The Recuperation of Climate Engagement
A Dispositif Analysis of the Carbon-Tracking App OneClimate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v3i1.167400Keywords:
climate engagement, digital capitalism, carbon tracking apps, dispositif analysis, walkthrough methodAbstract
Many of the most pressing issues of our time are consequences of the way our global economy is organized. As such they call for forms of collective engagement that transcend the level of individual efforts. However, many political imperatives addressing these problems are directed at the individual: Reduce your carbon footprint! Practice social distancing! Such imperatives undermine collective efforts by undercutting the search for a collective response with a direct call for individual action. Theoreticians like Slavoj Žižek or Shoshana Zuboff have pointed to capitalism’s self-enhancing tendencies to appropriate resistive impulses as market opportunities. Current digital capitalism’s appropriation strategies often connect to individualistic imperatives, and smartphone applications have become essential vectors in this. Carbon tracking apps, for example, are enticing individuals to cut down on carbon emissions by measuring their carbon footprint. We analyse one such carbon tracking app, OneClimate, by systematically stepping through its interface. Such walkthrough creates a data basis of screenshots and field notes that allows for a reconstruction of the app’s structure and functions, the intended use, and the ideal user. Our analysis then exposes the app as a micro-dispositif, i.e., as a sociocultural artefact that aligns the self-governance of individuals with the requirements of neoliberal governance. While providing us with practical means for individual little action for the better, it pushes aside the felt need for system-challenging collective engagement and theorising. Through this offering of a quiet conscience, our empathy with Gaia, our capacity to mourn its destruction and to feel guilty and ashamed for being part of it, is hijacked, reoriented towards the status quo, and further capitalized on.
References
Anders, G. (1956). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Bertelsmann-Club Buchgemeinschaft Donauland Kremayr & Scheriau. https://doi.org/10.17104/9783406704208
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Eine sanfte Gewalt: Pierre Bourdieu im Gespräch mit Irene Dölling und Margareta Steinrücke [A gentle violence: Pierre Bourdieu in conversation with Irene Dölling and Margareta Steinrücke]. In I. Dölling & B. Krais (Hrsg.), Ein alltägliches Spiel. Geschlechterkonstruktionen in der sozialen Praxis (pp. 218–230). Suhrkamp. https://www.deutsche-digitale-bibliothek.de/item/MQTU7SCTOGE2IGSWI34X7TG2LWRP3YWD
Burgess, J. & Baym, N.K. (2020). Twitter: A biography. NYU Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479841806.001.0001
Bührmann, A. D. & Schneider, W. (2012). Vom Diskurs zum Dispositiv: Eine Einführung in die Dispositivanalyse [from discourse to dispositif: An introduction to dispositif analysis] (2nd ed.). transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839408186
Debord, G. (1970). Society of the spectacle. Black & Red.
Deleuze, G. (2016). Desire and pleasure. In N. Morar, T. Nail, & D. Smith (Eds.), Between Deleuze and Foucault (pp. 223–231). Edinburgh University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474415095-015
Duttweiler, S. (2007). Sein Glück machen: Arbeit am Glück als neoliberale Regierungstechnologie. [Making one's happiness: Work on happiness as neo-liberal government technology]. UVK.
Ende, M. (1984). The Neverending Story. Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Pantheon Books
Foucault, M. (1980). The confession of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews & other writings by Michel Foucault 1972–1977 (pp. 194–228). Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège De France, 1977–1978. Picador.
Li, S. & Liu, X. (2025). Exploring the influencing factors of carbon footprint tracking application usage intention: A combined UTAUT and NAM approach. IEEE Access, 13, 316–325. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3523102
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816675438
Machado de Oliveira, V. (2021). Hospicing modernity: Facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism. North Atlantic Books.
