Robot dilemmas: Deception and digital emotional labor in dementia care work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.159961Keywords:
Health, Working Environment & Wellbeing, Identity, Meaning & Culture, Organization & ManagementAbstract
Based on in-depth interviews with care workers and observational visits to nursing homes, this study investigates how care workers address residents’ frequent misperceptions of robot cats and dogs as real animals. The analysis focuses on two aspects: how care workers handle the fact that residents often mistake the robots for real animals, and how their approach to deceptive practices relation to the robots is related to emotional labor. Three main strategies are identified and explored: telling the truth, remaining vague, and lying. While the first strategy prioritizes ethical guidelines over residents’ wellbeing in the moment, the second two strategies are facilitated by physical and verbal cues, as well as storytelling in collaboration with colleagues and residents. Each strategy also entails a dilemma, as each carries its own ethical challenges.
Author Biographies
David Redmalm, Mälardalen University
Associate Professor, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Division of Sociology. E-mail: david.redmalm@mdu.se
Clara Iversen, Uppsala University
Associate Professor, Department of Social Work
Marcus Persson, Linköping University
Associate Professor, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning
Elin Thunman, Uppsala University
Associate Professor, Department of Sociology
References
Birks, M., Bodak, M., Barlas, J., Harwood, J. & Pether, M. (2016). Robotic seals as therapeutic tools in an aged care facility: a qualitative study. Journal of Aging Research: Article ID 8569602. doi: 10.1155/2016/8569602
Blum, N. S. (1994). Deceptive practices in managing a family member with Alzheimer's disease. Symbolic Interaction, 17(1): 21–36. doi: 10.1525/si.1994.17.1.21
Cantone, D., Attena, F., Cerrone, S., Fabozzi, A., Rossiello, R., Spagnoli, L. & Pelullo, C. P. (2019). Lying to patients with dementia: Attitudes versus behaviours in nurses. Nursing Ethics, 26(4): 984–992. doi: 10.1177/0969733017739782
Chevallier, M. (2023). Staging Paro: The care of making robot(s) care. Social Studies of Science, 53(5): 635–659. doi: 10.1177/03063127221126148
Cozza, M. (2021). Elderliness: The agential inseparability of ageing and assistive technologies. In Peine, A., Marshall, B. L., Martin, W. & Neven, L. (Eds.), Socio–gerontechnology: Interdisciplinary Critical Studies of Ageing and Technology, pp. 70–84. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780429278266-6
Culley, H., Barber, R., Hope, A. & James, I. (2013). Therapeutic lying in dementia care. Nursing Standard, 28(1): 35–39. doi: 10.7748/ns2013.09.28.1.35.e7749
DeFalco, A. (2020). Towards a theory of posthuman care: Real humans and caring robots. Body & Society, 26(3): 31–60. doi: 10.1177/1357034X20917450
Dyring, R. & Grøn, L. (2022). Ellen and the little one: A critical phenomenology of potentiality in life with dementia. Anthropological Theory, 22(1): 3–25.
Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I. & Shaw, L. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001
Frezza, G., Veldhuis, J. & Burgers, C. (2022). Expressing negative emotions as a key to living with and coping with dementia, SSM – Qualitative Research in Health, 2: 100129. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2022.100129
Gwernan‐Jones, R., Abbott, R., Lourida, I., Rogers, M., Green, C., Ball, S., Hemsley, A., Cheeseman, D., Clare, L., Moore, D. A., Hussey, C., Coxon, G., Llewellyn, D. J., Naldrett, T. & Thompson Coon, J. O. (2020). The experiences of hospital staff who provide care for people living with dementia: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies. International Journal of Older People Nursing, 15(4): Article ID e12325. doi: 10.1111/opn.12325
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice. Third edition. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315146027
Hasselkus, B. R. (1997). Everyday ethics in dementia day care: Narratives of crossing the line. The Gerontologist, 37(5): 640–649. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.5.640
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. California: University of California Press.
