Methodological issues and challenges in research on mathematics textbooks

Authors

  • Sebastian Rezat
  • Rudolf Sträßer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v20i3-4.148710

Abstract

The growing field of research on mathematics textbooks can be divided into three areas: 1) Research that focuses on the influences on textbooks; 2) Research that focuses on the mathematics textbook itself; 3) Research on the use of mathematics textbooks and its impact. Concentrating on research done in the Nordic countries, the paper provides an overview of methods used in all three areas. Based on an analysis of 24 papers, the findings are that whereas research related to area 1) and 2) usually relies on surveys or content analysis of textbooks – well-established methods from the social sciences –, research in area 3) has to face the methodological challenges of gathering valid data and of generalization of its results. Triangulation and typologies are presented as possible ways to tackle these challenges.

References

Askew, M., Hodgen, J., Hossain, S. & Bretscher, N. (2010). Values and variables. Mathematics education in high-performing countries. London: Nuffield foundation. Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/ files/Values_and_Variables_Nuffield_Foundation_v__web_FINAL(1).pdf

Beach, D. & Player-Koro, C. (2012). Authoritative knowledge in initial teacher education: studying the role of subject textbooks through two ethnographic studies of mathematics teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching: International research and pedagogy, 38 (2), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2012.656439

Bjarnadottir, K. (2007). The numbers one and zero in Northern European textbooks. International Journal for the History of Mathematics Education, 2 (2), 3-20.

Brändström, A. (2005). Differentiated tasks in mathematics textbooks - an analysis of the levels of difficulty (Licentiate thesis). Luleå University of Technology.

Bromme, R. & Hömberg, E. (1981). Die andere Hälfte des Arbeitstages - Interviews mit Mathematiklehrern über alltägliche Unterrichtsvorbereitung. Bielefeld: Institut für Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld.

Bremler, N. (2003). Matteboken som redskap och aktör. En studie av hur derivata introduceras i svenska läroböker 1967-2002 (Unpublished licentiate thesis). Lärarhögskolan i Stockholm.

Duval, R. (2000). Basic issues for research in mathematics education. In T. Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th conference of the International group for the Psychology in Mathematics Education (Vol.1, pp. 55-69). Hiroshima: Nishiki Print.

Fan, L. (2013). Textbook research as scientific research: towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45 (5), 765-777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0530-6

Floden, R. E., Porter, A. C., Schmidt, W. H., Freeman, D. J. & Schwille, J. R. (1981). Responses to curriculum pressures: a policy-capturing study of teacher decisions about content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73 (2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.73.2.129

Freeman, D. J. & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do textbooks dictate the content of mathematics instruction in elementary schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26 (3), 403-421. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312026003403

Frejd, P. (2013). An analysis of mathematical modelling in Swedish textbooks in upper secondary school. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 18 (3), 59-95.

Glaser, B. G. & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling grounded theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung [on-line journal], 5 (2), art. 4.

Grevholm, B. (2011). Network for research on mathematics textbooks in the Nordic countries. Nordic studies in Mathematics Education, 16 (4), 91-102.

Gunnarsdóttir, G. H. & Pálsdóttir, G. (2010). The implementation of the intended curriculum in teaching materials. In B. Sriraman, C. Bergsten, S. Goodchild, G. Palsdottir, B. D. Søndergaard & L. Haapasalo (Eds.), The first sourcebook on nordic research in mathematics education (pp. 539-549). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

Howson, G. (1995). Mathematics textbooks: a comparative study of grade 8 texts. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.

Howson, G. (2013). The development of mathematics textbooks: historical reflections from a personal perspective. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45, 647-658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0511-9

Jakobsson-Åhl, T. (2006). Algebra in upper secondary mathematics (Licentiate thesis). Dept. of Mathematics, Luleå University of Technology.

Jakobsson-Åhl, T. (2008). Word problems in upper secondary algebra in Sweden over the years 1960-2000. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 13 (1), 7-27.

Johansson, M. (2006). Textbooks as instruments. Three teachers' ways to organize their mathematics lessons. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 11 (3), 5-30.

Keranto, T. & Sarenius, V.-M. (2009). Number line as a teaching aid in the grades 1-2: textbook analysis and pupil interview. In M. Lepik (Ed.), Teaching mathematics: retrospective and perspectives. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (pp. 206-217). Tallinn University.

Kongelf, T. R. (2012). What characterises the heuristic approaches in mathematics textbooks used in lower secondary schools in Norway? Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 16 (4), 5-44.

