Second graders’ problem solving in a playful inquiry-based mathematics activity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v30i3.157446Keywords:
Elementary mathematics, inquiry, playful learning, problem solvingAbstract
This study investigates second graders’ problem-solving process within a playful inquiry-based context by drawing on previous research on problem solving and a sociocultural theory specific for mathematics education, the theory of objectification. Inspired by design research, a playful inquiry-based mathematics activity was co-designed with two teachers and applied in small groups. With a focus on dialogue and actions, qualitative data was complemented with a quantification of the children’s use of strategies. The study shows how the second graders were provided with opportunities to practice their problem-solving abilities through a process characterised by the development of and advancement in the students’ use of strategies differentiated into four levels.
References
References
Artigue, M., & Blomhøj, M. (2013). Conceptualizing inquiry-based education in mathematics. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 45(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0506-6
Björklund, C., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Kullberg, A. (2020). Research on early childhood mathematics teaching and learning. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 52(4), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01177-3
Blinkoff, E., Nesbitt, K. T., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2023). Investigating the contributions of active, playful learning to student interest and educational outcomes. Acta Psychologica, 238, 103983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103983
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic Analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cai, J. (2010). Helping elementary school students become successful mathematical problem solvers. In D. Lambdin (Ed.), Teaching and learning mathematics: Translating research to the classroom (pp. 9–14). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Cai, J. (2022). What research says about teaching mathematics through problem posing. Éducation et didactique, 16(3), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.10642
Cai, J., & Leikin, R. (2020). Affect in mathematical problem posing: conceptualization, advances, and future directions for research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10008-x
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032001009
Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. D.C. Heath & Co Publishers.
English, L. (2003). Engaging students in problem posing in an inquiry-oriented mathematics classroom. In F. K. Lester Jr & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching Mathematics through Problem Solving: Prekindergarten-grade 6 (pp. 187–196). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
English, L., & Sriraman, B. (2010). Problem solving for the 21st century. In B. Sriraman & L. English (Eds.), Theories of mathematics education: Seeking new frontiers (pp. 263–290). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00742-2_27
Flaten, L. (2025). Seven-year-old children’s learning opportunities when solving problems in a playful inquiry-based mathematics activity. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2025.2484240
Fleer, M. (2011). ‘Conceptual Play’: Foregrounding Imagination and Cognition during Concept Formation in Early Years Education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(3), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.3.224
Freudenthal, H. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426224
Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (2003). Developing understanding through problem solving. In H. L. Schoen & R. I. Charles (Eds.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grades 6-12 (pp. 3–13). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., Berk, L., & Singer, D. (2008). A mandate for playful learning in preschool: Presenting the evidence. Oxford University Press.
Hopkins, E. J., Toub, T. S., Hassinger-Das, B., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2019). Playing for the future: Redefining early childhood education. In D. Whitebread, V. Grau, K. Kumpulainen, M. M. McClelland, N. E. Perry, & D. Pino-Pasternak (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of developmental psychology and early childhood education (pp. 239–256). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526470393
Jaworski, B. (2005). Learning communities in mathematics: Creating an inquiry community between teachers and didacticians. Research in Mathematics Education, 7(1), 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794800008520148
Jay, J. A., & Knaus, M. (2018). Embedding play-based learning into junior primary (year 1 and 2) curriculum in WA. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n1.7
Lambdin, D. (2003). Benefits of teaching through problem solving. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Prekindergarten-grades 6 (pp. 3–13). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lannin, J. K., Ellis, A., Elliott, R., & Zbiek, R. M. (2011). Developing essential understanding of mathematical reasoning for teaching mathematics in grades pre-k-8. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lesh, R., & Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 763–804). Information Age Publishing.
Lester, F. K. (2013). Thoughts about research on mathematical problem-solving instruction. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1), 245–278. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1267
Lester, F. K., & Cai, J. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? Preliminary answers from 30 years of research. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and solving mathematical problems: Advances and new perspectives (pp. 117–135). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_8
Liljedahl, P. (2016). Building thinking classrooms: Conditions for problem-solving. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems: Advances and New Perspectives (pp. 361–386). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_21
Liljedahl, P., Santos-Trigo, M., Malaspina, U., & Bruder, R. (2016). Problem solving in mathematics education. In P. Liljedahl, M. Santos-Trigo, U. Malaspina, & R. Bruder (Eds.), Problem Solving in Mathematics Education (pp. 1–39). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2_1
Linell, P. (1998). Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspectives (Vol. 3). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.3
Ministry of Education and Research. (2020). Curriculum for Mathematics year 1-10 (MAT01-05). Retrieved from https://data.udir.no/kl06/v201906/laereplaner-lk20/MAT01-05.pdf?lang=eng
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & FIshbein, B. (2020). TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Boston College and
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://timss2019.org/reports/download-center/index.html
Nergård, B., & Wæge, K. (2021). Effective mathematical communication in play-based activities: A case study of a Norwegian preschool. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 47–66.
Niss, M., & Jensen, T. H. (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring—Ideer og inspiration til udvikling af matematikundervisning i Danmark [Competencies and mathematical learning—ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark].
Nordin, A.-K., & Boistrup, L. B. (2018). A framework for identifying mathematical arguments as supported claims created in day-to-day classroom interactions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.06.005
Palmér, H., & van Bommel, J. (2018). Problem solving in early mathematics teaching—a way to promote creativity? Creative Education, 9, 1775–1793. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2018.912129
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
Pyle, A., DeLuca, C., & Danniels, E. (2017). A scoping review of research on play-based pedagogies in kindergarten education. Review of Education, 5(3), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3097
Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students' types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327833MTL0501_02
Radford, L. (2009). Why do gestures matter? Sensuous cognition and the palpability of mathematical meanings. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9127-3
Radford, L. (2013). Three key concepts of the theory of objectification: Knowledge, knowing, and learning. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 2(1), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2013.19
Radford, L. (2021). The theory of objectification: A Vygotskian perspective on knowing and becoming in mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 4). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004459663
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 334–370). Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1-2), 9–34. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1258
Sumpter, L., & Hedefalk, M. (2015). Preschool children's collective mathematical reasoning during free outdoor play. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.03.006
van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Drijvers, P. (2020). Realistic Mathematics Education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (pp. 713–717). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_170
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Weisberg, D. S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2013). Guided play: Where curricular goals meet a playful pedagogy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12015
Weisberg, D. S., Kittredge, A. K., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Klahr, D. (2015). Making play work for education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721715583955
Wellington, J. (2015). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches (2nd ed. ed.). Bloomsbury.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895
Zosh, J. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Hopkins, E. J., Jensen, H., Liu, C., Neale, D., Solis, S. L., & Whitebread, D. (2018). Accessing the inaccessible: Redefining play as a spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01124
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Linn Flaten
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
