Gendered Labor Markets and Occupational Change in the Nordics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.160118Nøgleord:
Employment, Wages, Unemployment & Rehabilitation, Gender, Ethnicity, Age and Diversity, Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners, Innovation & ProductivityResumé
Recent research on changes in the occupational structure in the Nordic region points in different directions. Some studies indicate upgrading of jobs with better quality, advanced skill requirements, and higher wages, while others show tendencies toward polarization in the skill distribution of jobs. The present article finds gendered patterns of upgrading or polarization in the occupational structure in the Nordic countries in the years 2012–2019. The changes in the occupational structure have been more beneficial for women, who increasingly occupy higher-level positions. Especially, the public sector has served as a vehicle for high-level female positions. While previous research has stressed technological change, especially digitalization as the primary driver of change, this article argues that developments in the public sector also need to be considered to fully understand occupational change in the Nordic region.
Referencer
Acemoglu, D. & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In: Card, D. & Ashenfelter, O. (eds.) Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. 4B, 1043–1171. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(11)02410-5
Adermon, A. & Gustavsson, M. (2015). Job polarization and task-biased technological change: Evidence from Sweden, 1975–2005. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117, 878–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12109
Alonso, J. M., Clifton, J. & Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2015). Did new public management matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17, 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.822532
Anker, R. (1998). Gender and Jobs: Sex Segregation of Occupations in the World. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Asplund, R., Barth, E., Lundborg, P. & Nilsen, K. M. (2011). Polarization of the Nordic Labour markets. Finnish Economic Papers, 24, 87–110.
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 3–30.
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F. & Kearney, M. S. (2006). The polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 96, 189–194.
Autor, D. H., Levy, F. & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1279–1333. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355303322552801
Barth, E. & Østbakken, K. M. (2021). Fortsatt polarisering i det norske arbeidsmarkedet? Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 38, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-7989-2021-01-02
Baumol, W. J. (1967). Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis. The American Economic Review, 57, 415–426. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1812111
Berglund, T., Alasoini, T., Dølvik, J. E., Rasmussen, S., Steen, J. R. & Varje, P. (2020). Changes in the occupational structure of Nordic employment: Upgrading or polarization? Oslo: Fafo, Nordic future of work project 2017–2020: Working paper 2.
Berglund, T., Elgenius, G., Frank, D. & Omanović, V. (2025). Immigrants’ prospects on the labor market, occupational change, and unequal opportunities in Sweden. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.157307
Berglund, T. & Eriksson, Y. U. (2024). Scrutinizing Polarisation. Patterns and Consequences of Occupational Transformation in the Swedish Labour Market, London and New York, Routledge.
Berman, E., Bound, J. & Machin, S. 1998. Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1245–1279. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2586980
Black, S. E. & Spitz-Oener, A. (2010). Explaining women's success: technological change and the skill content of women's work. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 187–194.
Brynjolfsson, E. & Mcafee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age. New York: WW Norton Co.
Carneiro, A., Guimarães, P. & Portugal, P. (2012). Real wages and the business cycle: Accounting for worker, firm, and job title heterogeneity. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4, 133–152.
Cerina, F., Moro, A. & Rendall, M. (2021). The role of gender in employment polarization. International Economic Review, 62, 1655–1691.
Cohen, P. (2016). The persistence of gender segregation at work. Sociological Compass, 7, 889–899.
Drydakis, N. (2025). Artificial intelligence and labor market outcomes. IZA World of Labor 2025: 514.
Dustmann, C., Ludsteck, J. & Schönberg, U. (2007). Revisiting the German Wage Structure. Bonn: IZA Discussion Paper No. 2685.
Elias, P. (1997). Occupational Classification (ISCO-88): Concepts, Methods, Reliability, Validity and Cross-National Comparability. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/paper/304441717388
Eloundou, T., Manning, S., Mishkin, P. & Rock, D. (2023). GPTs are GPTs: an early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models (Version 5). arXiv.org. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2303.10130
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eurofound. (2017). Occupational change and wage inequality: European Jobs Monitor 2017 [Online]. https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/news/news-articles/employment-shifts-in-europe-during-the-recovery-three-little-noticed-trends: Eurofound. [Accessed 14.05 2019].
