Critical Psychology and Cultural Psychology
Common Concerns – Divergences – Productive Linkages
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/irtp.v3i1.167381Keywords:
culturalism, Critical Psychology as Marxist-based historical science of the subject, Cultural-Historical School/Theory, Cultural psychology in a subject-scientific perspectiveAbstract
Standing in the tradition of the Cultural-Historical School, which is unanimously recognised as an essential contribution to cultural psychology, German Critical Psychology is also repeatedly attributed to this field. Although commonalities undoubtedly exist between the subject-scientific perspective of the latter and cultural-psychological views, characteristic differences must also be highlighted – and this also concerns the reception of Vygotsky’s and his collaborators’ work: Both the Cultural-Historical and the Critical-Psychological approaches oppose any ‘culturalist’ dissolution of the materialist concept of societal relations/practice into either fuzzy or straightforwardly idealistic notions of culture as a system of linguistic-symbolic meanings, and any dichotomisation between the naturalness and the societality of human development of consciousness. Marxist Critical Psychology focuses on the capitalist mode of production and life with its class-specific, intersectional relations of inequality, oppression, and discrimination, which determine cultural processes and involve a contradictory interplay of possibilities and restrictions of personal agency – structural relationships that are easily ignored in idealistic (e.g. social constructivist or discourse-theoretical) conceptions of culture. When framed in a materialist way, the concept of culture can, in turn, enrich our concept of society with an action-relevant dimension by opening access to the actors' perspective on the diversity and mutability of socio-cultural codifications of life-worlds and subjectivities. In this respect, cultural theories refer to a level of research that is basically laid out, but not yet sufficiently differentiated in Critical Psychology. In order to achieve this concretisation, further elaboration of a Marxist concept of culture is needed, from which existing cultural theories can be reinterpreted and coherently integrated.
References
Ampuja, M., & Koivisto, J. (2012). Kulturstudien [Cultural Studies]. In W. F. Haug (Ed.), Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (Vol. 8/1, pp. 432–449). Argument.
Berry, J.W., Poortinga, Y.H., Breugelmans, S.M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D.L. (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology. Allyn & Bacon.
Billmann-Mahecha, E. (2003). Kulturpsychologie [Cultural psychology]. In H.-J. Ahrens (Ed.), Psychologie von A–Z. Die sechzig wichtigsten Disziplinen (pp. 96–99). Spektrum Akademischer Verlag. https://www.spektrum.de/lexikon/psychologie/kulturpsychologie/8387
Bischoff, J. (1973). Gesellschaftliche Arbeit als Systembegriff. Über wissenschaftliche Dialektik. Interpretationen zum “Kapital” (Bd. 1) [Social labor as a systemic concept. On scientific dialectics. Interpretations of “Capital” (Vol. 1)]. Verlag für das Studium der Arbeiterbewegung.
Boesch, E.E. (1991). Symbolic action theory and cultural psychology. Springer-Verlag Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84497-3
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Four lectures on mind and culture. Harvard University Press.
Candeias, M. (Ed.). (2021). Klassentheorie: Vom Making und Remaking [Class Theory: On Making and Remaking]. Argument.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
Graumann, C.-F., & Métraux, A. (1977). Die phänomenologische Orientierung in der Psychologie [The phenomenological orientation in psychology]. In K.A. Schneewind (Ed.), Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen der Psychologie (pp. 27–53). UTB Reinhardt. https://doi.org/10.30820/0942-2285-2022-1-48
Haug, W.F. (2005). High-Tech-Kapitalismus. Analysen zu Produktionsweise, Arbeit, Sexualität, Krieg und Hegemonie [High-tech capitalism. Analyses of modes of production, labor, sexuality, war, and hegemony]. Argument.
Holzkamp, K. (2015). Kann es im Rahmen der marxistischen Theorie eine Kritische Psychologie geben? [Can there be a critical psychology within the framework of Marxist theory?] In F. Haug, W. Maiers, & U. H.-Osterkamp (Eds.), Klaus Holzkamp Schriften VI: Kritische Psychologie als Subjektwissenschaft (pp. 214–241). Argument. (Original work published 1977)
Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Foundations of psychology]. Campus.
Holzkamp, K. (2013). The development of Critical Psychology as a subject science. In E. Schraube, & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject. Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 28–45). Palgrave Macmillan (Original work published 1988)
Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology: Self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube, & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject. Selected Writings of Klaus Holzkamp (A. Borehain, Trans.; pp. 233–341). Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature.
Holzkamp, K., & Schurig, V. (2015). Zur Einführung in A. N. Leontjew "Probleme der Entwicklung des Psychischen" [Introduction to A. N. Leontiev's "Problems of the development of the mind"]. In F. Haug, W. Maiers, & U. H.-Osterkamp (Eds.), Klaus Holzkamp Schriften VI: Kritische Psychologie als Subjektwissenschaft (pp. 33–74). Argument. (Original work published 1973)
Keiler, P. (1999). Feuerbach, Wygotski & Co.: Studien zur Grundlegung einer Psychologie des gesellschaftlichen Menschen [Feuerbach, Vygotsky & Co.: Studies toward the foundation of a psychology of societal man] (3rd ed.). Argument.
Keiler, P. (2012) “Kulturhistorische Theorie” und “Kulturhistorische Schule”: vom Mythos (zurück) zur Wirklichkeit [“Cultural-historical theory” and “cultural-historical school”: from myth (back) to reality]. Forum Kritische Psychologie, 56, 114–128.
Kölbl, C. (2024). The cultural-historical perspective. In U. Wolfradt, L. Allolio-Näcke, & P.S. Ruppel (Eds.). Cultural Psychology. An Introduction (pp. 15–23). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-45155-4_2
Leontjew, A. N. (1963). Probleme der Entwicklung des Psychischen [Problems of the development of the mind]. Volk und Wissen.
