Leveraging constructivism to apply to systemic reform

Authors

  • Jere Confrey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v8i3.146709

Abstract

The question posed for this conference was "what are our current understandings of the theoretical foundations of mathematics education?" To address this question, I first asked myself, "Why it is important to answer such a question?" Is it primarily an issue of philosophical investigation? Or, is it, rather, a call for some clarification about the proliferation of theories in mathematics education and their interrelationships, reexamining each theory in light of multiple theories. This second query interests me, because increasingly as I extend the scope of my research to see constructivism enacted in classrooms and schools, I need broader theoretical constructs. And, I need to reexamine of my own assumptions and their warrant.

References

Abate, F. (1999). The Oxford English Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press.

Ascher, M. (1991). Ethnomathematics: A Multicultural View of Mathematical Ideas. Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove CA.

Cobb, P. & Steffe, L. (1983). The Constructivist Researcher as Teacher and Model Builder. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(2), 83-94. https://doi.org/10.2307/748576

Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & Wood, T. (1991). A Constructivist Approach to Second Grade Mathematics. In E. von Glaserfeld (Ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, (pp. 157-176). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47201-5_8

Confrey, J., Castro-Filho, J. & Wilhelm, J. (2000). Implementation Research as a Means to Link Systemic Reform and Applied Psychology in Mathematics Education. Educational; Psychologist, 35(3), 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3503_4

Confrey, J. (1991). Learning to Listen: A Student's Understanding of Powers of Ten. In E. von Glasserfeld (Ed.), Radical Constructivism in Mathematics Education, (pp. 111-138). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47201-5_6

Glaserfeld, E. von (1995). Radical Constructivism: Ways of Knowing and Learning. Falmer Press, London.

Haarer, S. (1999). Student Reflections and Software Recording Tools. Unpublished dissertation, Cornell University, Ithica, NY.

Lakatos, I. (1998). What Does Mathematical Proof Mean. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New Directions In The Philosophy of Mathematics, (pp 153-163). Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

Larochelle, M., Bednarz, N. & Garrison, J. (1998). Constructivism and Education. Cambridge University Press, New York. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511752865

Piaget, J. (1959). The Language and Thought of the Child. The Humanities Press, New York.

Piaget, J. (1969). The Growth of Logic in the Child. W. W. Norton & Co. New York.

Piaget, J. (1972). The Principles of Genetic Epistemology. Routledge and Paul Kegan, London.

Piaget, J. (1977). Psychology and Epistemalogy. Penguin Books, New York.

Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Sabelli, N. & Dede, C. (2000). Reconceptualizing the Goals and Process of Educational Research Funding: Interconnecting Scholarship and Practice. National Science Foundation, Washington D.C.

Steffe, L. & Gale, J. (1995). Constructivism in Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates, Hillsdale, NJ.

Shapin, S. & Schaffer, S. (1985). Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbs, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Steffe, L., von Glasersfeld, E. & Cobbs, P. (1983). Childrens' Counting Types: Philosophy Theory, and Application. Praeger Publisher, New York.

Thurston, W. (1998). On Proof and Progress in Mathematics. In T. Tymoczko (Ed.), New Directions In The Philosophy of Mathematics, (pp 317-336). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

Tobin, K. (1993). The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. AAAS Press, Washington D.C.

Downloads

Published

2000-09-10

How to Cite

Confrey, J. (2000). Leveraging constructivism to apply to systemic reform. NOMAD Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 8(3), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v8i3.146709

Issue

Section

Articles