Developing numeracy in the workplace
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v12i1.148021Abstract
Internationally, adult literacy and numeracy are in general recognized as cultural techniques. However, the two competences and their development are contested among politicians and researchers. Numeracy is often subsumed under literacy and/ or described in isolation from the situational context. Adult numeracy at work is often described unproblematically as transfer from school to workplace. With reference to Bernstein’s theoretical framework, we claim that adult numeracy on the labour market is a horizontal discourse, in contrast to the vertical discourse of mathematics. This article draws on the findings from an Australian study into numeracy in the context of chemical spraying and handling, utilising a methodology based on activity theory. The main findings are that mathematically straightforward skills become transformed into workplace numeracy competence, when the complexities associated with successful task completion as well as the supportive role of mediating artefacts and the workplace community of practice are taken into account.
References
Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions: A sociocultural expedition beyond transfer in education. Review of research in education, 24, 101-139. https://doi.org/10.2307/1167268
Beach, K. (2000). Mathematics in transition between work and school. Adults Learning Mathematics Newsletter, 11, 1-4.
Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: theory, research, critique (Rev. ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Boreham, N. (2004). Orienting the work-based curriculum towards work process knowledge: a rationale and a German case study. Studies in Continuing Education, 26 (2), 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225227
Coben, D. (1997). Mathematics or common sense? Some reflections on research into adults' mathematics life histories. In G. E. FitzSimons (Ed.), Adults returning to study mathematics: papers from working group 18, 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education, ICME 8 (pp. 37-48). Adelaide: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
Coben, D. (2003). Adult numeracy: review of research and related literature. London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy. [Available at www.nrdc.org.uk]
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: toward an activity- theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14 (1), 133-156.
https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
Engeström, Y. & Middleton, D. (1996). Introduction: studying work as mindful practice. I Y. Engeström & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 1-14). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174077.001
Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 26 (2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245
FitzSimons, G.E. (2002). What counts as mathematics? Technologies of power in adult and vocational education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47683-5
FitzSimons, G. E. (2004). Adult numeracy and workplace learning. Retrieved February 7, 2006, from http://www.statvoks.no/emma/Unpublished%20lit%20review.pdf
FitzSimons, G. E. (2004, July). An overview of adult and lifelong mathematics education. Keynote presentation at topic study group 6, 10th International Congress on Mathematics Education, ICME-10, Copenhagen.
FitzSimons, G. E. & Mlcek, S. (2004). Doing, thinking, teaching, and learning numeracy on the job: an activity approach to research into chemical spraying and handling. In J. Searle, C. McKavanagh & D. Roebuck (Eds.), Doing thinking activity learning: proceedings of the 12th annual International Conference on Post-Compulsory Education and Training (Vol. 1, pp. 149-156). Brisbane: Australian Academic Press.
FitzSimons, G. E., Mlcek, S., Hull, O. & Wright, C. (2005). Learning numeracy on the job: a case study of chemical handling and spraying. Final Report. Adelaide: National Centre for Vocational Education Research. [Retrieved October 12, 2006, from http://www.ncver.edu.au/publications/1609.html]
Griffiths, T. & Guile, D. (2003). A connective model of learning: the implications for work process knowledge. European Educational Research Journal, 2 (1), 56-73. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.1.10
Hoyles, C., Wolf, A., Molyneux-Hodson, S. & Kent, P. (2002). Mathematical skills in the workplace. Final report to the Science, Technology and Mathematics Council. Institute of Education, University of London and Science, Technology and Mathematics Council, London. (Available at http://www.ioe.ac.uk/tlrp/technomaths/skills2002/)
Kanes, C. (2002). Delimiting numerical knowledge. International Journal of Educational Research, 37 (1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(02)00020-4
Keitel, C., Kotzmann, E. & Skovsmose, O. (1993). Beyond the tunnel vision: analysing the relationships between mathematics, society and technology. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: mathematics education and technology (pp. 243-279). Berlin: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78542-9_11
Lindenskov, L. & Wedege, T. (2001). Numeracy as an analytical tool in mathematics education and research (Publication no. 31). Centre for Research in Learning Mathematics, Roskilde University.
O'Donoghue, J. (2002). Mathematics or numeracy: does it really matter?. In J. Evans et al. (Eds.), Policies & practices for adults learning mathematics: opportunities and risks. Proceedings of the 9th conference of ALM ( pp.34-43). London: King's College.
OECD (1995). Literacy, economy and society. Results of the first international adults literacy survey. Washington: OECD Publications and Information Centre.
OECD (2002). PISA, Programme for international student sssessment. (Available at http://www.pisa.oecd.org)
Onstenk, J. (1999, August). Competence development and learning at work. Paper contributed to the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction (EARLI 1999) symposium 'Learning and working', Göteborg, Sweden.
Perrenoud, P. (1999). Gestion de l'imprévu, analyse de l'action et construction de compétences. Education permanente, 140 (3), 123-144.
UNESCO (2000). World education report 2000. The right to education, towards education for all throughout life. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Wake, G. & Williams, J. (2001). Using college mathematics in understanding workplace practice: summative report of research project funded by the Leverhulme trust. The University of Manchester.
Wedege, T. (2000). Technology, competences and mathematics. In D. Coben, G. E. FitzSimons & J. O'Donoghue (Eds.), Perspectives on adults learning mathematics: research and practice (pp. 192-209). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wedege, T. (2002). Numeracy as a basic qualification in semi-skilled jobs. For the Learning of Mathematics, 22 (3), 23-28.
Wedege, T. (2004). Mathematics at work: researching adults' mathematics- containing competences. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 9 (2), 101-122.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
