The didactic divide and the education of teachers of mathematics in Sweden

Authors

  • Christer Bergsten
  • Barbro Grevholm

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v9i2.147123

Abstract

On a background of tradition versus renewal, a discussion on recent teacher education reforms in Sweden is given. A balance of different aspects of content and a need for research are seen as critical for the formation of mathematics teacher education. A conception of a ’didactic divide’ between disciplinary and pedagogical knowledge is used as an analytic tool to describe the rationale behind the design of the reforms. Empirical data from student teachers enrolled in the new teacher education programme highlight how the structure and content of the programme contribute to overcoming the divide.

References

Ball, D. & Bass, H. (2000). Interweaving content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach: Knowing and using mathematics. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 83-104). London: Ablex. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400688362.0008

Bergsten, C. (2002). Faces of Swedish research in mathematics education. In C. Bergsten, G. Dahland & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Research and action in the mathematics classroom (pp. 21-36). Linköping: SMDF.

Bergsten, C., Botten, G., Fuglestad, A.-B., Grevholm, B., Holden, I. & Lingefjärd, T. (2003, May). The education and competence development of mathematics teachers in Norway and Sweden. A study material for the symposium. Paper prepared for the international research symposium on the education of mathematics teachers, Malmö University College.

Bjerneby Häll, M. (2002). Varför undervisning i matematik? (Licentiatavhandling. FiF-avhandling 60/02). Institutionen för beteendevetenskap, Linköpings universitet.

Björkqvist, O. (2003). Matematikdidaktiken i Sverige: En lägesbeskrivning av forskningen och utvecklingsarbetet. Stockholm: Kungliga Vetenskapsakademin.

Boero, P., Dapueto, C. & Parenti, L. (1996). Didactics of mathematics and the personal knowledge of teachers. In A. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, part 2 (pp. 1097-1121). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_33

Brown, C.A. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D.A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 209-239). New York: Macmillan.

Comiti, C. & Ball, D. (1996). Preparing teachers to teach mathematics: A comparative perspective. In A. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, part 2 (pp. 1123-1153). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_35

Ds U 1986:5 16 (Ministry publication series). Matematik i skolan. Översyn av undervisningen i matematik inom skolväsendet. Stockholm: Utbildnings- departementet.

Ds 1996:16 (Ministry publication series). Lärarutbildning i förändring [Teacher education in transition]. Stockholm:Utbildningsdepartementet.

Gran, B. (1995). Professionella lärare? Lärarförbundets utvärdering av grundskollärarutbildningen. Stockholm: Lärarförbundet.

Grevholm, B. (1999). Teacher students' development of concepts in mathematics and mathematics education. In G. Brekke & T. Breiteg (Eds.), Proceedings from NORMA98 (pp. 138-145). Kristiansand: Agder College.

Grevholm, B. (2000). Research on student teachers' development of concepts in mathematics and mathematics education. In J. Lithner & H. Wallin (Eds.), Problem driven research in mathematics education (Research reports in mathematics education, No 1, pp. 87-95). Umeå University.

Grevholm, B. (2002). Lärarutbildning (NCM-rapport 2002:1). Göteborg: NCM.

Hansson, Ö. & Grevholm, B. (2003). Preservice teachers' conceptions about y=x+5: Do they see a function? In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of 2003 joint meeting of PME and PME-NA, vol. 3 (pp. 25-39). University of Hawaii.

Holmquist, M. (2004, January). Prospective mathematics teachers' learning in geometry - The beginning of a longitudinal study on teacher education. Paper presented at MADIF4 conference, Malmö.

HSV (National Agency for Higher Education) (1996). Grundskollärarut- bildningen 1995 - en utvärdering [Compulsory school teacher education - an evaluation] (Högskoleverkets rapportserie 1996:1 R). Stockholm: Högskoleverket.

Jaworski, B. (2002). The Student - Teacher - Educator - Researcher in the mathematics classroom. Co-learning partnerships in mathematics teaching and teaching development. In C. Bergsten, G. Dahland & B. Grevholm (Eds.), Research and action in the mathematics classroom (pp. 37-54). Linköping: SMDF. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000006160.91028.f0

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. & Findell, B. (Eds.) (2001). Adding it up. Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Pess.

