564.
SKR Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (2024). Förutsättningar för ett välfungerande aktivitetskrav i praktiken (Prerequisites for a well-functioning activity demand in practice). Stockholm: SKR.
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy, Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
Swedish Research Council. (2017). Good Research Practice. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.
Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. In: The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (Vol. 0, pp. 17–36). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526405555
Thornton, P. H., Jones, C., & Kury, K. (2005). Institutional logics and institutional change in organizations: Transformation in accounting, architecture, and publishing, Research in the Sociology of Organizations 23: 125–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-558X (05)23004-5
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ulmestig, R., & Panican, A. (2021). Samverkan med konkurrerande kunskapsanspråk inom lokal aktiveringspolitik. Socialvetenskaplig tidskrift 28 (2): 145–166.
Van Belle, E., Stasio, V., Caers, R., Couck, M., & Baert, S. (2018). Why are employers put off by long spells of unemployment? European Sociological Review 34(6): 694–710. https:// doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcy039
Van Berkel, R., Ingold, J., McGurk, P., Boselie, P., & Bredgaard, T. (2017). Editorial introduc¬tion: An introduction to employer engagement in the field of HRM. ‘Blending social policy and HRM research in promoting vulnerable groups´ labour market participation, Human Resource Management Journal 27: 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12169
Van Berkel, R. (2021). Employer engagement in promoting the labour-market participation of jobseekers with disabilities. An employer perspective, Social Policy and Society 20(4): 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474642000038X
Van der Aa, P., & Van Berkel, R. (2014). Innovating job activation by involving employers, International Social Security Review 67(2): 11–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/issr.12036
Wiggan, J., & Knuth, M. (2023). Active labour market programmes and employer engagement in the UK and Germany. In: Ingold, J., & McGurk, P. (eds.), Employer Engagement- Making Active Labour Market Policies Work (pp. 126–144). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author/Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