Kluge, S. (2000). Empirically grounded construction of types and typologies in qualitative social research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung [on-line journal], 1 (1), art. 14.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Kudzma, R. (2005). Semiotics in education. Conceptions of mathematics. In C. Bergsten et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of NORMA 01, the 3rd Nordic conference on mathematics education (pp. 171-176). Linköping: SMDF.

Lamnek, S. & Krell, C. M. (2010). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim - Basel: Beltz.

Lennerstad, H. (2007). An evolutionary text book evolving by student activity. The Journal of Online Mathematics and Its Applications, 7(June).

Lepik, M. & T. Kaljas (2010). Eesti, Saksa, Soome ja Vene matemaatikaõpiku võrdlev analüüs [Estonian, Finnish, German and Russian mathematics textbooks in comparison]. Koolimatemaatika, 37, 35-45.

Lithner, J. (2003). Student's mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52 (1), 29-55. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023683716659

Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung [on-line journal], 1 (2).

Miller, J. R., Nutting, A. W. & Baker-Eveleth, L. (2012). The determinants of electronic textbook use among college students. American Economist (58) 1, 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/056943451305800105

Nuffield foundation. (2010). Are poor quality maths textbooks letting English pupils down? Retrieved from http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/news/are-poor-quality-maths-textbooks-letting-english-pupils-down

Österholm, M. (2006). Kognitiva och metakognitiva perspektiv pa läsförstaelse inom matematik (Ph. D. thesis). Linköping University.

Österholm, M. & Bergqvist, E. (2013). What is so special about mathematical texts? Analyses of common claims in research literature and of properties of textbooks. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45 (5), 751-763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0522-6

Philip, G. C. & Moon, S.-Y. (2013). An investigation of student expectation, perceived performance and satisfaction of e-textbooks. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 12, 287-298. https://doi.org/10.28945/1903

Randahl, M. & Grevholm, B. (2010). Learning opportunities offered by a classical calculus textbook. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 15 (2), 5-27.

Randahl, M. (2012). Approach to mathematics in textbooks at tertiary level - exploring authors' views about their texts. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 43 (7), 881-896. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.662299

Randahl, M. (2012). First-year engineering students' use of their mathematics textbook - opportunities and constraints. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24 (3), 239-256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-012-0040-9

Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75 (2), 211-246. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002211

Rezat, S. (2009). Das Mathematikbuch als Instrument des Schülers. Eine Studie zur Schulbuchnutzung in den Sekundarstufen. Wiesbaden: Vieweg+Teubner. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8348-9628-5

Rezat, S. (2013). The textbook-in-use: students' utilization schemes of mathematics textbooks related to self-regulated practicing. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45 (5), 659-670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0529-z

Rezat, S. & Sträßer, R. (2012). From triangle to tetrahedron: artifacts as fundamental constituents of the didactical situation. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44 (5), 641-651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0448-4

Rezat, S. & Sträßer, R. (2013). Methodologies in Nordic research on mathematics textbooks. In B. Grevholm et al. (Eds.), Nordic research in didactics of mathematics: past, present and future (pp. 469-482). Oslo: Cappelen Damm AS akademisk.

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T. & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims. A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5786-5

Senk, S. L., Thompson, D. R. & Wernet, J. L. W. (2014). Curriculum and achievement in algebra 2: influences of textbooks and teachers on students' learning about functions. In Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 515-540). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7560-2_24

Sidenvall, J., Lithner, J. & Jäder, J. (2014). Students' reasoning in mathematics textbook task-solving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46 (4), 533-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.992986

Skolverket. (2003). Lusten at lära - med fokus pa matematik. Nationella kvalitetsgranskningar 2001-2002 (Rapport nr. 221). Stockholm: Skolverket.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.

Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31 (4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005

Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H. & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book - using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0844-0_8

Vassiltshenko, L. (2004). Matemaatika aine ja õpikud õpilaste hinnangutes [The subject and the textbooks of mathematics in pupils' opinion]. Koolimatemaatika, 31, 28-34.

Zimmermann, P. (1992). Mathematikbücher als Informationsquellen für Schülerinnen und Schüler. Bad Salzdetfurth: Franzbecker.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-19

How to Cite

Rezat, S., & Sträßer, R. (2015). Methodological issues and challenges in research on mathematics textbooks. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3-4), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v20i3-4.148710

Issue

Section

Articles