Metaphors and mathematical beliefs among Finnish pre-service teachers – A comparison of two teacher education pathways

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v31i2.156806

Keywords:

school mathematics, preservice teachers, metaphor analysis, mathematics beliefs, elementary school

Abstract

This study examines the mathematical beliefs of 97 Finnish pre-service primary school teachers in two teacher education pathways—a conventional program and a career-changer program. Using an essay-format survey and metaphor analysis, participants articulated beliefs about mathematics, previous teachers’ teaching methods, and beliefs about oneself as a mathematics learner. Journey metaphors were most common, while career-changers more strongly emphasized the perceived necessity of mathematics. Cross-tabulation revealed nuanced belief structures shaped by diverse experiential histories. The findings show how integrating metaphors with belief profiles offers deeper insight into emerging professional beliefs and supports more targeted, reflective practices in teacher education.

Author Biographies

Eunji Kim, Tampere University

Faculty of Education and Culture

Daranee Lehtonen, University of Turku

Turku Research Institute for Learning Analytics, Faculty of Science

Päivi Perkkilä, University of Turku

Department of Teacher Education

Jorma Joutsenlahti, Tampere University

Faculty of Education and Culture

References

Arslan, O., & Haser, Ç. (2025). Teacher identities and teacher identity change in pre-service mathematics teachers’ metaphors. Research in Mathematics Education, 27(3), 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2024.2306928

Asikainen, M. A., Viholainen, A., Koponen, M., & Hirvonen, P. E. (2017). Finnish entry-level students’ views of teacher knowledge and the characteristics of a good mathematics teacher. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 22(4), 61–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v22i4.148919

Baeten, M., & Meeus, W. (2016). Training second-career teachers: A different student profile, a different training approach? Educational Process: International Journal, 5(3), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.12973/edupij.2016.53.1

Beswick, K. (2012). Teachers’ beliefs about school mathematics and mathematicians’ mathematics and their relationship to practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9333-2

Cooshna-Naik, D. (2022). Exploring the use of tweets and word clouds as strategies in educational research. Journal of Learning for Development, 9(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v9i1.541

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Erens, R., & Eichler, A. (2019). Belief changes in the transition from university studies to school practice. In M. S. Hannula, G. C. Leder, F. Morselli, M. Vollstedt, & Q. Zhang (Eds.), Affect and mathematics education (pp. 345–373). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13761-8_16

Ernest, P. (2010). Mathematics and metaphor. Complicity: An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 7(1), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.29173/cmplct8844

Falani, I., Supriyati, Y., Marzal, J., Iriani, D., & Simatupang, G. M. (2023). Metaphor studies investigation in mathematics education: A systematic review. Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 6(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.31002/ijome.v6i1.554

Finnish National Agency for Education. (2016). National core curriculum for basic education 2014 (Publication 2016:5). Finnish National Agency for Education.

Finnish National Agency for Education [EDUFI]. (2021). Teachers and principals in Finland 2019 [Brochure]. Finnish National Agency for Education. https://www.oph.fi/en/statistics-and-publications/publications/teachers-and-principals-finland-2019

Finnish National Board on Research Integrity. (2019). The ethical principles of research with human participants and ethical review in the human sciences in Finland. https://tenk.fi/en/advice-and-materials/guidelines-ethical-review-human-sciences

Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), APA educational psychology handbook: Vol. 2. Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 471–499). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13274-019

Gomez, C. N. (2021). The use of metaphor to explore prospective mathematics teachers’ projective identity. School Science and Mathematics, 121(3), 143–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12458

Hannula, M. S. (2007). Finnish research on affect in mathematics: Blended theories, mixed methods and some findings. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(3), 197–203. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0022-7

Hannula, M. S. (2020). Affect in mathematics education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (2nd ed.), (pp. 32–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_174

Hannula, M. S., Kaasila, R., Laine, A., & Pehkonen, E. (2005). Structure and typical profiles of elementary teacher students’ view of mathematics. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 29) (Vol. 3, pp. 89–96). PME.

Hodgen, J., & Askew, M. (2007). Emotion, identity and teacher learning: Becoming a primary mathematics teacher. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701451090

Ingram, N., Linsell, C., & Offen, B. (2018). Growing mathematics teachers: Pre-service primary teachers’ relationships with mathematics. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 20(3), 41–60. https://doi.org/https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1195996

Joutsenlahti, J. (2005). Lukiolaisen tehtäväorientoituneen matemaattisen ajattelun piirteitä—1990-luvun pitkän matematiikan opiskelijoiden matemaattisen osaamisen ja uskomusten ilmentämänä [Doctoral dissertation, Tampere University]. Trepo. https://trepo.tuni.fi/handle/10024/67453

Kang, J., & Keinonen, T. (2016). Examining factors affecting implementation of inquiry-based learning in Finland and South Korea. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 74(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/16.74.34

Kim, E., Mallat, E., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2023). A systematic review of primary school class teachers views of mathematics teaching and learning. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 11(2), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.11.2.2055

Kim, E., Perkkilä, P., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2025). Teachers’ beliefs and instructional quality of Languaging in primary school mathematics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.13.1.2752

Krzywacki, H., & Portaankorva-Koivisto, P. (2018). Suomalainen matematiikan opettaja. In J. Joutsenlahti, H. Silfverberg, & P. Räsänen (Eds.), Matematiikan opetus ja oppiminen (pp. 278–293). Niilo Mäki Institute.

