Engang slave for den retfærdige gud, nu løskøbt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/dtt.v71i2.138271Nøgleord:
Nag Hammadi, The Gospel of Judas, James, Apocalypse of James, text history, canonicityResumé
The discovery and publication of the Gospel of Judas from an unknown papyrus manuscript attracted a remarkable attention of public interest. This text is regarded as a very important contribution to our understanding, both of the figure of Judas Iscariot and of early Gnosticism. However, the same codex also contains other texts, among them one with the title Jakob (or: James). Despite the fact that this text has not reached the same degree of popularity as Judas, for future study in Gnosticism it is very likely Jakob and not the Gospel of Judas, which appears to be the most important text in Codex Tchacos. That is owing to the fact that this text together with the first Apocalypse of James from Nag Hammadi Codex V gives us a glimpse of the history and transmission of apocryphal texts in antiquity. This raises new perspectives with regard to the use in the early church of this kind of texts, especially concerning their authority and apparently non-canonical status
Downloads
Publiceret
Versioner
- 2008-04-26 (2)
- 2023-06-26 (1)
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
For årgange indtil 2008 tilhører copyright forfatteren og Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift.
For årgangene 2008-2025 tilhører copyright forfatteren og Eksistensen Akademisk.
Artikler udgivet 2008-2025 må læsere downloade, linke til, og citere. Man må ikke ændre i teksten og heller ikke videreformidle artikler eller dele af artikler til kommercielt brug.
For årgange fra 2026 tilhører copyright forfatteren.
Fra 2026 udgives artikler i Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift under en Creative Commons-licens: Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
![]()