The Makerspace as a collegial and technologically mediated learning environment: A practice-oriented analysis of workplace-based learning at a vocational school 

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v10i17.151691

Keywords:

Erhvervsskole, Makerspace, Læringsrum, Teknologi

Abstract

New teaching materials and learning environments provide new learning opportunities, not only for students but also for teachers. This article focuses on makerspaces and associated digital technologies as collegial, workplace‑based learning environments in vocational schools. Through an action research project, teachers engaged in experimental forms of practice where technology and craftsmanship were brought into play in relation to their own teaching practice. Based on eight interviews conducted in the ’LabSTEM’ project, challenges in vocational teachers’ work in the makerspace were identified. The analysis is grounded in an integrated practice‑theoretical framework, using three complementary theoretical traditions: communities of practice theory (Wenger), cultural‑historical activity theory (Engeström), and actor‑network theory (Latour), which conceptualize learning as situated, mediated, and collective practice. The article is anchored in a pragmatic epistemological position, where theory is understood as situated conceptual resources used generatively in analysis. These practice‑theoretical traditions serve as analytical resources that collectively demonstrate how makerspaces create spaces for the renegotiation of professional communities and the development of teaching practice. Through interaction in the makerspace, collegial dialogue and development processes emerge, where vocational domains and professional practice are disrupted and transformed.

Author Biographies

Morten Christensen, UCL Erhvervsakademi og Professionshøjskole

Dorte Moeskær Larsen, Syddansk Universitet

Claus Auning, UC SYD

Connie Svabo, Syddansk Universitet

References

Christensen, M., Svabo, C. Larsen, D. (2023). STEM i erhvervsskolen: aktiviteter og ideer. Odense: Syddansk universitet. Laboratorium for STEM Uddannelse og læring. Forskningscenter for Naturvidenskabelig Uddannelse og Formidling.

Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., & Tishman, S. (2016). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. CA: Jossey-Bass

Crichton, S. (2014). Leapfrogging pedagogy: A design approach to making change in challenging contexts. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 12(1), 3–13.

Engeström, Y. (2001) Expansive Learning at Work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization, Journal of Education and Work, 14:1, 133-156, https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747

Engeström, Y. (2014). Activity Theory and Learning at Work. In: Deinet, U., Reutlinger, C. (eds) Tätigkeit - Aneignung - Bildung. Sozialraumforschung und Sozialraumarbeit, vol 15. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02120-7_3

Gheradi, S. (2001). From Organizational learning to practice-based knowing, Human Relations, 54(1), 131-139, DOI: 10.1177/0018726701541016

Harteis, C., & Billett, S. (2008). The workplace as learning environment: Introduction. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(4), 209-212.

Hersom, H., & Koudahl, P. (2017). Ind i praksis: praksisinddragelse og differentiering i erhvervsuddannelserne. Praxis.

Jørgensen, C. H., & Warring, N. (2022). Arbejdslivets læringsmiljøer. Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv, 24(1), 25-38. DOI: 10.7146/tfa.v24i1.132593

Kompetencesekretariatet (2021). Læringsmiljø: Når læring er en del af hverdagen, lokaliseret d. 8/11-24: https://kompetenceudvikling.dk/inspiration/laeringsmiljo-nar-laering-er-del-af-hverdagen/

Larsen, H. H., & Svabo, C. (2002). Metoder til at fremme læring på jobbet. I Fra kursus til kompetenceudvikling på jobbet (1 udg., s. 273-384). Djøf Forlag.

Latour, B. (2005) En ny sociologi for et nyt samfund – introduktion til Aktør-Netværk-Teori, Akademisk Forlag

Nicolini, D., Gherardi, S., Yanow, D., (eds.) (2003). Knowing in Organizations: A Practice-based Approach. Armonk, NY: ME Sharpe

Ramian, Knud (2012). Casestudiet i praksis. 2. udg. København, Hans Reitzel.

Schad, M., & Jones, W. M. (2020). The maker movement and education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2019.1688739

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Svabo, C. (2009) Materiality in a practice-based approach, The Learning Organization, 16(2) 360-370. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470910974153

Svabo, C., Larsen, D. M., Borch, K. B., Svendsen, M. W. H., & Kristensen, M. A. (2024). STEM-didaktik: Med fokus på matematik til grundskole, gymnasie og dagtilbud. Forskningscenter for Naturvidenskabelig Uddannelse og Formidling, Syddansk Universitet.

Svabo, C., & Littrup, S. L. (2020). Interaktive arkitekturer: Oplevelsen af teknologisk mediering i hverdagens rum. I Andreasen, R. Pedersen, R. & Svabo, C. (red.), Digitale liv: Brugere, platforme og selvfremstillinger (s. 31-48). Samfundslitteratur. https://samfundslitteratur.dk/bog/digitale-liv

Sørensen, E. (2009). The Materiality of Learning: Technology and Knowledge in Educational Practice (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576362

Wenger, E. (2004). Praksisfællesskaber.[Communities of Practice], Hans Reitzels forlag.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

Christensen, M., Larsen, D. M., Auning, C., & Svabo, C. (2026). The Makerspace as a collegial and technologically mediated learning environment: A practice-oriented analysis of workplace-based learning at a vocational school . Learning Tech, 10(17), 26. https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v10i17.151691