Teachers’ task-specific questions when monitoring students’ combinatorial reasoning in mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v30i3.159685Keywords:
mathematicsAbstract
The aim of this paper is to contribute to what kinds of task-specific questions teachers pose when students solve problems and reason mathematically in combinatorics. With departure in creative mathematical reasoning (CMR), which entails constructing and arguing for solutions on mathematical problems, two lessons with similar mathematical problems on combinatorics in grades 5 and 6 from two teachers participating in the same professional development program were analyzed and contrasted. The analysis was supported by the four principles for CMR-teaching: encouraging students to initiate, develop, justify, and verify their own reasoning. The results show that despite that both teachers have very high mathematical knowledge for teaching, they pose different kinds of task-specific questions – adhering to the four principles – in relation to combinatorial reasoning. The first teacher poses questions according to the first two principles of initiating and developing students’ reasoning as well as funnels students towards answers and solutions, the latter which does not align with CMR-teaching. The second teacher poses questions according to all four principles for CMR-teaching. It is discussed how the differences in results between the two teachers’ lessons regarding the four principles underline the importance of preparing task-specific questions. It is also discussed how the results may contribute to teacher education activities aimed at developing teacher’s question-posing skills.
References
Ayalon, M. & Rubel, M. H. (2022). Selecting and sequencing for a whole-class discussion: Teachers’ considerations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 66, 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2022.100958
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H. & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
Batanero, C., Navarro-Pelayo, V. & Godino, J. D. (1997). Effect on the implicit combinatorial model on combinatorial reasoning in secondary school pupils. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32 (2), 181–199.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002954428327
Boaler, J. & Brodie, K. (2004). The importance, nature and impact of teacher questions. In Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 774–782).
Boesen, J., Helenius, O. & Johansson, B. (2015). National-scale professional development in Sweden: Theory, policy, practice. ZDM, 47 (1), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0653-4
Burkhardt, H. & Schoenfeld, A. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics. In H. L. Andrade et al. (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 35–67). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166933-3
DeJarnette, A. F., Wilke, E. & Hord, C. (2020). Categorizing mathematics teachers’ questioning: The demands and contributions of teachers’ questions. International Journal of Educational Research, 104, 101690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101690
Drageset, O. G. (2015). Student and teacher interventions: a framework for analysing mathematical discourse in the classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18, 253–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9280-9
English, L. D. (1991). Young children’s combinatoric strategies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22 (5), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00367908
English, L. D. (2005). Combinatorics and the development of children’s combinatorial reasoning. In G. A. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 121–141). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24530-8_6
Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E. & Battey, D. (2007). Mathematics teaching and classroom practice. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 225–256). Information Age Publishing.
Franke, M. L., Webb, N. M., Chan, A. G., Ing, M., Freund, G. & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students’ mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 60 (4), 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109339
Fransisco, J. M. (2013). Learning in collaborative settings: Students building on each other’s ideas to promote their mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82 (3), 417–438.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9437-3
Goos, M. & Kaya, S. (2020). Understanding and promoting students’ mathematical thinking: A review of research published in ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(1), 7–25.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09921-7
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E. & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111 (9), 2055–2100.
https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
Hiebert, J. & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematic teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.
Jonsson, B., Norqvist, M., Liljekvist, Y. & Lithner, J. (2014). Learning mathematics through algorithmic and creative reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 36, 20–32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2014.08.003
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academic Press.
Lampert, M., Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Chan Torrou, A., Beasley, H., Cunard, A., Crowe, K. (2013). Keeping it complex: Using rehearsals to support novice teacher learning of ambitious teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64 (3), 226–243.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112473837
Larsson (2015). Orchestrating mathematical whole-class discussions in the problem-solving classroom: Theorizing challenges and support for teachers. [Doctoral dissertation, Mälardalen University] Mälardalen University Press.
Larsson, M., Fredriksdotter, H. & Klang, N. (2024a). Different types of talk in mixed-attainment problem-solving groups: Contributions to individual students’ combinatorial thinking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 76, 101206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101206
Larsson, M., Kaufmann, O. T. & Ryve, A. (2024b). Investigating the relation between mathematics teachers’ beliefs, knowledge and error-handling practices - an exploratory study of 12 teachers in Grades 4-6. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2024.2438373
Lester, J. & Cai, F. K. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In P. Felmer et al. (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems: Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 117–135). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8
Lithner, J. (2008). A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67 (3), 255–276.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance creative and imitative reasoning. ZDM, 49 (6), 937–949.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9104-2
Lockwood, E. (2013). A model of students’ combinatorial thinking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32 (2), 251–265.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.02.008
Mueller, M., Yankelewitz, D. & Maher, C. (2014). Teachers promoting student mathematical reasoning. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7 (2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790339
Niss, M. & Jensen, T. H. (Eds.). (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklaering [Competencies and the learning of mathematics]. Undervisningsministeriets forlag.
Norqvist, M. (2018). The effect of explanations on mathematical reasoning tasks. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49 (1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1340679
Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T. & Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55, 100701.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.03.008
Olsson, J. & D’Arcy, D. (2022). Students’ reasoning and feedback from a teacher. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 27 (1), 27–49.
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v27i1.149182
Olsson, J. & Granberg, C. (2024). Teacher-student interaction supporting students’ creative mathematical reasoning during problem solving using Scratch. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 26 (3), 278–305.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065/2022/2105567
Olsson, J., Larsson, M., Granberg, C., Persberg, A-S., Salomonsson, L. & D’Arcy, D. (2024). Designing teaching for creative mathematical reasoning combined with retrieval practice. In J. Häggström, C. Kilhamn, L. Mattsson, H. Palmér, M. Perez, K. Pettersson, A-S. Röj-Lindberg & A. Teledahl (Eds.), Mediating mathematics: Proceedings of MADIF14 (pp. 25-35). Svensk förening för MatematikDidaktisk Forskning - SMDF.
Ratnayake, I. G., Ahl, L. M., Prytz, J. & Jankvist, U. T. (2024). Changing mathematics education practice: A systematic review of mathematics education implementation research in the Nordic countries. Implementation and Replication Studies in Mathematics Education, 4 (2), 215–242.
https://doi.org/10.1163/26670127-bja10021
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020). Mathematical practices, in theory and practice. ZDM, 52, 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01162-w
Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S. & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10 (4), 313-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802229675
Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W. & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455–488.
https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
Teledahl, A. & Olsson, J. (2019). Feedback for creative reasoning. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 3794–3801). Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME.
Wood, T. (1998). Funneling or focusing? Alternative patterns of communication in mathematics class. In H. Steinbring et al. (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 167–178). NCTM.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
