Balancing Optimism with Strategy: Leadership in Public Sector Automation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.161335Keywords:
Learning & Competencies, Innovation & Productivity, Organization & ManagementAbstract
This study explores leadership in public sector automation, considering how contextual characteristics in two Swedish municipalities interact with the evolution of leadership. Through qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with leaders and employees in elder care, we examine leadership skills and behaviors understood as crucial for implementing medicine robots. Grounded in reflexive thematic analyses, we present six themes: (1) Tech openness, (2) Optimism toward change, (3) Collaborative coordination, (4) Training and support, (5) Instrumental understanding, and (6) Operational feedback. The main findings illustrate how leadership skills, including cultivating optimism, engaging with technology and fostering collaboration, were considered essential. While proactive leadership was limited, knowledgeable and supportive leadership was apparent. Behaviors understood as supportive included communicating purpose and providing timely education. Leadership is vital in automation implementations, requiring skills to address complexities of human–technology interaction and balancing enthusiasm for automation with strategic foresight and deep understanding of the public sector context.
Author Biographies
Maria Forsgren, Umeå University
Doctoral student, Department of Psychology. E-mail: Maria.Forsgren01@umu.se
Susanne Tafvelin, Umeå University
Associate professor, Department of Psychology
Andreas Stenling, Umeå University
Associate professor, Department of Psychology
Ulrika Haake, Umeå University
Professor, Department of Education
References
Aarons, G.A., Ehrhart, M.G. & Farahnak, L.R. (2014a). The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership. Implementation Science 9(1): 45. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-45.
Aarons, G.A., Ehrhart, M.G., Farahnak, L.R. & Sklar, M. (2014b). Aligning Leadership Across Systems and Organizations to Develop a Strategic Climate for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation. Annual Review of Public Health 35(1): 255–274. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182447.
Alos-Simo, L., Verdu-Jover, A.J. & Gomez-Gras, J.-M. (2017). How transformational leadership facilitates e-business adoption. Industrial Management & Data Systems 117(2): 382–397. doi:10.1108/IMDS-01-2016-0038.
Andreasson, J., Ljungar, E., Ahlstrom, L., Hermansson, J. & Dellve, L. (2018). Professional Bureaucracy and Health Care Managers’ Planned Change Strategies: Governance in Swedish Health Care. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 8(1): 23-41. doi:10.18291/njwls.v8i1.104849.
Avolio, B.J., Kahai, S. & Dodge, G.E. (2000). E-leadership: implications for theory, research, and practice. The Leadership Quarterly 11(4): 615–668. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(00)00062-X.
Bass, B.M. and Riggio, R.E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. 2nd ed. New York: Psychology Press. doi:10.4324/9781410617095.
Braun, V. and Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: SAGE Publications.
Brunner, T.J., Schuster, T. & Lehmann, C. (2023). Leadership’s long arm: the positive influence of digital leadership on managing technology-driven change over a strengthened service innovation capacity. Frontiers in Psychology 14: 988808. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352.
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E. & Zampieri, R. (2019). The role of leadership in a digitalized world: a review. Frontiers in Psychology 10: 1938. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938.
Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science 17(1): 75. Doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0
Ertner, M. (2019). Enchanting, evoking, and affecting: the invisible work of technology implementation in homecare. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9: 33-47. doi:10.18291/njwls.v9iS5.112690.
EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work). (2024). Automation of cognitive and physical tasks in the health and social care sector: implications for safety and health: literature review. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2802/692689 (Accessed 24 March 2025).
European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2022). AI Watch. National strategies on Artificial Intelligence: A European perspective. 2022 edition https://ai-watch.ec.europa.eu/publications/ai-watch-national-strategies-artificial-intelligence-european-perspective-2022-edition_en (Accessed 26 March 2025).
Fasoli, A., Beretta, G., Pravettoni, G. & Sanchini, V. (2023). Mapping emerging technologies in aged care: results from an in-depth online research. BMC Health Services Research 23(1): 528. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09513-5.
Frennert, S. (2020). Approaches to welfare technology in municipal eldercare. Journal of Technology in Human Services 38(3): 226–246. doi:10.1080/15228835.2020.1747043.
Garkisch, M. & Goldkind, L. (2024). Considering a unified model of artificial intelligence enhanced social work: a systematic review. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work 10(1): 23–42. doi:10.1007/s41134-024-00326-y.
Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P. and Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly 82(4): 581–629. doi:10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x
Haake, U., Lindberg, O., Rantatalo, O., Grimm, F., Siljebo, J. & Bäck, T. (2023). Leadership in Swedish public organizations: a research review in education and care. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 13(2): 63–85 doi:10.18291/njwls.134896.
Imran, F., Shahzad, K., Butt, A. & Kantola, J. (2020). Leadership competencies for digital transformation: evidence from multiple cases. In: Kantola, J., Nazir, S. & Salminen, V. (Eds.). Advances in Human Factors, Business Management and Leadership. Cham: Springer International Publishing: 81–87. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50791-6_11.
