Remote Work and the Psychosocial Work Environment: The Role of Contact
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.157873Keywords:
Health, Working Environment & Wellbeing, Organization & ManagementAbstract
Remote work is fundamentally changing the organization of work, replacing the physical work environment of the office and creating a spatial distance between colleagues. This article investigates the relationship between remote work frequency and three aspects of the psychosocial work environment (quantitative job demands, control, and social support) and to which extent the relationship is mediated by the frequency of contact with supervisors and co-workers. The Norlife Remote Work - Longitudinal Study (NorRemo-LS) of Norwegian employees (n = 2553) across four waves between February 2021 and September 2022 is analyzed using general structural equation modeling (GSEM). The results show that the extent of remote work is associated with increased schedule control. Remote work may diminish employee control and increase quantitative job demands if employees have less frequent contact with their supervisor. Less frequent contact with co-workers not only entails lower job control and less social support but also lower quantitative demands.
Author Biographies
Mari Holm Ingelsrud, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
PhD, Senior Researcher, The Work Research Institute. E-mail: mari-holm.ingelsrud@oslomet.no
Vilde Hoff Bernstrøm, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
PhD, Senior Researcher, The Work Research Institute
Wendy Nilsen, OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
PhD, Senior Researcher, The Work Research Institute
References
Aagestad C, Bjerkan AM and Gravseth HMU (2017) Arbeidsmiljøet i Norge og EU-en sammenligning. STAMI-rapport.
Allen DG, Renn RW and Griffeth RW (2003) The impact of telecommuting design on social systems, self-regulation, and role boundaries. Research in personnel and human resources management. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Arbeidsmiljøloven Lov 17. juni 2005 om arbeidsmiljø, arbeidstid og stillingsvern mv.
Bélanger F, Watson-Manheim MB and Swan BR (2013) A multi-level socio-technical systems telecommuting framework. Behaviour & Information Technology 32(12): 1257-1279. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2012.705894
Bentley TA, Teo ST, McLeod L, et al. (2016) The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied Ergonomics 52: 207-215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.019
Bloom N, Han R and Liang J (2024) Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature 630(8018): 920-925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2
Bloom N, Liang J, Roberts J and Ying ZJ (2014) Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 130(1): 165-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju032
Burr H, Berthelsen H, Moncada S, et al. (2019) The Third Version of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire. Safety and Health at Work 10(4): 482-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002
Cameron AC and Trivedi PK (2005) Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cañibano A (2019) Workplace flexibility as a paradoxical phenomenon: Exploring employee experiences. Human Relations 72(2): 444-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718769716
Charalampous M, Grant CA, Tramontano C and Michailidis E (2019) Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: a multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 28(1): 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
Choi S, Leiter J and Tomaskovic-Devey D (2008) Contingent Autonomy:Technology, Bureaucracy, and Relative Power in the Labor Process. Work and Occupations 35(4): 422-455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888408326766
Collins AM, Hislop D and Cartwright S (2016) Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office‐based colleagues and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment 31(2): 161-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12065
Dølvik JE (2013) Grunnpilarene i de nordiske modellene. Et tilbakeblikk på arbeidslivs-og velferdsregimenes utvikling NordMod2030. Oslo: Fafo, rapport 13.
