Recent developments in Finnish mathematics education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v9i2.147117Abstract
The article addresses some development trends that have taken place in mathematics education of the Finnish comprehensive school over the past 15 years. A particular reason for such analysis arises from the international large-scale assessments on science and mathematics conducted at the turn of the millennium, which showed that Finnish student performance in mathematics is of a high international standard. Good achievement is attributable to a whole network of interrelated factors. The comprehensive school system seems to be successful in providing the majority of its students with a solid foundation for further schooling and for transition to working life. Long-term curricular measures and extensive development schemes have served as important framing factors. Also the high standard of teacher preparation and mathematics teachers’ professional skills is a factor that probably contributes to student performance. At the level of students, self-confidence in learning mathematics seems to be closely related to the level of performance. As regards remedies to shortcomings and problems, recognition of national strengths creates a positive atmosphere for improvement.
References
Allen, A., Black, P., & Wallin, H. (2002). An evaluation report on the LUMA programme prepared for the Ministry of Education (Committee report 42). Helsinki: Ministry of Education.
Aroluoma, I. (2001). "Tunnilla ei tympäse": LUMA-talkoot opetuskäytänteiden muuttajana 1996-1999. ["You aren't bored stiff during the lessons": LUMA collaboration and changes in teaching practices in 1996-1999]. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.
Clarke, D. (2003). International comparative research in mathematics education. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education. Part one (pp. 143-184). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
IEA (2001). TIMSS 1999 international database. Almanacs. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Hiebert, J. (Ed.) (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: A case of mathematics. London: Erlbaum.
Komiteanmietintö (1989). Matemaattis-luonnontieteellisen perus-sivistyksen komitean loppumietintö. Komiteanmietintö 1989:45. [The final report of the Committee on Mathematics and Science Education]. Helsinki: Valtion painatuskeskus.
Kupari, P. (1994). Applied problem solving in Finnish school mathematics education in the 1980s. Results and experiences in the international context (Publication series A. Research reports 58). University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research.
Kupari, P., Reinikainen, P., Nevanpää, T., & Törnroos, J. (2001). Miten matematiikkaa ja luonnontieteitä osataan suomalaisessa peruskoulussa. Kolmas kansainvälinen matematiikka- ja luonnontiedetutkimus TIMSS 1999 Suomessa. [How do Finnish comprehensive school students perform in mathematics and science? The Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS 1999) in Finland]. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.
Kupari, P. & Törnroos, J. (2003). Matematiikan osaaminen peruskoulussa kansainvälisten arviointitutkimusten valossa. [Mathematics performance in the comprehensive school on the basis of the international assessment studies]. Teoksessa P. Räsänen, P. Kupari, T. Ahonen & P. Malinen (toim.) Matematiikka - näkökulmia opettamiseen ja oppimiseen. Jyväskylä: Niilo Mäki Instituutti ja Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.
Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzales, E.J. et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International mathematics report. Findings from IEA's repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the eight grade. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
National Board of Education (1994). Framework curriculum for the comprehensive school. Helsinki: Author.
OECD (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills. The PISA 2000 assessment of reading, mathematical and scientific literacy. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264181564-en
OECD (2001). Knowledge and skills for life. First results from the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2000. Paris: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264195905-en
Opetusministeriö (1996). Suomalaisten matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden osaaminen vuonna 2002. Kansalliset kehittämistalkoot. [Finnish know-how in mathematics and natural sciences in 2002] (Koulutus- ja tiedepolitiikan julkaisusarja Nro 38). Helsinki: Opetusministeriö.
Opetusministeriö (1999). Suomalaisten matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden osaaminen vuonna 2002. Kansalliset kehittämistalkoot -ohjelman tarkistaminen 1999. [Finnish knowledge in mathematics and sciences in 2002. Revision of the national joint action programme (LUMA)] (Koulutus- ja tiedepolitiikan julkaisusarja Nro 72). Helsinki: Opetusministeriö.
Opetusministeriö (2002). Suomalaisten matematiikan ja luonnontieteiden osaaminen vuonna 2002. Kansallisten kehittämistalkoiden loppuraportti. [Finnish knowledge in mathematics and sciences in 2002. Final report of LUMA programme] (Koulutus- ja tiedepolitiikan julkaisusarja Nro 102). Helsinki: Opetusministeriö.
Porter, A. C., & Gamoran, A. (Eds.) (2002). Methodological advances in cross- national surveys of educational achievement. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Silfverberg, H. (1999). Peruskoulun yläasteen oppilaan geometrinen käsitetieto. [Conceptual geometric knowledge of pupils in the upper level of the comprehensive school] (Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 710). Tampereen yliopisto.
Välijärvi, J., & Linnakylä, P. (Eds.) (2002). Tulevaisuuden osaajat. PISA 2000 Suomessa. [Knowledge and skills for the future. PISA 2000 in Finland]. Jyväskylän yliopisto, Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos.
Välijärvi, J., Linnakylä, P., Kupari, P., Reinikainen, P., & Arffman, I. (2002). The Finnish success in PISA - and some reasons behind it. University of Jyväskylä, Institute for Educational Research.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
