The Accomplishment and Future Study of Disability Identity Research in the Japanese Context
A Cross-Section of Psychology and Disability Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v3i1.167390Keywords:
disability identity, disability studies, narrative, JapanAbstract
This study highlights the accomplishments of previous research on disability identity in the Japanese context. Disability identity is the belief that people with disabilities view disability as a positive and essential aspect of their sense of belonging to the disability community. Value-change theory in rehabilitation psychology implies the current disability identity, suggesting that people with disabilities have favorable attitudes toward themselves. However, this theory overlooks the uniqueness of their impairments. Disability identity emphasizes that disability has personal, collective, and political implications. Disability culture (e.g., “deaf” and anti-eugenic discourse) and disability policy encourage people with disabilities to narrate their disability-related experiences for themselves and the public. The lack of concrete regulations in Japan’s Disability Discrimination Act enables them to create diverse narratives. Their involvement in disability-related activities changes depending on their social and political contexts. Online platforms can serve as venues where users can share their experiences. In future, the generativity concept can contribute to understanding how disability identity is shaped across generations, while respecting differences among generations in their sense of belonging to the disability community. Finally, disability identity should not be overemphasized, as it may risk negating other important aspects of the person.
References
Andrews, E. E. (2020). Disability as diversity: Developing cultural competence. Oxford University Press.
Awad, S. H., Wagoner, B., & Glaveanu, V. (2017). The street art of resistance. In N. Chaudhary, P. Hviid, G. Marsico, & J. Villadsen (Eds.), Resistance in everyday life (pp. 161–180). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3581-4_13
Botha, S. C., & Harvey, C. (2024). Doing difference differently: Identity (re)constructions of adults with acquired disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 69(3), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000541
Brubaker, R., & Cooper, F. (2000). Beyond “identity.” Theory and Society 29, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007068714468
Cabinet Office of Japan. (2023). Annual report on disability policy in Japan. https://www8.cao.go.jp/shougai/whitepaper/r05hakusho/zenbun/index-pdf.html
Chapman, M. (2021). Representation and resistance: A qualitative study of narratives of Deaf cultural identity. Culture & Psychology, 27(3), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x21993794
Chaudhary, N., Hviid, P., Marsico, G., & Villadsen, J. (Eds.). (2017). Resistance in everyday life. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3581-4
Darling, R. B. (2013). Disability and identity: Negotiating self in a changing society. Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781626370951
Dembo, T., Leviton, G. L., & Wright, B. A. (1956). Adjustment to misfortune: A problem of social-psychological rehabilitation. Artificial Limbs, 3, 4–62.
Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations. https://social.desa.un.org/issues/disability/crpd/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities-crpd
Dolezal, L. (2017). Representing posthuman embodiment: Considering disability and the case of Aimee Mullins. Women's Studies, 46(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497878.2017.1252569
Dunn, D. S., & Burcaw, S. (2013). Disability identity: Exploring narrative accounts of disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 58(2), 148–157. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0031691
Dunn, D. S., & Elliott, T. R. (2005). Revisiting a constructive classic: Wright's “Physical disability: A psychosocial approach”. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.183
Ehde, D. M., Wegener, S. T., Williams, R. M., Ephraim, P. L., Stevenson, J. E., Isenberg, P. J., & MacKenzie, E. J. (2013). Developing, testing, and sustaining rehabilitation interventions via participatory action research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(1), S30–S42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.025
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle: Selected papers. International Universities Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/21674086.1960.11926165
Forber-Pratt, A. J. (2019). (Re)defining disability culture: Perspectives from the Americans with disabilities act generation. Culture & Psychology, 25(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X18799714
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Lyew, D. A., Mueller, C., & Samples, L. B. (2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62(2), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000134
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Merrin, G. J., Mueller, C. O., Price, L. R., & Kettrey, H. H. (2020). Initial factor exploration of disability identity. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000308
Forber-Pratt, A. J., Price, L. R., Merrin, G. J., Hanebutt, R. A., & Fairclough, J. A. (2022). Psychometric properties of the Disability Identity Development Scale: Confirmatory factor and bifactor analyses. Rehabilitation Psychology, 67(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000445
Forber-Pratt, A. J., & Zape, M. P. (2017). Disability identity development model: Voices from the ADA-generation. Disability and Health Journal, 10(2), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.12.013
Frank, G. (1988). Beyond stigma: Visibility and self-empowerment of persons with congenital limb deficiencies. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1988.tb02051.x
Gill, C. J. (1997). Four types of integration in disability identity development. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 9(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1052-2263(97)00020-2
Gill, C. J. (2001). Divided understanding: The social experience of disability. In G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, & M. Bury (Eds.), Handbook of disability studies (pp. 351–369). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976251.n14
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
Goodley, D., & Lawthom, R. (2006). Disability and psychology: Critical introductions and reflections. Palgrave. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-12098-4
Groomes, D. A. G., & Linkowski, D. C. (2007). Examining the structure of the revised acceptance disability scale. Journal of Rehabilitation, 73, 3–9.
