Workers and New Technology? Analyzing the Complex and Multidimensional Relation through Job Quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.158618Keywords:
Health, Working Environment & Wellbeing, Labor Market Institutions & Social PartnersAbstract
While the impact of new technology on work is vast, our knowledge remains somewhat fragmented, particularly from a workers’ perspective. This article applies job quality as a multi-dimensional approach to contribute to deepening our understanding of the effect new technology has for public sector workers in Denmark. Job quality is a multi-dimensional concept, and the technological development has a different impact on the various dimensions leading to somewhat mixed results. Despite studying different occupations, the impact on some dimensions was clearer: the results show how worker autonomy is challenged by new technology, the physical work environment is improved, and levels of workload, stress, and job intensity are being more negatively affected. Overall, new technology is improving some dimensions of job quality, worsening others, and yet other dimensions remain less affected, contributing to the overall complexity. However, there is a subjective dimension, with the same technology having varying impact on workers.
Author Biography
Bjarke Refslund, Aalborg University
Department of Sociology and Social Work. E-mail: bref@socsci.aau.dk
References
Andersen, S.K. (2024). Multi-employer bargaining in Denmark: Interwoven processes of coordination, International Labour Review 163(4): 693–710. https://doi:/10.1111/ilr.12446
Antón, J., Fernández-Macías, E., and Winter-Ebmer, R. (2023). Does robotization affect job quality? Evidence from European regional labor markets, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 62(3): 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12324
Berg, J., Green, F., Nurski, L., and Spencer, D. (2022). Risks to job quality from digital technologies: are industrial relations in Europe ready for the challenge? Working Paper 16/2022. Bruegel.
Bergquist, M., and Rolandsson, B. (2022). Exploring ADM in clinical decision-making: Healthcare experts encountering digital automation. In S. Pink, M. Berg, D. Lupton & M. Ruckenstein (Eds.), Everyday Automation (pp. 140–153). Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003170884
Bergschöld, J.M. (2018). When saving time becomes labor: time, work, and technology in homecare, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 8(1): 3–21. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v8i1.104850
Bisht, N., Trusson, C., Siwale, J., and Ravishankar, M. (2023). Enhanced job satisfaction under tighter technological control: The paradoxical outcomes of digitalization, New Technology, Work and Employment 38(2): 162–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12222
Dupret, K. (2017). Working around technologies—invisible professionalism? New Technology, Work and Employment 32(2): 174–187. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12093
Ertner, M. (2019). Enchanting, evoking, and affecting: The invisible work of technology implementation in homecare, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(S5): 33–47. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v9iS5.112690
Findlay, P., Kalleberg, A., and Warhurst, C. (2013). The challenge of job quality, Human Relations 66(4): 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713481070
Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future, New York: Basic Books.
Frennert, S. (2019). Lost in digitalization? Municipality employment of welfare technologies, Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 14(6): 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1496362
Gallie, D. (2007). Employment Regimes and the Quality of Work, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gallie, D. (2013). Direct participation and the quality of work, Human Relations 66(4): 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712473035
Gihleb, R., Giuntella, O., Stella, L., and Wang, T. (2022). Industrial robots, Workers’ safety, and health, Labour Economics 78: 102205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102205
Green, F. (2001). It’s been a hard day’s night: the concentration and intensification of work in late twentieth‐century Britain, British Journal of Industrial Relations 39(1): 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00189
Green, F. (2013). Demanding Work, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Green, F., Felstead, A., Gallie, D., and Henseke, G. (2018). Work intensity in Britain: First findings from the Skills and Employment Survey 2017, UCL Institute of Education.
