Collectivity and the Boundary Subject
Between Collective and Individual Subjectivity in Psychology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v3i1.167388Keywords:
collectivity, subjectivity, psychology, anxietyAbstract
Across the field of educational and social psychology, the term ‘collective(s)’ has proven to be an increasingly predominating concept in analyzing the preconditions of mental health and wellbeing. However, with the prevalence of self-help practices and literature, we are often left with an unsatisfactory negativity of collectivity, and the general question of whether or how to conceptualize activities of the solitary individual as a social practice. When psychologies deal with collectives rather than collectivity, the collective status of individual subjectivity often remains unaddressed, and this negativity forms the outset for this paper. The paper thus explores the implications of leaving individual subjectivity in the shadows of favoring collectives and collective subjectivity, thus questioning whether the subject as an individual unit is truly non-collective, or if we can articulate collectivity and subjectivity in a way that bridges this gap. To explore this issue, the paper rearticulates the notion of collectivity through dialogical engagements with different receptions of the ‘collective condition’ of subjectivity, i.e., as ideology (Zizek), boundary objectivity (Nissen), and hereditary sin (Kierkegaard). Concepts of uncollectivity and boundary subjectivity are presented as means to overcome the psychological implications when collectivity is only grasped through the external contradiction of individual and collective subjectivity.
References
Bank, M. (2016). Enacting (post)psychological standards in social work: From regimes of visibility to user-driven standards of affective subjectification. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), pp. 202–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316634216
Batmaz, S. (2014). The conceptual foundations of metacognitive therapy. Journal of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Research (3), 11–17.
Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001
Breinholst, S., Christiansen, B. M., & Esbjørn, B. H. (2018). Kognitiv adfærdsterapi med børn [Cognitive behavioral therapy with children]. Pædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift, 55(1).
Brinkmann, S. (2016a). Diagnostic cultures: A cultural approach to the pathologization of modern life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315576930
Brinkmann, S. (2016b). Psychology as normative science. In J. Valsiner, G. Marsico, N. Chaudhary, T. Sato, & V. Dazzani (Eds.), Psychology as a science of human being: The Yokohama Manifesto (Annals of Theoretical Psychology, Vol. 13, pp. 3–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21094-0_1
Brown, S., Reavey, P., Kanyeredzi, A. & Batty, R. (2013). Transformations of self and sexuality: Psychologically modifed experiences in the context of forensic mental health. Health, 18(3), 240–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459313497606
Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power — Theories in Subjection. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503616295
Butler, J. (2021a). Recognition and the social bond: A response to Axel Honneth. In H. Ikäheimo, K. Leopold & T. Stahl (Eds.), Recognition and Ambivalence: Judith Butler, Axel Honneth, and Beyond (pp. 31–54). Columbia University Press.
Butler, J. (2021b). Recognition and mediation: A second reply to Axel Honneth. In H. Ikäheimo, K. Leopold & T. Stahl (Eds.) Recognition and Ambivalence: Judith Butler, Axel Honneth, and Beyond (pp. 61-68). Columbia University Press.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the Mind: How Psychology Found its Language. Sage Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221815
De Vos, J. (2013). Psychologization and the Subject of Late Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269225
De Vos, J. (2013). Fake Subjectivities: Interpassivity from (neuro)psychologization to digitalization. Continental Thought & Theory: A Journal of Intellectual Freedom, 2(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.26021/267
Dreier, O. (2007). Generality and particularity of knowledge. In V. V. Deventer, M. T. Blanche, E. Fourie, & P. Segalo (Eds.), Citizen City. Between Constructing Agent and Constructed Agency (pp. 188-196). Captus Press.
Foucault, M. (1994). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. Vintage Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315660301
Hacking, I. (1996). The looping effects of human kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate (pp. 351–383). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198524021.003.0012
Hansen, H. R. (2011). (Be)longning – Forståelse af mobning som længsel efter at høre til [(Be)longing – Understanding bullying as a longing to belong]. Psyke & Logos, 32, 480–495. https://doi.org/10.7146/pl.v32i2.8733
Haug, W. F. (1979). Individets borgerlige privatform og samfundets omverdensform [The individual’s bourgeois private form and society’s external form]. In O. Dreier (Ed.), Den Kritiske Psykologi (pp. 159-174). Rhodos.
Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Foundations of Psychology]. Campus Verlag.