Latterell, C. M., & Wilson, J. L. (2016). Math is like a lion hunting a sleeping gazelle: Preservice elementary teachers’ metaphors of mathematics. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3), 283–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/9470

Lutovac, S. (2020). How failure shapes teacher identities: Pre-service elementary school and mathematics teachers’ narrated possible selves. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103120

Lutovac, S., & Kaasila, R. (2022). Towards conceptualising failure in mathematics as an autobiographical experience. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(5), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1892070

Lutovac, S., Uitto, M., Keränen, V., Kettunen, A., & Flores, M. A. (2024). Teachers’ work today: Exploring Finnish teachers’ narratives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 137, 104378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104378

Machalow, R., Goldsmith-Markey, L. T., & Remillard, J. T. (2022). Critical moments: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ narrative arcs and mathematical orientations over 20 years. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(1), 35–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09479-9

Mahlios, M., Massengill?Shaw, D., & Barry, A. (2010). Making sense of teaching through metaphors: A review across three studies. Teachers and Teaching, 16(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903475645

Malmivuori, M.-L. (2006). Affect and self-regulation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9022-8

Markovits, Z., & Forgasz, H. (2017). “Mathematics is like a lion”: Elementary students’ beliefs about mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9759-2

McGlone, M. S. (2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor? Language & Communication, 27(2), 109–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.016

Metsäpelto, R.-L., Poikkeus, A.-M., Heikkilä, M., Husu, J., Laine, A., Lappalainen, K., Lähteenmäki, M., Mikkilä-Erdmann, M., Warinowski, A., Iiskala, T., Hangelin, S., Harmoinen, S., Holmström, A., Kyrö-Ämmälä, O., Lehesvuori, S., Mankki, V., & Suvilehto, P. (2022). A multidimensional adapted process model of teaching. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 34(2), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-021-09373-9

Metsäpelto, R.-L., Warinowski, A., Poikkeus, A.-M., & Mikkilä-Erdmann, M. (2024). Fostering coherence in Finnish teacher education: The MAP model. In G. Doetjes, V. Domovic, M. Mikkilä-Erdmann, & K. Zaki (Eds.), Coherence in European teacher education: Theoretical models, empirical studies, instructional approaches (pp. 189–210). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43721-3_11

Niemi, L. H. L., Holm, M., Haataja, E., Ilomanni, P., & Laine, A. (2025). The role of teachers’ beliefs and professional development in students’ mathematics motivation in primary education. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.31129/lumat.13.1.2500

Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307

Panero, M., Castelli, L., Di Martino, P., & Sbaragli, S. (2023). Preservice primary school teachers’ attitudes towards mathematics: A longitudinal study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 55(2), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01455-2

Pehkonen, E. (1993). What are Finnish teacher educators’ conceptions about the teaching of problem solving in mathematics? European Journal of Teacher Education, 16(3), 237–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0261976930160306

Portaankorva-Koivisto, P. (2013). Prospective mathematics teachers’ metaphors for mathematics, teaching, and the teacher’s role. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 17(3–4), 159–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v17i3-4.148488

Reeder, S., Utley, J., & Cassel, D. (2009). Using metaphors as a tool for examining preservice elementary teachers’ beliefs about mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 109(5), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2009.tb18093.x

Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2005). ‘I’ve decided to become a teacher’: Influences on career change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(5), 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.007

Rönkkö, M.-L., Asanti, R., Aerila, J.-A., Hoikkala, M., & Lehti, P. (2014). Luokanopettajaopiskelijoiden käsityksiä opettajuudesta metaforatutkimuksen valossa. In M. Kauppinen, M. Rautiainen, & M. Tarnanen (Eds.), Ainedidaktisia tutkimuksia 9: Elävä ainepedagogiikka (pp. 26–43). Suomen Ainedidaktisen Tutkimusseuran julkaisuja.

Rösken, B., Hannula, M. S., Pehkonen, E., Kaasila, R., & Laine, A. (2007). Identifying dimensions of students’ view of mathematics. In D. Pitta-Pantazi & G. Philippou (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 349–358). ERME.

Salonen, R. V. (2024). Arviointien kertomaa: Lasten ja nuorten matemaattinen osaaminen, uskomukset ja tunteet [Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki]. Helda. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-84-0431-6

Skott, J. (2018). Re-centring the individual in participatory accounts of professional identity. In G. Kaiser, H. Forgasz, M. Graven, A. Kuzniak, E. Simmt, & B. Xu (Eds.), Invited Lectures from the 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education (pp. 601–618). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72170-5_33

Xenofontos, C., & Andrews, P. (2023). The experiential construction of mathematics teacher identity and the impact of early mathematical failure. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1158973. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1158973

Downloads

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

Kim, E., Lehtonen, D., Perkkilä, P., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2026). Metaphors and mathematical beliefs among Finnish pre-service teachers – A comparison of two teacher education pathways. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v31i2.156806

Issue

Section

Articles