Hydén, L-C. & Örulv, L. (2006). Confabulation: Sense-making, self-making and world-making in dementia. Discourse Studies 8(5): 647–673. doi: 10.1177/1461445606067333
Höppner, G. (2023). Distributed age(ing): Features of a material gerontology. Journal of Aging Studies, 67: Article 101185. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101185
Iversen, C., Persson, M. & Redmalm, D. (2024). Playful framings of social robots in dementia care: reconsidering the principle of transparency in interactions with robot animals. Ageing & Society, 1–22. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X24000539
Jackman, L. (2020). Extending the Newcastle Model: How therapeutic communication can reduce distress in people with dementia. Nursing Older People, 32(2): 33–41. doi: 10.7748/nop.2020.e1206
James, I. A. & Caiazza, R. (2018). Therapeutic lies in dementia care: Should psychologists teach others to be person-centred liars? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 46(4): 454–462. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000152
James, I. A., Wood-Mitchell, A. J., Waterworth, A. M., Mackenzie, L. E. & Cunningham, J. (2006). Lying to people with dementia: Developing ethical guidelines for care settings. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21: 800–801. doi: 10.1002/gps.1551
Jenkins, N. (2017). No substitute for human touch? Towards a critically posthumanist approach to dementia care. Ageing & Society, 37(7): 1484–1498. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X16000453
Jongsma, K. & Schweda, M. (2018). Return to childhood? Against the infantilization of people with dementia. Bioethics, 32(7): 414–420. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12458
Kirtley, A. & Williamson, T. (2016). What is Truth?. An Inquiry about Truth and Lying in Dementia Care. London: Mental Health Foundation.
Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Law, J. (2004). After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203481141
Leeson, C. (2017). Anthropomorphic robots on the move: A transformative trajectory from Japan to Danish healthcare. PhD thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Lewis, P. (2005). Suppression or expression: An exploration of emotion management in a special care baby unit. Work, Employment and Society, 19(3): 565–581. doi: 10.1177/0950017005055673
Lukić, D. (2023). Dementia as a material for co-creative art making: Towards feminist posthumanist caring. Journal of Aging Studies, 67: Article 101169. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101169
Matthias, A (2015). Robot lies in health care: When is deception morally permissible? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 25(2): 162–169. doi: 10.1353/ken.2015.0007
Moyle, W., Bramble, M., Jones, C. & Murfield, J. (2016). Care staff perceptions of a social robot called Paro and a look-alike Plush Toy: A descriptive qualitative approach. Aging & Mental Health, 1–6. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1262820
Murphy, A. (2024). The spirited interworld: Caregiving and the liminal phenomenology of dementia. Puncta, 7(1): 57–68. doi: 10.61372/PJCP.v7i1.5
The Norwegian Department of Health (2015). Demensplan 2020. (Dementia Care Plan 2020). Policy document published by the Government of Norway, Ministry of Health.
Peine, A. & Neven, L. (2021). The co-constitution of ageing and technology—A model and agenda. Ageing & Society, 41(12): 2845–2866. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X20000641
Persson, M., Iversen, C. & Redmalm, D. (2025). Robot animals and the emotional labor of caregivers. In Johnson, E. (Ed.). How That Robot Made Me Feel. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 107–125. doi: 0.7551/mitpress/15314.003.0007
Persson, M., Redmalm, D. & Iversen, C. (2022). Caregivers’ use of robots and their effect on work environment: a scoping review. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 40(3): 251–277. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2021.2000554
Persson, M., Ferm, L., Redmalm, D. & Iversen, C. (2023). Working with robotic animals in dementia care: The significance of caregivers’ competences. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 13(3): 49–69. doi: 10.18291/njwls.136521
Persson, M., Iversen, C. & Redmalm, D. (2024a). Making robots matter in dementia care: Conceptualising the triadic interaction between caregiver, resident and robot animal. Sociology of Health & Illness, 46(6): 1192–1211. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13786
Persson, M., Thunman, E., Iversen, C. & Redmalm, D. (2024b). Robotic misinformation in dementia care: Emotions as sense-making resources in residents’ encounters with robot animals. Frontiers in Sociology, 9: 1354978. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1354978