Gundhus, H., Talberg, N., and Wathne, C. (2022). From discretion to standardization: Digitalization of the police organization, International Journal of Police Science & Management 24(1): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557211036554
Hamblin, K. (2022). Technology in care systems: Displacing, reshaping, reinstating or degrading roles?, New Technology, Work and Employment 37(1): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12229
Holm, J., and Lorenz, E. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence on skills at work in Denmark, New Technology, Work and Employment 37(1): 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12215
Holman, D. (2013). Job types and job quality in Europe, Human relations 66(4): 475–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712456407
Howcroft, D., and Taylor, P. (2023). Automation and the future of work: A social shaping of technology approach, New Technology, Work and Employment 38(2): 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12240
Karasek, R. (1979). Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign, Administrative Science Quarterly 24(2): 285–308. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392498
Lloyd, C., and Payne, J. (2019). Rethinking country effects: Robotics, AI and work futures in Norway and the UK, New Technology, Work and Employment 34(3): 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12149
Lloyd, C., and Payne, J. (2021). Fewer jobs, better jobs? An international comparative study of robots and “routine” work in the public sector, Industrial Relations Journal 52(2): 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12323
Lloyd, C., and Payne, J. (2025) Digitalisation, unions and ‘country-effect’: Does union strength at the workplace matter?, Journal of Industrial Relations. Epub ahead of print. 10.1177/00221856251326682
MacKenzie, D., and Wajcman, J. (1999). The Social Shaping of Technology, Buckingham: Open University Press.
MacKenzie, R., Marks, A., and Morgan, K. (2017). Technology, Affordances and Occupational Identity amongst Older Telecommunications Engineers: From Living Machines to Black-Boxes, Sociology 51(4): 732–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038515616352
Marenco, M., and Seidl, T. (2021). The discursive construction of digitalization: A comparative analysis of national discourses on the digital future of work, European Political Science Review 13(3): 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577392100014X
Martin, L., and Hauret, L. (2022). Digitalization, job quality, and subjective well-being, In: Zimmermann, K. (ed), Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_388-1
Menon, S., Salvatori, A., and Zwysen, W. (2020). The effect of computer use on work discretion and work intensity: Evidence from Europe, British Journal of Industrial Relations 58(4): 1004–1038. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12504
Moore, PV., Upchurch, M., and Whittaker, X., (2018). Humans and Machines at Work, Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58232-0
Morgan, D.L., and Nica, A. (2020). Iterative thematic inquiry: A new method for analyzing qualitative data, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 14(4): 532–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920955118
Muñoz de Bustillo, R., Fernández-Macías, E., Esteve, F., and Antón, J.-A. (2011). E Pluribus Unum? A critical survey of job quality indicators, Socio-Economic Review 9(3): 447–475. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr005
Oinas, T., Anttila, T., Mustosmäki, A., and Nätti, J. (2012). The Nordic difference: Job quality in Europe 1995–2010, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 2(4):135–152. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v2i4.2308
Onwuegbuzie, A., Dickinson, W., Leech, N., and Zoran, A. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8(3): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
Peña-Casas, R., and Ghailani, D. (2023). The Impact of Digitalisation on Job Quality in the Electricity, Hospital and Public Administrations Sectors in Eight EU Countries, Brussels: OSE-report.
Petersen, K., and Schou, J. (2020). Digitalization and the Danish welfare state: Policies, institutional changes and strategic dilemmas, Journal of Policy Science 27(3): 97–113.
Refslund, B., and Borello, A. (2023) The impact of digitalisation on job quality and social dialogue in the public services – The case of Denmark DIGIQU@LPUB. Report, Aalborg University.
Rosa, H., (2014). From work-life to work-age balance? Acceleration, alienation, and appropriation at the workplace, In: Korunka, C., and Hoonakker, P. (eds.), The impact of ICT on Quality of Working Life. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8854-0_4
Scheibelhofer, E. (2023). The interpretive interview. An interview form centring on research participants’ constructions, International Journal of Qualitative Methods 22: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231168748
Shevchuk, A., Strebkov, D., and Davis, S. (2019). The autonomy paradox: How night work undermines subjective well-being of internet-based freelancers, ILR Review 72(1): 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0019793918767114
Srivastava, S., Chandra, S., and Shirish, A. (2015). Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits, Information Systems Journal 25(4): 355–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12067
Trusson, C., Hislop, D., and Doherty, N. (2018). The role of ICTs in the servitisation and degradation of IT professional work, New Technology, Work and Employment 33(2): 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12109
Wajcman, J. (2017). Automation: is it really different this time?, The British Journal of Sociology 68(1): 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.12239
Warhurst, C., Mathieu, C., and Dwyer, R. (2022). The Oxford Handbook of Job Quality, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198749790.001.0001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Annica Asp at annica.asp@kau.se. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