Lorenzer, A. (1974). Die Wahrheit der psychoanalytischen Erkenntnis. Ein historisch-materialistischer Entwurf [The truth of psychoanalytic knowledge. A historical-materialist outline]. Suhrkamp.
Maiers, W. (1993). Historische Psychologie und das Problem der menschlichen Natur: Kommt eine psychologische Subjektwissenschaft ohne Naturgeschichte aus? [Historical psychology and the problem of human nature: Can there be a psychological science of the subject without natural history?] In G. Jüttemann, & M. Sonntag (Eds.), Individuum und Geschichte. Beiträge zur Diskussion um eine "Historische Psychologie" (pp. 49–72). Asanger.
Maiers, W. (1999). Funktional-historische Analyse. In W. F. Haug (Ed.), Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (Vol. 4, pp. 1133–1143). Argument.
Maiers, W. (2019). Menschliche Subjektivität und Natur. Wissenschaftlicher Humanismus bei Karl Marx und in der Kritischen Psychologie [Human subjectivity and nature: Scientific humanism in Karl Marx and in critical psychology]. In W. Maiers, & R. Schenkel (Eds.). Marx bleibt aktuell. Perspektiven für die Einzelwissenschaften (pp. 131–148). Mitteldeutscher Verlag.
Maiers, W., & Reimer-Gordinskaya, K. (2024). Cultural psychology in a subject-scientific perspective. Annual Review of Critical Psychology: (Critical) Psychology as Politics by Other Means, 18, 115–143. https://discourseunit.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/0115_maiers_reimer_gordinskaya.pdf
Maiers, W., & Reimer-Gordinskaya, K. (2025). German critical psychology as theoretical psychology. In H. J. Stam, & H. L. de Jong (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Theoretical Psychology (pp. 388–430). Sage.
Markard, M. (2009). Einführung in die Kritische Psychologie: Grundlagen, Methoden und Problemfelder marxistischer Subjektwissenschaft [Introduction to critical psychology: Foundations, methods and problem areas of Marxist Subject science]. Argument.
Markard, M. (2020). Kritische Psychologie [Critical psychology]. In G. Mey, & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie, Vol. 1: Ansätze und Anwendungsfelder (pp. 163–184). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26887-9
Marx, K. (1969). Thesen über Feuerbach [Theses on Feuerbach]. Karl Marx/ Friedrich Engels – Werke (Vol. 3). Dietz. (Original work published 1845)
Nelson, C., Treichler, P.A., & Grossberg, L. (1992). Cultural studies: An introduction. In L. Grossberg, C. Nelson, & P. A. Treichler (Eds.), Cultural Studies (pp. 1–16). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203699140
Reimer, K., & Markard, M. (2014). German critical psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology (pp. 784–791). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7
Schwartz, T. (1992). Anthropology and psychology: An unrequited relationship. In T. Schwartz, G. M. White, & C.A. Lutz (Eds.), New Directions in Psychological Anthropology (pp. 324–349). Cambridge University Press.
Shweder, R. A. (1990). Cultural psychology — What is it? In J. W. Stigler, R. A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.). Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development (pp. 1–43). Cambridge University Press.
Staeuble, I. (2002). Wider den eurozentrischen Blick: ein kulturpsychologisches Programm für Immigrationsgesellschaften [Against the eurocentric gaze: A cultural-psychological program for immigration societies.]. In M. Hildebrand-Nilshon, K. Chung-Woon, & D. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Kultur (in) der Psychologie. Über das Abenteuer des Kulturbegriffes in der psychologischen Theoriebildung (pp. 92–106). Asanger.
Stigler, J.W., Shweder, R.A., & Herdt, G. (Eds.). (1990). Cultural psychology. Essays on comparative human development. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173728
Straub, J., & Chakkarath, P. (2010). Kulturpsychologie [Cultural psychology]. In G. Mey, & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 195–209). Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Tomberg, F. (1978). Menschliche Natur in historisch-materialistischer Definition [Human nature according to a historical-materialist definition]. In G. Rückriem, F. Tomberg, & W. Volpert (Eds.), Historischer Materialismus und menschliche Natur (pp. 42–79). Pahl-Rugenstein.
Valsiner, J. (2025). Cultural psychology: Capturing human meaning-making processes. In H.J. Stam, & H.L. de Jong (Eds.). The Sage Handbook of Theoretical Psychology (pp. 76–92). Sage.
Vygotskij, L.S. (2002). Denken und Sprechen. Psychologische Untersuchungen [Thought and speech: Psychological investigations] (J. Lompscher, & G. Rückriem, Trans.). Beltz. (Original work published 1934)
Wikipedia contributors. (2024, March 18). Kulturpsychologie [Cultural psychology]. Retrieved November 20, 2024, from https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kulturpsychologie&oldid=243224203
Wolfradt, U., Allolio-Näcke, L., & Ruppel, P.S. (Eds.). (2024). Cultural psychology. An introduction. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wolfgang Maiers
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
IRTP operates based on a non-exclusive publishing agreement, according to which the journal retains the right of first publication, but authors are free to subsequently publish their work. The copyright of all work rests with the author(s).
All content published in IRTP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This license allows authors and readers to share and adapt content for non-commercial purposes, provided that they abide by the following terms:
- Give credit to the original author(s)/creator(s) and attribution parties (i.e., IRTP);
- Provide a link to the original source, to the extent practicable;
- Include the copyright notice and/or indicate the corresponding Creative Commons license;
- Indicate what, if any, adaptations were made to the original; and
- Share adapted content under the same license as the original.
Authors are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the various Creative Commons licenses. Readers are advised to consult the licensing information embedded in each published work to ensure that they are familiar with the terms of use that apply.