Ingebrigtsen, T., Georgiou, A., Clay-Williams, R., Magrabi, F., Hordern, A., Prgomet, M., Li, J., Westbrook, J. & Braithwaite, J. (2014). The impact of clinical leadership on health information technology adoption: systematic review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 83(6): 393–405. doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.02.005.
Kajander-Unkuri, S., Vaismoradi, M., Katajisto, J., Kangasniemi, M. & Turjamaa, R. (2023). Effect of robot for medication management on home care professionals’ use of working time in older people’s home care: a nonrandomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Health Services Research 23(1): 1344. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-10367-0.
Kane, G.C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A.N., Kiron, D. & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/strategy-drives-digital-transformation/ (Accessed 26 March 2025).
Kangasniemi, M., Karki, S., Colley, N. & Voutilainen, A. (2019). The use of robots and other automated devices in nurses’ work: an integrative review. International Journal of Nursing Practice 25(4): e12739. doi:10.1111/ijn.12739.
Kelloway, E.K., Mullen, J. & Francis, L. (2006). Divergent effects of transformational and passive leadership on employee safety. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 11(1): 76–86. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.1.76.
Kolbjørnsrud, V., Amico, R. & Thomas, R.J. (2017). Partnering with AI: how organizations can win over skeptical managers. Strategy & Leadership 45(1): 37–43. doi:10.1108/SL-12-2016-0085.
Kuziemski, M. & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy 44(6): 101976. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976.
Lindgren, I. (2024). Ironies of automation and their implications for public service automation. Government Information Quarterly 41(4): 101974. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101974.
Lundmark, R., Hasson, H., Von Thiele Schwarz, U., Hasson, D. & Tafvelin, S. (2017). Leading for change: line managers’ influence on the outcomes of an occupational health intervention. Work & Stress 31(3): 276–296. doi:10.1080/02678373.2017.1308446.
Mosson, R., Hasson, H., Wallin, L. & von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2017). Exploring the role of line managers in implementing evidence-based practice in social services and older people care. The British Journal of Social Work 47(2): 542–560. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcw004.
Mosson, R., von Thiele Schwarz, U., Richter, A. & Hasson, H. (2018). The impact of inner and outer context on line managers’ implementation leadership. British Journal of Social Work 48(5): 1447–1468. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcx077
Mumford, M.D., Zaccaro, S.J., Harding, F.D., Jacobs, T.O. & Fleishman, E.A. (2000). Leadership skills for a changing world: solving complex social problems. The Leadership Quarterly 11(1): 11–35. doi:10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00041-7.
Nakrem, S., Solbjør, M., Pettersen, I.N. & Kleiven, H.H. (2018). Care relationships at stake? Home healthcare professionals’ experiences with digital medicine dispensers – a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research 18(1): 26. doi:10.1186/s12913-018-2835-1.
Nilsen, P. & Bernhardsson, S. (2019). Context matters in implementation science: a scoping review of determinant frameworks that describe contextual determinants for implementation outcomes. BMC Health Services Research 19(1): 189. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4015-3.
Orlikowski, W.J. & Scott, S.V. (2008). 10 Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals 2(1): 433–474. doi:10.5465/19416520802211644.
Orlikowski, W.J. & Scott, S.V. (2016). Digital work: a research agenda. In: Czarniawska, B. (Ed.). A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies (88–96). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781784717025.00014.
Osmundsen, K.S. (2024). Digital transformation from an employee perspective: a literature review. Beta 38(1): 1–18. doi:10.18261/beta.38.1.1.
Parasuraman, R. & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 39(2): 230–253. doi:10.1518/001872097778543886.
Parker, S.K. & Grote, G. (2020). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology 71(4): 1171–1204. doi:10.1111/apps.12241.
Petersson, L., Larsson, I., Nygren, J.M., Nilsen, P., Neher, M., Reed, J.E., Tyskbo, D. & Svedberg, P. (2022). Challenges to implementing artificial intelligence in healthcare: a qualitative interview study with healthcare leaders in Sweden. BMC Health Services Research 22(1): 850. doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08215-8.
Philip, J. (2021). Viewing digital transformation through the lens of transformational leadership. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 31(2): 114–129. doi:10.1080/10919392.2021.1911573.
Pilgrim, D. (2019). The utility of critical realism. In: Critical Realism for Psychologists. 1st ed. London: Routledge. pp. 1–228. doi:10.4324/9780429274497.
Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N. & Matos, P. (2018). Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies 6: 411–421. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_41.
SALAR (2018). Automatisering av arbete. Möjligheter och utmaningar för kommuner, landsting och regioner (Automation of work. Opportunities and challenges for municipalities, county councils, and regions). https://skr.se/download/18.5627773817e39e979ef38d99/1642168328686/5408.pdf (Accessed 2022).
