https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt <p><span class="First">D</span>anmarks førende fagteologiske tidsskrift. Udgives af Forlaget eksistensen i samarbejde med Det Teologiske Fakultet i København og Afdeling for Teologi på Aarhus Universitet.</p> <p>Tidsskriftet modtog til og med årgang 2021 støtte fra Det Frie Forskningsråd.</p> <p>Årgang 2023 støttes af FOF og Tænketanken Prospekt.</p> <p> </p> Eksistensen Akademisk da-DK Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 0105-3191 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152281 Johanne Stubbe Teglbjærg Kristensen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152281 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152282 Johanne Stubbe Teglbjærg Kristensen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 1 321 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152282 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152284 Johanne Stubbe Teglbjærg Kristensen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 251 253 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152284 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152285 <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><em>Abstract: </em></span>This article discusses the role of experience in Martin Luther’s <span class="s1"><em>Heidelberg Disputation </em></span>(1518). Drawing on the work of the post-hermeneutical theologian Günter Bader, the article develops Luther’s understanding of experience in a specific Hegelian sense. Hegel’s skeptical concept of experience allows for a dialectical understanding of the self-reversal of experience, which is summarized in the theological formula: “<span class="s1"><em>Erfahrung mit der Erfahrung</em></span>”. This notion of experience is further contextualized through Luther’s theology of the cross. In conclusion the article discusses a possible speculative relation between language and experience in Luther’s theology.</p> Gustav Damgaard Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 254 273 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152285 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152287 <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><em>Abstract: </em></span>This article combines a review of <span class="s1"><em>The Nordic Bible: Bible Reception in Contemporary Nordic Societies </em></span>(2023) with a brief discussion of the book. The eleven case studies draw attention to the culturalization which increasingly characterizes the status and use of the Bible in the secular Nordic countries. The analyses demonstrate how the invocation in the public debate of biblical phrases, proverbs and parables typically neglect the original, scriptural context. Thus, the pastoral power of the Bible may be activated by referring to a shared – minimal – knowledge of the book, but still presupposes a shared acknowledgement of its sacred status. This development has taken place at the same time as the population in the Nordic countries has moved away from the romantic idea of the oneness of the nation – one language, one religion, one race, one land – to a new complex national multiplicity. However, the rich analyses of the book also call for national minority groups’ response to this attempt to buckle up the Bible for the majority’s national identity project.</p> Gitte Buch-Hansen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 274 281 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152287 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152288 <p class="p1"><span class="s1"><em>Abstract: </em></span>Morten Hørning Jensen’s higher doctoral dissertation (habilitation) <span class="s1"><em>The ‘Gospel’ Between Emperor and Temple in the Gospel of Mark</em></span> is a meticulous investigation of the Greek root <span class="s2">εὐαγγελ</span>- and the Hebrew equivalent <span class="s2">בשׂר</span> in Greek and Hebrew literature before the Gospel of Mark and Mark’s use of the term in his text. Hørning Jensen concludes that the story of Jesus is the gospel to Mark “since Jesus, through his life, death, and resurrection, re-establishes covenantal community with and proximity to the God through kingly victory and temple-cultic renewal” (462). This way of understanding <span class="s2">εὐαγγέλιον</span> places it in direct continuity with Deutero-Isaiah, who uses the word to designate the return of Yahweh to Zion.The review article summarizes the argument at length, then poses some critical questions and finally offers a more substantial criticism of the fact that Paul is left out of the interpretation and only figures as a “test case” for the meaning of <span class="s2">εὐαγγέλιον</span> in Second Temple Judaism. If the relation to Paul is taken into account, the Gospel of Mark should be conceived of as a narrative unfolding of Paul’s gospel and not as the story of Jesus on the basis of the visions of Isaiah. One wonders why the author does not see a relation between Paul and Mark. The reason may be that he has sympathy for Papias’ idea that Mark was interpreter of Peter, which might make it virtually impossible for him to be influenced by Paul.</p> Jesper Tang Nielsen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 282 302 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152288 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152295 Hans Vium Mikkelsen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 303 304 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152295 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152296 Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 305 306 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152296 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152297 Anders Jarlert Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 307 308 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152297 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152299 Frederik Poulsen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 309 311 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152299 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152300 Jorunn Økland Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 312 313 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152300 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152301 Ellen Aasland Reinertsen Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 314 316 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152301 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152302 Elisa Uusimäki Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 317 318 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152302 https://tidsskrift.dk/dtt/article/view/152303 Rasmus H.C. Dreyer Copyright (c) 2024 Dansk Teologisk Tidsskrift 2024-12-17 2024-12-17 87 4 319 321 10.7146/dtt.v87i4.152303