Dubrin AJ (1991) Comparison of the Job Satisfaction and Productivity of Telecommuters versus in-House Employees: A Research Note on Work in Progress. Psychological Reports 68(3_suppl): 1223-1234. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1223
Eguchi H, Inoue A, Hino A, et al. (2022) Effect of working from home on the association between job demands and psychological distress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(10): 6287. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106287
Eng W, Moore S, Grunberg L, et al. (2010) What influences work-family conflict? The function of work support and working from home. Current Psychology 29(2): 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9075-9
Finne LB, Christensen JO and Knardahl S (2014) Psychological and Social Work Factors as Predictors of Mental Distress: A Prospective Study. PLOS ONE 9(7): e102514. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102514
Fleming P (2022) How biopower puts freedom to work: Conceptualizing ‘pivoting mechanisms’ in the neoliberal university. Human Relations 75(10): 1986-2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221079578
Fonner KL and Roloff ME (2010) Why Teleworkers are More Satisfied with Their Jobs than are Office-Based Workers: When Less Contact is Beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research 38(4): 336-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
Gajendran RS and Harrison DA (2007) The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(6): 1524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Gajendran RS, Ponnapalli AR, Wang C and Javalagi AA (2024) A dual pathway model of remote work intensity: A meta-analysis of its simultaneous positive and negative effects. Personnel Psychology 77(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12641
Gallie D (2013) Direct participation and the quality of work. Human Relations 66(4): 453-473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712473035
Giménez-Nadal JI, Molina JA and Velilla J (2020) Work time and well-being for workers at home: evidence from the American Time Use Survey. International Journal of Manpower 41(2): 184-206. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2018-0134
Guest D, Knox A and Warhurst C (2022) Humanizing work in the digital age: Lessons from socio-technical systems and quality of working life initiatives. Human Relations 75(8): 1461-1482. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221092674
Guidetti G, Converso D, Sanseverino D and Ghislieri C (2022) Return to Work during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Study on the Role of Job Demands, Job Resources, and Personal Resources upon the Administrative Staff of Italian Public Universities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(4): 1995. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19041995
Hall L and Atkinson C (2006) Improving working lives: flexible working and the role of employee control. Employee Relations 28(4): 374-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/01425450610673420
Håpnes T and Rasmussen B (2011) Policies and practices of family friendliness. Time and employment relations in knowledge work. Old site of Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 1(2): 39-57.
Heiret J (2012) Three Norwegian Varieties of a Nordic Model — A Historical Perspective on Working Life Relations. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 2(4): pp. 45-66. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v2i4.2304
Hill EJ, Erickson JJ, Holmes EK and Ferris M (2010) Workplace flexibility, work hours, and work-life conflict: Finding an extra day or two. Journal of Family Psychology 24: 349-358. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019282
ILO (2020) Teleworking during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. A practical guide. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Ingelsrud MH, Aksnes SY, Bernstrøm VH, et al. (2022) Hjemme–Borte–Uavgjort. Hjemmekontor og annet fjernarbeid: Kartlegging av omfang, utviklingstrekk og konsekvenser. [Translated title: Working from home and other forms of remote work: Scope, trends and consequences.]. AFI-rapport 2022:04, Oslo: Work Research Institute.
Karasek R and Theorell T (1990) Healthy Work. Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.
Kelliher C and Anderson D (2008) For better or for worse? An analysis of how flexible working practices influence employees' perceptions of job quality. International Journal of Human Resource Management 19(3): 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801895502
Kelliher C and Anderson D (2010) Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations 63(1): 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709349199
Kline RB (2016) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
Knardahl S and Christensen JO (2022) Working at home and expectations of being available: effects on perceived work environment, turnover intentions, and health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 48(2): 99-108. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3996
Laß I and Wooden M (2023) Working from Home and Work–Family Conflict. Work, Employment and Society 37(1): 176-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170221082474
Leka S and Jain A (2016) Mental health in the workplace in europe. Eu compass for action on mental health and well-being.
Lindebaum D, den Hond F, Greenwood M, et al. (2022) Freedom, work and organizations in the 21st century: Freedom for whom and for whose purpose? Human Relations 75(10): 1853-1874. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267221093516
Llorens CJ, Pérez-Franco J, Oudyk J, et al. (2019) COPSOQ III. Guidelines and questionnaire. https://www.copsoq-network.org/licence-guidelines-and-questionnaire.
Metselaar SA, den Dulk L and Vermeeren B (2023) Teleworking at Different Locations Outside the Office: Consequences for Perceived Performance and the Mediating Role of Autonomy and Work-Life Balance Satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration 43(3): 456-478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371x221087421
Nätti J, Tammelin M, Anttila T and Ojala S (2011) Work at home and time use in Finland. New Technology, Work and Employment 26(1): 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2010.00258.x
Nergaard K, Andersen RK, Alsos K and Oldervoll J (2018) Fleksibel arbeidstid. En analyse av ordninger i norsk arbeidsliv. Oslo: Fafo.
Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bruinvels D and Frings-Dresen M (2010) Psychosocial work environment and stress-related disorders, a systematic review. Occupational Medicine 60(4): 277-286. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqq081
Peters P and van der Lippe T (2007) The time-pressure reducing potential of telehomeworking: the Dutch case. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 18(3): 430-447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190601167730
Peters SE, Dennerlein JT, Wagner GR and Sorensen G (2022) Work and worker health in the post-pandemic world: a public health perspective. The Lancet Public Health 7(2): e188-e194. 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00259-0
Pulido-Martos M, Cortés-Denia D and Lopez-Zafra E (2021) Teleworking in times of COVID-19: Effects on the acquisition of personal resources. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 685275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685275
Restrepo BJ and Zeballos E (2020) The effect of working from home on major time allocations with a focus on food-related activities. Review of Economics of the Household 18(4): 1165-1187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09497-9
Rhoades L and Eisenberger R (2002) Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4): 698-714. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.698
Rodríguez-Modroño P (2022) Working Conditions and Work Engagement by Gender and Digital Work Intensity. Information 13(6): 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13060277
Sardeshmukh SR, Sharma D and Golden TD (2012) Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: a job demands and job resources model. New Technology, Work and Employment 27(3): 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2012.00284.x
Sewell G and Taskin L (2015) Out of Sight, Out of Mind in a New World of Work? Autonomy, Control, and Spatiotemporal Scaling in Telework. Organization Studies 36(11): 1507-1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593587
Shimura A, Yokoi K, Ishibashi Y, et al. (2021) Remote work decreases psychological and physical stress responses, but full-remote work increases presenteeism. Frontiers in Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730969. 4190. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.730969
Šmite D, Moe NB, Klotins E and Gonzalez-Huerta J (2023) From forced Working-From-Home to voluntary working-from-anywhere: Two revolutions in telework. Journal of Systems and Software 195: 111509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2022.111509
Stansfeld S and Candy B (2006) Psychosocial work environment and mental health-a meta-analytic review. Scand J Work Environ Health 32(6): 443-462. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1050
Taskin L, Klinksiek I and Ajzen M (2024) Re-humanising management through co-presence: Lessons from enforced telework during the second wave of Covid-19. New Technology, Work and Employment 39(1): 143-167. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12271
Taylor SE, Dickerson S and Klein LC (2002) Toward a biology of social support. Handbook of positive psychology. 556-569.
Tejero LMS, Seva RR and Fadrilan-Camacho VFF (2021) Factors Associated With Work-Life Balance and Productivity Before and During Work From Home. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 63(12): 1065-1072. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000002377
Thomas LT and Ganster DC (1995) Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 80(1): 6. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.80.1.6
Thulin E and Vilhelmson B (2022) Pacesetters in contemporary telework: How smartphones and mediated presence reshape the time–space rhythms of daily work. New Technology, Work and Employment 37(2): 250-269. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12224
Valcour M (2007) Work-based resources as moderators of the relationship between work hours and satisfaction with work-family balance. Journal of Applied Psychology 92(6): 1512-1523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1512
Vander Elst T, Verhoogen R, Sercu M, et al. (2017) Not Extent of Telecommuting, But Job Characteristics as Proximal Predictors of Work-Related Well-Being. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 59(10): e180-e186. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001132
Vleeshouwers J, Fløvik L, Christensen JO, et al. (2022) The relationship between telework from home and the psychosocial work environment: a systematic review. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-022-01901-4
Wöhrmann AM and Ebner C (2021) Understanding the bright side and the dark side of telework: An empirical analysis of working conditions and psychosomatic health complaints. New Technology, Work and Employment 36(3): 348-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12208
Yeves J, Bargsted M and Torres-Ochoa C (2022) Work schedule flexibility and teleworking were not good together during COVID-19 when testing their effects on work overload and mental health. Frontiers in Psychology 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998977
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Annica Asp at annica.asp@kau.se. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