Krainer, K. (2003, May). Reform in mathematics teacher education as a cardinal point of educational systems in transition. Paper presented at the International research symposium on the education of mathematics teachers, Malmö University College.

Lindblad, T. (1978). Blivande klasslärares ingångskunskaper i matematik. Institutionen för praktisk pedagogik, Göteborgs universitet.

Lindblad, T. & Stukát, S. (Eds.) (1981). Kunskapssyn och ämnessyn i klasslärarutbildningen (Rapport nr 111). Institutionen för praktisk pedagogik, Göteborgs universitet.

Lingefjärd, T. H. (2000). Mathematics modelling by prospective teachers using technology (Doctoral thesis). Athens: University of Georgia.

Ljung, B.-O. (1987). Klasslärarkandidaters räkneförmåga. Stockholm: Högskolan för lärarutbildning.

Malmros, Å. (red.) (1986). På väg mot en ny grundskollärarutbildning. Stockholm: Högskolan för lärarutbildning.

Marton, F. (1993). Phenomenography. In T. Husén & T. N. Postelthwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopaedia of education (2nd ed., pp. 4424-4429). Oxford: Pergamon.

Mewborn, D. (2000, April). An analysis of the research on K-8 teachers' mathematical knowledge. Paper presented at AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans.

Mouwitz, L. (2001). Hur kan lärare lära? (NCM-rapport 2001:2). Göteborg: NCM.

NCTM (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics) (1991). Professional standards for teaching of mathematics. Reston, VA: The Council.

Niss, M. & Højgaard Jensen, T. (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring (Uddannelsesstyrelsens temahæfteserie nr. 18-2002). København: Under- visningsministeriet.

Proposition 1967:4 (Government bill). Kungl. Maj:ts proposition till riksdagen angående reformerad lärarutbildning. Stockholm: Riksdagen tryck.

Proposition 1984/85:122 (Government bill). Regeringens proposition om lärarutbildning för grundskolan m.m. Stockholm: Riksdagen tryck.

Proposition 1999/2000:135 (Government bill). En förnyad lärarutbildning. Stockholm: Riksdagen tryck.

Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175860

Sierpinska, A. (1996). Wither mathematics education? In C. Alsina et al. (Eds), Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Sevilla: S.A.E.M. 'Thales'.

Sierpinska, A. & Lerman, S. (1996). Epistemologies of mathematics and of mathematics education. In A. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, part 2 (pp. 827-876). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1465-0_26

Skolverket (Swedish National Agency for Education) (1997). Kommentar till grundskolans kursplan och betygskriterier i matematik. Stockholm: Liber Distribution.

Skolöverstyrelsen (Swedish National Board for Education) (1983). Matematik i svensk skola (FoU Rapport 46). Stockholm: Liber Utbildningsförlaget.

SOU1965:29 (Swedish government official reports). Lärarutbildningen, IV:1. Stockholm: Esselte AB.

SOU1978:86 (Swedish government official reports). Lärare för skola i utveckling: betänkande. Stockholm: Liber förlag/Allmänna förlaget.

SOU1999:63 (Swedish government official reports). Att lära och att leda. En lärarutbildning för samverkan och utveckling. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet.

Tzur, R. (2001). Becoming a mathematics teacher-educator: Conceptualizing the terrain through self-reflective analysis. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4 (4), 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013314009952

Vom Hofe, R. (1998). On the generation of basic ideas and individual images: Normative, descriptive and constructive aspects. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: a search for identity. An ICMI study, book 2 (pp. 317-331). Dordrecht: Kluwer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5470-3_20

Wheeler, D. (1986). The teaching of primary and secondary school mathematics. In D. Layton (Ed.), Innovations in science and technology education. Paris: UNESCO.

Wyndhamn, J., Riesbeck, E. & Schoultz, J. (2000). Problemlösning som metafor och praktik. Institutionen för tillämpad lärarkunskap, Linköpings universitet.

Zaslavsky, O. & Leikin, R. (1999). Interweaving the training of mathematics teacher-educators and the professional development of mathematics teachers. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd conference of the international group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol. 1 (pp. 143-158). Haifa: Israel Institute of Technology.

Downloads

Published

2004-07-01

How to Cite

Bergsten, C., & Grevholm, B. (2004). The didactic divide and the education of teachers of mathematics in Sweden. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 9(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v9i2.147123

Issue

Section

Articles