Joyless Laughter

Thaumazein at a World on Fire

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v3i1.167387

Keywords:

philosophy of laughter, thaumazein, political humor, irony, Henri Bergson

Abstract

Why theorize about political humor in a world that appears to have lost its mind? I argue that humorous laughter makes it possible to think beyond the ordinary by producing an experience of alienation from everyday habits and customs that would otherwise go unquestioned. However, this same possibility might lead to anxiety and awe that pushes us to quickly resolve and conceal the contingency of our habits shown when we laugh at them. This double-facedness of the potentiality of humor and laughter is related to the philosophical concept of thaumazein - wonder and awe produced when the obvious is suddenly seen as lacking any self-evident reason for being the way it is. I argue that in order to grasp the various functions that humor and laughter can perform, it is necessary to develop an ironic consciousness that is able to avoid falling into the trap of nihilistic relativization, but also to avoid the ideal of constructing knowledge that closes the door to all kinds of ambiguities and contradictions. In this way, the study of political humor, even in its extreme and reactionary forms, can help us to understand the ways in which common sense is contested and constructed collectively.

Author Biography

Augusto Rodríguez-Paniagua, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile

Augusto Rodríguez-Paniagua is a Phd student of Psychology at the Pontifical Catholic University of Chile. He is interested in studying the role humor and laughter have in the transformation of the ways people engage with politics as well as developing ways in which to understand the genesis of political attitudes in everyday interactions. He is also interested in reexamining classical theories of laughter and humor, mainly Bergson’s and Bakhtin’s and how they can inform today’s apparent blurring of the line between “serious” and “non-serious” political discourse. His latest paper on how laughter is used to surreptitiously transform and subvert the normative orientations of everyday interactions is currently under revision.

References

Aalberg, T., Strömbäck, J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2012). The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911427799

Askanius, T. (2021). on frogs, monkeys, and execution memes: Exploring the humor-hate nexus at the intersection of neo-nazi and alt-right movements in sweden. Television and New Media, 22(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982234

Bakhtin, M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1968)

Barker, K. A. (2017). Of Wonder: Thomas Hobbes’s political appropriation of thaumazein. Political Theory, 45(3), 362–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591715617513

Bergson, H. (1975). Dreams (H. Wildon Carr, Trans.). In K. Ansell-Pearson, & M. Kolkman (Eds.), Mind-Energy: Lectures and Essays (pp. 104–134). Greenwood Press. (Original work published 1920)

Bergson, H. (1988). Matter and Memory (N. M. Paul & W.S. Palmer, Trans.). Zone Books. (Original work published 1896)

Bergson, H. (2008). Laughter: An Essay on the meaning of the comic (C. Brereton & F, Rothwell, Trans.). ARC Manor. https://doi.org/10.1037/13772-000 (Original work published 1900)

Billig, M. (2005). Laughter and Ridicule: towards a social critique of humour. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211779

Bulatović, M. (2019). The imitation game: The memefication of political discourse. European View, 18(2), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1781685819887691

Burgers, C., & Brugman, B. C. (2022). How satirical news impacts affective responses, learning, and persuasion: A three-level random-effects meta-analysis. Communication Research, 49(7), 966–993. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211032100

Capelos, T., Salmela, M., Talalakina, A., & Cotena, O. (2024). Ressentiment in the manosphere: Conceptions of morality and avenues for resistance in the incel hatred pipeline. Philosophies, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9020036

Čeika, J. (2020). The Simpsons and the Death of Parody [Video]. Youtube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hi_fxwLBSFo

Doona, J. (2018). Political comedy engagement: Identity and community construction. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 23(4), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549418810081

Doona, J. (2020). News satire engagement as a transgressive space for genre work. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877919892279

Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is there no alternative? Zero Books.

Ford, R. (2018). Life’s joke: Bergson, comedy, and the meaning of laugther. In L. L. Moland (Ed.), All Too Human: Laughter, Humor, and Comedy in Nineteenth-Century Philosophy (pp. 175–194). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91331-5_11

Freud, S. (1991). El chiste y su relación con lo inconciente (J. L. Etchverry, Trans.). In J. Strachey (Ed.), Obras Completas Tomo VIII (pp. 1–226). Amorrortu. (Original work published 1905)

Freud, S. (1992). El Humor (J. L. Etchverry, Trans.). In J. Strachey (Ed.), Obras Completas Tomo XXI (pp. 153–162). Amorrortu. (Original work published 1927)

Giamario, P. T. (2020). Laughter as dissensus: Kant and the limits of normative theorizing around laughter. Contemporary Political Theory, 20, 795–814. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-020-00447-9

Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). Wonder: The extraordinary power of an ordinary experience. Bloomsbury.

Griffero, T. (2021). Weak monstrosity: Schelling’s uncanny and atmospheres of uncanniness. Studi Di Estetica, 49(20), 105–137. https://doi.org/10.7413/18258646164

Hakoköngäs, E., Halmesvaara, O., & Sakki, I. (2020). Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in finland. Social Media and Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575

Held, K. (2005). Wonder, time, and idealization. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 9(2), 185–196. http://tesis.udea.edu.co/dspace/bitstream/10495/12714/1/Escobar_2002_AsombroTiempoIdealizacion.pdf

Holm, N. (2017). Humour as Politics: The Political Aesthetics of Contemporary Comedy. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50950-1

Jankélévitch, V. (2020). La ironía (R. Pochtar, Trans). Taurus. (Original work published 1936)

Kligler-Vilenchik, N., Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., Boczkowski, P. J., Hayashi, K., Mitchelstein, E., & Villi, M. (2022). Youth political talk in the changing media environment: A cross-national typology. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 27(3), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211055686

Lipps, T. (2015). El humor y lo cómico: Un estudio estético-psicológico (C. Cabrera, Trans.). Editorial Herder. (Original work published 1898)

Llewelyn, J. (2001). On the saying that philosophy begins with thaumazein. Afterall Journal, 4, 48–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/aft.4.20711438

Luebke, S. M. (2021). Political authenticity: Conceptualization of a popular term. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(3), 635–653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220948013

Petrović, T. (2018). Political parody and the politics of ambivalence. Annual Review of Anthropology, 47(1), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-100148

Phillips, T., & Rangel, C. (2025). ‘He is not a gang member’: Outrage as US deports makeup artist to El Salvador prison for crown tattoos. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/01/its-a-tradition-outrage-in-venezuela-as-us-deports-makeup-artist-for-religious-tattoos

Plesa, P. (2024). Neonihilism: Meaninglessness and irony in neoliberal capitalism. Theory and Psychology, 34(5), 611–629. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241258471

Rubenstein, M.-J. (2008). Strange wonder: The closure of metaphysics and the opening of awe. Columbia University Press.

Sakki, I., & Martikainen, J. (2021). Mobilizing collective hatred through humour: Affective–discursive production and reception of populist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60(2), 610–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12419

Walter, N., Cody, M. J., Xu, L. Z., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). A priest, a rabbi, and a minister walk into a bar: A meta-analysis of humor effects on persuasion. Human Communication Research, 44(4), 343–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqy005

Wilson, J. (2017). Hiding in plain sight: How the “alt-right” is weaponizing irony to spread fascism. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/may/23/alt-right-online-humor-as-a-weapon-facism

Zupančič, A. (2008). The odd one in: On Comedy. MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-08

How to Cite

Rodríguez-Paniagua, A. (2026). Joyless Laughter: Thaumazein at a World on Fire. International Review of Theoretical Psychologies, 3(1), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v3i1.167387

Issue

Section

Theorising Lived Meaning and Subjectivity