Meister, M. & Slunecko, T. (2021). Digitale Dispositive psychischer Gesundheit: Eine Analyse der Resilienz-App ‚SuperBetter‘ [Digital dispositives of mental health: An analysis of the resilience app 'SuperBetter']. Zeitschrift für qualitative Forschung, 22(2), 242–265. https://doi.org/10.3224/zqf.v22i2.05
Meister, M., Pritz, S., Przyborski, A. & Slunecko, T. (2025). Subjektfiguren der Gefühls-vermessung: Zur Bildlichkeit von Mood Tracking-Apps [Subject figures in the measurement of emotions: On the imagery of mood tracking apps]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(2), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.2.4394
Møller, K. & Robards, B. (2019). Walking Through, Going Along and Scrolling Back: Ephemeral mobilities in digital ethnography. Nordicom Review, 40(1), 95–109. http://doi-org.10.2478/nor-2019-0016
Neckel, S., Besedovsky, N., Boddenberg, M., Hasenfratz, M., Pritz, S. & Wiegand, T. (2018). Die Gesellschaft der Nachhaltigkeit: Umrisse eines Forschungsprogramms [The society of sustainability: Outlines of a research program]. transcript. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839441947
Nehring, D. & Röcke, A. (2024). Self-optimisation: Conceptual, discursive and historical perspectives. Current Sociology, 72(6), 1069–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921221146575
Nielsen, K. S., Brick, C., Hofmann, W., Joanes, T., Lange, F., & Gwozdz, W. (2022). The motivation–impact gap in pro-environmental clothing consumption. Nature Sustainability, 5(8), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00888-7
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. Routledge.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511752179
Schaupp, S. (2019). Die totale Evaluation: Skizze zu einer materialistischen Dispositivanalyse [Total evaluation: Outline of a materialist dispositif analysis]. In D. Rode, & M. Stern (Eds.), Self-Tracking, Selfies, Tinder und Co. (pp. 225–248). Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839439081-010
Schulz, J. (2019). Klicklust und Verfügbarkeitszwang. Techno-affektive Gefüge einer neuen digitalen Hörigkeit [The urge to click and the compulsion to be available: Techno-affective structures of a new digital subservience]. In R. Mühlhoff, A. Breljak, & J. Slaby (Eds.), Affekt Macht Netz (pp. 131–154). transcript. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839444399-006
Slunecko, T. (2020). Tracking one’s own path: A methodological leitmotif of cultural psychology. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 54(1), 196–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09479-2
Slunecko, T. (2024a). Psychotherapy. In U. Wolfradt, L. Allolio-Näcke & P.S. Ruppel (Eds.) Cultural Psychology: An Introduction (pp. 359–366). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45155-4_35
Slunecko, T. (2024b). The taming of the shrooms: Understanding current discursive struggles over the psychedelic in the light of their historical antecedents. Journal of Psychedelic Studies, 9(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1556/2054.2024.00417
Slunecko, T. & Chlouba, L. (2021). Meditation in the age of its technological mimicry: A dispositiv analysis of mindfulness applications. International Review of Theoretical Psychologies, 1(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v1i1.127079
Tol, R. S. (2023). A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change. Energy Policy, 185, Article 113922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113922
Voill, M. & Peraus, P. (2024). Die Co2-Lüge [film]. Arte.
Wackernagel, M. (1994). Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: A tool for planning toward sustainability [Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia]. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0088048
Wackernagel, M. & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers.
Wacquant, L. (2015). For a sociology of flesh and blood. Qualitative Sociology, 38, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9291-y
Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Christoph Gaßner, Thomas Slunecko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IRTP operates based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but authors are free to subsequently publish their work. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).
All content published in IRTP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license allows authors and readers to share and adapt content for non-commercial purposes, provided that they abide by the following terms:
- Give credit to the original author(s)/creator(s) and attribution parties (i.e., IRTP);
- Provide a link to the original source, to the extent practicable;
- Include the copyright notice and/or indicate the corresponding Creative Commons license;
- Indicate what, if any, adaptations were made to the original; and
- Share adapted content under the same license as the original.
Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the various Creative Commons licenses. Readers are advised to consult the licensing information embedded in each published work to ensure that they are familiar with the terms of use that apply.