SALAR (2024a). Breddinförande av vissa välfärdstekniska lösningar (Broad implementation of certain welfare technology solutions) https://skr.se/skr/naringslivarbetedigitalisering/digitalisering/handslagfordigitalisering/initiativhandslagfordigitalisering/initiativ/breddinforandeavvissavalfardstekniskalosningar.82174.html (Accessed 3 October 2024).
SALAR (2024b). Fakta om kommuner och regioner (Facts about municipalities and regions). https://skr.se/skr/tjanster/kommunerochregioner/faktakommunerochregioner (Accessed 27 March 2025).
SALAR (2020). Meddelande från styrelsen Överenskommelse mellan staten och Sveriges Kommuner och Regioner om äldreomsorg (Agreement between the State and the Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions on Elder Care) Message from the board of SALAR.
Saksvik, P.Ø., Christensen, M., Fossum, S., Lysklett, K. & Karanika-Murray, M. (2020). Investigating managerial qualities to support sustainable intervention effects in the long term. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 10(2): 81–99. doi:10.18291/njwls.v10i2.120821.
Shaw, J., Rudzicz, F., Jamieson, T. & Goldfarb, A. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and the Implementation Challenge. Journal of Medical Internet Research 21(7): e13659. doi:10.2196/13659.
Siira, E., Tyskbo, D. & Nygren, J. (2024). Healthcare leaders’ experiences of implementing artificial intelligence for medical history-taking and triage in Swedish primary care: an interview study. BMC Primary Care 25(1): 268. doi:10.1186/s12875-024-02516-z.
Sriharan, A., Sekercioglu, N., Mitchell, C., Senkaiahliyan, S., Hertelendy, A., Porter, T. & Banaszak-Holl, J. (2024). Leadership for AI transformation in health care organization: scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 26: e54556. doi:10.2196/54556.
Swedish Agency for Work Environment Expertise (MYNAK). (2022). Artificial Intelligence, Robotisation and the Work Environment https://sawee.se/publications/artificial-intelligence-robotisation-and-the-work-environment/ (Accessed 26 March 2025).
Tate, D., Lofgren, K. & Jesse, P. (2023). Towards a multi-stakeholder framework for evaluating digital government success. https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/articles/conference_contribution/Towards_a_multi-stakeholder_framework_for_evaluating_digital_government_success/24540100 (Accessed 10 March 2025).
The Government of Sweden (2021). Uppdrag att främja offentlig förvaltnings förmåga att använda artificiell intelligens (Mission to Promote Public Administration's Ability to Use Artificial Intelligence). I2021/01825. In: The Department of Infrastructure.
The National Board of Health and Welfare (2024a). E-hälsa och välfärdsteknik i kommunerna (E-health and welfare technology in municipalities). https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/ovrigt/2024-5-9099.pdf (Accessed 26 March 2025).
The National Board of Health and Welfare (2024b). Statistik om läkemedel 2023 (Statistics on Medicines 2023). https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik-och-data/statistik/alla-statistikamnen/lakemedel/ (Accessed 3 October 2024).
Toll, D. (2024). Process Automation in Swedish Municipalities: Stakeholders, Challenges, and Public Values. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press. doi:10.3384/9789180757140.
Tsai, C.-Y., Marshall, J.D., Choudhury, A., Serban, A., Tsung-Yu Hou, Y., Jung, M.F., Dionne, S.D. & Yammarino, F.J. (2022). Human-robot collaboration: a multilevel and integrated leadership framework. The Leadership Quarterly 33(1): 101594. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101594.
Xu, S., Stienmetz, J. & Ashton, M. (2020). How will service robots redefine leadership in hotel management? A Delphi approach. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 32(6): 2217–2237. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-05-2019-0505.
Zander, V., Gustafsson, C., Landerdahl Stridsberg, S. & Borg, J. (2021). Implementation of welfare technology: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 18(6): 913–928. doi:10.1080/17483107.2021.1938707.
Vision (2025). AI – kollega eller konkurrent? Administratörers utveckling och trygghet på en arbetsmarknad i förändring. (Development and Security of Administrators in a Changing Job Market). https://vision.se/opinion/rapporter/2025/ai-kollega-eller-konkurrent/ (Accessed 29 March 2025).
WHO (2024). Ageing and health. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (Accessed 16 March 2025).
Åkesson, M., Thomsen, M. and Johansson, J., 2025. Slutrapport: AI i byråkratins tjänst – förändrad digital arbetsmiljö när robotkollegor blir en del av vardagen (AI in the Service of Bureaucracy – A Changed Digital Work Environment When Robot Colleagues Become Part of Everyday Life). https://www.afaforsakring.se/dokument/esx42ffx59qakvll4tlv/AI_i_byr-kratins_tj-nst_M_-kesson.pdf (Accessed 29 March 2025).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Annica Asp at annica.asp@kau.se. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