Eurofound & European Commission Joint Research Centre (2021). European Jobs Monitor 2021: Gender gaps and the employment structure. European Jobs Monitor series. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Felten, E., Raj, M. & Seamans, R. (2021). Occupational, industry, and geographic exposure to artificial intelligence: A novel dataset and its potential uses. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 2195–2217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3286
Fernández-Macías, E. (2012). Job polarization in Europe? Changes in the employment structure and job quality, 1995–2007. Work and Occupations, 39, 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888411427078
Fernández-Macías, E. & Hurley, J. (2017). Routine-biased technical change and job polarization in Europe. Socio-Economic Review, 15, 563–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mww016
Fernández-Macías, E., Hurley, J. & Bisello, M. (2016). What do Europeans do at work? A task-based analysis: European Jobs Monitor 2016.
Goos, M. & Manning, A. (2007). Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.1.118
Goos, M., Manning, A. & Salomons, A. (2009). Job Polarization in Europe. The American Economic Review, 99, 58–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25592375
Goos, M., Manning, A. & Salomons, A. (2014). Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review, 104, 2509–2526.
Green, A. (2019). What is happening to middle skill workers? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 230. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a934f8fa-en.
Hartman, L. (2011). Konkurrensens konsekvenser. Vad händer med svensk välfärd, 2.
Hermansen, A. S., Friberg, J. H. & Midtbøen, A. H. (2023). Occupational skills, ethnic stratification, and labor market assimilation across immigrant generations. In: Thålin, M. (ed.) A Research Agenda for Skills and Inequality. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Heyman, F. (2016). Job polarization, job tasks and the role of firms. Economics Letters, 145, 246–251. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.06.032
Katz, L. F. & Murphy, K. M. (1992). Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 35–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118323
Korpi, W. & Palme, J. (1998). The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review, 63, 661–687. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657333
Lehmer, F. & Matthes, B. K. (2015). Gender-specific employment polarization – the role of tasks from 1980 to 2010. [Online] Institute for Employment Research (IAB) Nuremberg. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4c81/dab16aedcb9d996cd44067b4683c6c4f44b8.pdf
Mandel, H. & Semyonov, M. (2006). A welfare state paradox: State interventions and womens employment opportunities in 22 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1910–1949. https://doi.org/10.1086/499912
Mazzolari, F. & Ragusa, G. (2013). Spillovers from high-skill consumption to low-skill labor markets. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 74–86. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:tpr:restat:v:95:y:2013:i:1:p:74-86
OECD (2017). How technology and globalization are transforming the labour market. In: OECD (ed.) OECD Employment Outlook 2017. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2017-en.
OECD (2021). Population with tertiary education (indicator). https://data-explorer.oecd.org/
OECD (2022). Government at Glance Database. https://www.oecd.org/en/data/datasets/oecd-government-at-a-glance-database.html
OESCH, D. (2015). Welfare regimes and change in the employment structure: Britain, Denmark and Germany since 1990. Journal of European Social Policy, 25, 94–110.
Oesch, D. & Piccitto, G. (2019). The polarization myth: Occupational upgrading in Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the UK, 1992–2015. Work and Occupations, 46, 441–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888419860880
Seeleib-Kaiser, M. (2016). The end of the conservative German Welfare State Model. Social Policy & Administration, 50, 219–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12212
Sivesind, K. H. (2017). The changing roles of for-profit and nonprofit welfare provision in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark. In: Sivesind, K. H. & Saglie, J. (eds.) Promoting Active Citizenship. Markets and Choice in Scandinavian Welfare. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
SKR (2019). Köp av verksamhet 2019. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och regioner.
Steen, J. R. & Svalund, J. (2024). En yrkessstruktur i endring: Hvordan har ny teknologi påvirket hvor kvinner og menn jobber? In: Alsos, K., Oppegaard, S. & Trygstad, S. C. (eds.) Den norske arbeidslivsmodellen: status og utfordringer i en brytningstid. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Tåhlin, M. (2023). Skills and Inequality – Introduction and overview. In: Tåhlin, M. (ed.) A Research Agenda for Skills and Inequality. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Webb, J. (2009). Gender and occupation in market economies: Change and restructuring since the 1980s. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16, 82–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxp003
Østbakken, K. M., Orupabo, J. & Nadim, M. (2023). The hierarchy of care work: How immigrants influence the gender-segregated labor market. Social Politics: International Studies In Gender, State & Society, 30, 818–843. https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxac039
Åberg, R. (2015). Svensk arbetsmarknad mot polarisering efter millennieskiftet. Arbetsmarknad & arbeitsliv, 21, 8–25.
Åslund, O., Bratu, C., Lombardi, S. & Thoresson, A. (2021). Firm productivity and immigrant-native earnings disparity. Discussion Paper Series, CDP 37/21, Centre for Research and Analysis of Migration, UCL.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse – Ikke-kommerciel – Ingen Bearbejdede Værker (by-nc-nd).
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Annica Asp at annica.asp@kau.se. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