Pilnick, A., O'Brien, R., Beeke, S., Windeatt-Harrison, I., Bridgstock, L. & Harwood, R. H. (2025). ‘I want to get out … I've got a child at home’: Intersubjectivity, reality disjunctures and distress in the care of people living with dementia in the acute hospital. Social Science & Medicine, 369: Article ID 117805. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117805
Preston, L., Marshall, A. & Bucks, R. S. (2007). Investigating the ways that older people cope with dementia: A qualitative study. Aging & Mental Health, 11:2: 131–143. doi: 10.1080/13607860600844572
Quinn, J. & Blandon, C. (2020). Lifelong Learning and Dementia: A Posthumanist Perspective. Springer Nature. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-42231-8
Redmalm, D., Iversen, C. & Persson, M. (2024). Can robots lie? A posthumanist approach to robotic animals and deceptive practices in dementia care. Journal of Aging Studies, 71: Article ID 101272. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101272
Redmalm, D., Persson, M. & Iversen, C. (2023) Robotic animals in dementia care: Conceptions of animality and humanity in care organizations. In Hamilton, L. & Tallberg, L. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Organization Studies: A Critical Reader in Ethics, Business and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 409–424. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192848185.013.27
Robinson, H., Broadbent, E. & MacDonald, B. (2016). Group sessions with Paro in a nursing home: Structure, observations, and interviews. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 35(2): 106–112. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12199
Schou-Juul, F., Nørgaard, S. & Lauridsen, S. M. R. (2023). Ethical issues in dementia guidelines for people with dementia and informal caregivers in Denmark: A qualitative thematic synthesis. Dementia, 22(1): 28–45. doi: 10.1177/14713012221131856
Schuster, E. (1996). Ethical considerations when conducting ethnographic research in a nursing home setting. Journal of Aging Studies, 10(1): 57–67. doi: 10.1016/S0890-4065(96)90017-1
Seaman, A. T. & Stone, A. M. (2017). Little white lies: Interrogating the (un)acceptability of deception in the context of dementia. Qualitative Health Research, 27(1): 60–73. doi: 10.1177/1049732315618370
Sharkey, A. & Sharkey, N. (2021). We need to talk about deception in social robotics!. Ethics and Information Technology, 23: 309–316. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09573-9
Shibata, T., Inoue, K. & Irie, R. (1996). Emotional robot for intelligent system-artificial emotional creature project. In Proceedings 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, RO-MAN’96 TSUKUBA, Tsukuba, Japan (pp. 466–471). doi: 10.1109/roman.1996.568881
Skov, S. S., Jensen, A. M., Rasmussen, G., Folker, A. P. & Lauridsen, S. (2024). Compassionate deception: An ethnographic study of how and why health professionals and family members lie when caring for people with dementia in Danish nursing homes. SSM – Qualitative Research in Health, 6: 100457. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmqr.2024.100457
Stacey, J. & Suchman, L. (2012). Animation and automation—The liveliness and labours of bodies and machines. Body & Society, 18(1): 1–46. doi: 10.1177/1357034X11431845
Statens Medicinsk-Etiska Råd (SMER) (2014). Robotar och övervakning i vården av äldre – etiska aspekter. (Robots and surveillance in the care of elderly—Ethical aspects). Report no. 2014:2. Stockholm: SMER.
Tuckett, A. G. (2004). Truth-telling in clinical practice and the arguments for and against: A review of the literature. Nursing Ethics, 11(5): 500–513. doi: 10.1191/0969733004ne728oa
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H. & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3): 398–405. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12048
Vandemuelebroucke, T., Dierckx de Casterlé, B. & Gastmans, C. (2018). The use of care robots in aged care: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature, Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 74: 15–25. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.08.014
Verdelho, A. & Gonçalves-Pereira, M. (Eds.). (2017). Neuropsychiatric Symptoms of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. Springer International Publishing AG. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-39138-0.
Wardle, C. & Derakhshan, H. (2018). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Strasbourg Cedex: Council of Europe.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Annica Asp at annica.asp@kau.se. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