Grue, J. (2016). The problem with inspiration porn: A tentative definition and a provisional critique. Disability & Society, 31(6), 838–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2016.1205473
Hahn, H. D., & Belt, T. L. (2004). Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of disabled activists. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45(4), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404500407
Hankó, C., Pohárnok, M., Lénárd, K., & Bíró, B. (2022). Motherhood experiences of visually impaired and normally sighted women. Human Arenas, 7(1), 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00276-9
Heffernan, G., & Nixon, E. (2023). Experiences of hearing children of deaf parents in Ireland. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 28(4), 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad018
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1998). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203135457
Jones, D. R. (2022). Reclaiming disabled creativity: How cultural models make legible the creativity of people with disabilities. Culture & Psychology, 28(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X211066816
Linkowski, D. C. (1971). A scale to measure acceptance of disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 14(4), 236–244. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1972-23466-001
Millar, N., & Vione, K. C. (2024). Social identity of codas in relation to family identity. Theory and Practice in Child Development, 4(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.46303/tpicd.2024.11
McCarthy, H. (2011). A modest festschrift and insider perspective on Beatrice Wright’s contributions to rehabilitation theory and practice. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 54(2), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355210386971
Morioka, J. (2009). From the liberation theory of the disability to “the desire to the other.” Forum on Modern Education, 18, 45–62. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/hets/18/0/18_KJ00009887647/_pdf/-char/ja
Nario-Redmond, M. R., & Oleson, K. C. (2015). Disability group identification and disability-rights advocacy: Contingencies among emerging and other adults. Emerging Adulthood, 4(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167696815579830
Olkin, R., & Pledger, C. (2003). Can disability studies and psychology join hands? American Psychologist, 58, 296–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.58.4.296
Reher, S., & Evans, E. (2024). Someone like me? Disability identity and representation perceptions. Political Behavior, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09969-z
Södergren., J., & Vallström, N. (2023) Disability in influencer marketing: A complex model of disability representation, Journal of Marketing Management, 39, 1012–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2022.2144418
Tagaki, M. (2016). Narratives of ambivalent meanings of acquired physical disability in Japan. Sage Open, 6(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244016666310
Tagaki, M. (2021a). Action research on meaning-making at residents’ meetings for local disability policy. Japanese Psychological Research, 63, 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12372
Tagaki, M. (2021b). Meaning of disability and management of its visibility: A review of a qualitative inquiry on people with oligodactyly. Integrative Psychology &. Behavioral Science, 55, 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09597-2
Tagaki, M. (2023a). The meanings of disability-related activities and disability identities: A qualitative analysis of narratives of people with physical disabilities in Japan. Culture & Psychology, 31(2), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X231201388
Tagaki, M. (2023b). Implications of Beatrice Wright's works for disability identity. In Osaka Metropolitan University School of Social Welfare and Education (Ed.), SDGs for well-being (pp. 95–109). Seseragi-shuppan.
Tagaki, M. (2025). Japanese disability discrimination act: Policy and discourse. In G. Bennett, & E. Goodall (Eds.), The Palgrave encyclopedia of disability. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40858-8_14-1
Wagner W., Holtz P., & Kashima Y. (2009). Construction and deconstruction of essence in representing social groups: Identity projects, stereotyping, and racism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 39, 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00408.x
Weeber, J. E. (2004). Disability community leaders’ disability identity development: A journey of integration and expansion [PhD dissertation, North Carolina State University]. https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/a3b962c2-d923-49f8-8289-c157e82b5e1b/content
World Health Organization. (2013). How to use the ICF: A practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
Wright, B. A. (1960). Physical disability: A psychological approach. Harper & Row. https://doi.org/10.1037/10038-000
Wright, B. A. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. https://doi.org/10.1037/10589-000
Wright, B. A. (1991). Labeling: The need for greater person-environment individuation. In C. R. Snyder & D. R. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 469–487). Pergamon Press.
Wright, B. A. (2009). Interview by S. McLelland, A. Rutherford, M. Fine & S. Opotow [Video]. Psychology’s feminist voices oral history and online archive project. https://feministvoices.com/files/profiles/pdf/Beatrice-Wright_final.pdf
Wright, B. A., & Lopez, S. J. (2002). Widening the diagnostic focus: A case for including human strengths and environmental resources. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 26–44). Oxford University Press.
Wu, Y.-J., Chou, C.-C., Chronister, J., Hsu, C.-L., Zheng, M. Q., & Tobias, W. A. (2024). Disability Identity Development Scale: A validation study among college students with disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 70(2), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000564
Yokotsuka, K. (1975). Mother! Don’t kill. Suzusawa-shoten.
Young, S. (2014). “I’m not your inspiration, thank you very much” [Video]. TED. http://www.ted.com/talks/stella_young_i_m_not_your_inspiration_thank_you_very_much
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Masakuni Tagaki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IRTP operates based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but authors are free to subsequently publish their work. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).
All content published in IRTP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license allows authors and readers to share and adapt content for non-commercial purposes, provided that they abide by the following terms:
- Give credit to the original author(s)/creator(s) and attribution parties (i.e., IRTP);
- Provide a link to the original source, to the extent practicable;
- Include the copyright notice and/or indicate the corresponding Creative Commons license;
- Indicate what, if any, adaptations were made to the original; and
- Share adapted content under the same license as the original.
Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the various Creative Commons licenses. Readers are advised to consult the licensing information embedded in each published work to ensure that they are familiar with the terms of use that apply.