Holzkamp-Osterkamp, U. (1979). Erkendelse, emotionalitet, handleevne [Cognition, emotion, agency]. In O. Dreier (Ed), Den kritiske psykologi (pp. 102–133). Rhodos.
Højrup, T. (2002). Dannelsens Dialektik [The Dialectic of Bildung]. Museum Tusculaneum.
Illouz, E. (2008). Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520941311
Kierkegaard, S. (1941). The Sickness Unto Death. Princeton University Press.
Kierkegaard, S. (1980). The Concept of Anxiety. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700043567
Nissen, M. (2005). The subjectivity of participation: Sketch of a theory. Critical Psychology, 15, 151-179.
Nissen, M. (2008). Objektivitet og subjektivering i socialt arbejde [Objectivity and subjectification in social work]. Nordiske Udkast, 36(1/2), 16–56. https://doi.org/10.7146/nu.v36i1.7341
Nissen, M. (2012). The Subjectivity of Participation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230367890
Nissen, M. (2016). Standards and standpoints: Why and how standards, and studying them, imply critique. Theory & Psychology, 26(2), 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316632934
Nissen, M. (2018). Who,'we'? The Constitution and the Singular Identity of the Collective. Subjectivity, 11(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41286-018-0061-2
Nissen, M. (2019). Remembering, rewriting, rearticulating, resituation motivation. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 16, 468–502.
Nissen, M. (2020). Critical Psychology: The most recent version (soon to be replaced), illustrated by the problem of motivation. In L. Malich, & V. Balz (Eds.), Psychologie und Kritik der Psychologisierung nach 1945. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29486-1_4
Nissen, M. (2023). Rearticulating Motives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43494-5
Osterkamp, U. (2009). Knowledge and Practice in Critical Psychology. Theory & Psychology, 19(2), 167–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309103538
Pasgaard, J. (2025). A Critical Disquisition on the Ideology of Anxiety. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 27, 1–26. https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/144821
Rapee, R. M., & Thastum, M. (n.d.). Chilled: arbejdshæfte for unge [Chilled: Workbook for Adolescents] (2nd ed.). Center for Psykologisk Behandling til Børn og Unge (CEBU), Psykologisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet.
Rapee, R. M., & Thastum, M. (n.d.). Cool Kids chilled: terapeutens manual [Cool Kids Chilled: Therapist’s Manual] (2. Ed.). Center for Psykologisk Behandling til Børn og Unge (CEBU), Psykologisk Institut, Aarhus Universitet.
Rose, N. (1996). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511752179
Rose, N. (2001). Normality and Pathology in a Biological Age. Outlines Critical Practice Studies, 3(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.7146/ocps.v3i1.5126
Ryan, R. M., & E. L. Deci (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Schraube, E. (2015). Why theory matters: Analytical strategies of critical psychology. Estudos de Psicologia 32(3), 533–545. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-166x2015000300018
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
Søndergaard, D. M. (2010). Peer Bullying: Anxiety of Social Exclusion in a Real- Virtually Mediated School Life. In P. L. Jeffery (ed.), Proceedings of the AARE Conference – Canberra 2009 (pp. 1–13). Australian Association for Research in Education. http://www.aare.edu.au/09pap/abs09.htm
Thastum, M. (2018). Angstlidelser hos børn [Anxiety disorders in children]. Pædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift, 55(1), 6–19.
Žižek, S. (1994). Mapping Ideology. Verso.
Žižek, S. (2006a). How to Read Lacan. Granta Books.
Žižek, S. (2006b). Objet a in Social Links. In J. Clemens, & R. Griggs (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis: Reflections on Seminar XVII. Duke University Press Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11vc7fb.9
Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. Verso. https://doi.org/10.1017/hgl.2015.11
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jeppe Pasgaard
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IRTP operates based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but authors are free to subsequently publish their work. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).
All content published in IRTP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license allows authors and readers to share and adapt content for non-commercial purposes, provided that they abide by the following terms:
- Give credit to the original author(s)/creator(s) and attribution parties (i.e., IRTP);
- Provide a link to the original source, to the extent practicable;
- Include the copyright notice and/or indicate the corresponding Creative Commons license;
- Indicate what, if any, adaptations were made to the original; and
- Share adapted content under the same license as the original.
Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the various Creative Commons licenses. Readers are advised to consult the licensing information embedded in each published work to ensure that they are familiar with the terms of use that apply.
