https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/issue/feed 2025-06-10T11:33:15+02:00 Johanne Stubbe Teglbjærg Kristensen jst@teol.ku.dk Open Journal Systems <p><span class="First">D</span>anmarks førende fagteologiske tidsskrift. Udgives af Forlaget eksistensen i samarbejde med Det Teologiske Fakultet i København og Afdeling for Teologi på Aarhus Universitet.</p> <p>Tidsskriftet modtog til og med årgang 2021 støtte fra Det Frie Forskningsråd.</p> <p>Årgang 2023 støttes af FOF og Tænketanken Prospekt.</p> <p> </p> https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157465 2025-06-03T12:17:06+02:00 Johanne Stubbe Teglbjærg Kristensen henrik@eksistensen.dk 2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157467 2025-06-03T12:22:45+02:00 Kasper A. Bergholt henrik@eksistensen.dk

<p>This article applies recent translation theories to Paul’s letter to Philemon. Building on an outline of the research history and recent developments within translation studies, I argue that different perspec-tives on translation must be integrated. This means that different aspects (e.g., semantics, history, linguistics, ideology, use, function, and theology) can be emphasized when translating a text resulting in different focuses or mediations of the translation. Furthermore, I present four different translations of selected verses from the letter to Philemon. These translations are then compared and evaluated with regard to their intelligibility and credibility. The conclusion is that although different types of transla-tion may achieve different goals, some translation choices can strengthen or challenge the intelligibility and credibility of a translation.</p>

2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157469 2025-06-03T12:26:56+02:00 Mads Peter Karlsen henrik@eksistensen.dk

<p class="Keywords"><span lang="EN-GB">Following the lead of philosophers of religion Paul Ricœur and Michael Theunissen, this article revisits the long-standing, but still vital debate on how to understand the relationship between Hegel and Kierkegaard and the theological implications of this relationship. The first part of the article proposes a dialectical reading guided by a mutually critical mirroring of Kierkegaard in Hegel and Hegel in Kierkegaard. The second part of the article outlines the Hegelian preconditions of Kierkegaard’s philosophy of religion, highlighting two decisive points of intersection. The following part investigates the contrast between Hegel’s notion that in Christianity God is fully revealed and Kierkegaard’s conception of revelation as absolute paradox. This leads to a detailed consideration in the fourth and last section of how Hegel and Kierkegaard differ in their understanding of reconciliation and sin.</span></p>

2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157470 2025-06-03T12:31:36+02:00 Carsten Elmelund Petersen henrik@eksistensen.dk

<p>The article considers the notion of the right self-love in Kierkegaard’s Works of Love. Kierkegaard criticizes the intuitive love as selfish. He argues that it conflicts with the love required in the double commandment of love. The article discusses the right self-love as part of Kierkegaard’s conception of a synthesis of love, which is to love God and the neighbor. Today, it is argued, we have an increased need for a right self-love, which must be adequately related to the love of the neighbor. With a hermeneutic approach, the intuitive love can meet the demand of the double commandment of love. The right self-love can be developed in the individual person’s life history. If right self-love is balanced, it implies the synthesis of love, which involves the love for God, the love for neighbors and for oneself.</p>

2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157471 2025-06-03T13:05:58+02:00 Nete Helene Enggaard henrik@eksistensen.dk 2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157472 2025-06-03T13:15:12+02:00 Peter Lodberg henrik@eksistensen.dk 2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157473 2025-06-03T13:16:47+02:00 Nils Arne Pedersen henrik@eksistensen.dk 2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157474 2025-06-03T13:18:55+02:00 Jonas Adelin Jørgensen henrik@eksistensen.dk 2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/157475 2025-06-03T13:20:37+02:00 Anders-Christian Jacobsen henrik@eksistensen.dk 2025-06-10T00:00:00+02:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift