Recent research and a critique of theories of early geometry learning: the case of the angle concept

Kay Owens

doi:10.7146/nomad.v4i2-3.146429

Authors

Kay Owens

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nomad.v4i2-3.146429

Abstract

The van Hieles' theory on levels of development has been supported by many studies, particularly in geometry. An important consequence of the van Hiele work has been the realisation that informal experiences assist students to take the necessary first-step of recognising, for example, shapes. Despite this important influence, some authors have cautioned that visual reasoning can be independent of the levels because there are some difficulties in trying to allot students to levels.

In order to illustrate developments in our understanding of students' geometry learning and the role of visual processing, studies on the difficulties students have with angle concepts are discussed. Based on a large qualitative study, the ability to notice and analyse angles is explained in terms of aspects of problem solving or investigation. Case studies illustrate how the complex conceptualisations about angles were developing concurrently, rather than in fixed levels, as a result of visual (mental) imagery, selective attention, manipulation of materials, and discussion.

Responsiveness, a compound variable resulting from a complex of cognitive processing unique to the individual emerged as important. Responsiveness suggests an empathy or understanding of the problem resulting from cognitive processing, in particular selective attention. Responsiveness affects interactions with materials and with people who, in turn, influence thinking and the continuing cycle of problem solving and understanding of the angle concept

References

Ahlberg, A. (1992). Att möta matematiska problem: En belysning av barns lärande.[The meeting with mathematical problems: An illumination of children's learning]. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis 87:1992. Doctoral thesis. University of Gothenburg.

Battista, M. T., & Clements, D. H. (1991). Using spatial imagery in geometric reasoning. Arithmetic Teacher, 39 (3), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.39.3.0018

Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.

Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour. In H. Rowe (Ed.), Intelligence: Reconceptualisation and measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Burger, W. F., & Culpepper, B. (1993). Restructuring geometry. In P. Wilson (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom. High school mathematics (pp. 140-154). New York: Macmillan.

Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17, 31-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/749317

Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1991). Van Hiele levels of learning geometry. In F. Fulvinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of 15th PME Conference (Vol. 1, pp. 223-230). Italy: Program Committee for the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.

Clements, D. H., & Battista, M. T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (pp. 420-464). New York: Macmillan.

Close, G. (1982). Children's understanding of angle at the primary/secondary transfer stage. B.Sc. dissertation. Council for National Academic Awards. London: Department of Mathematical Sciences and Computing, Polytechnique of the South Bank.

Crowley, M. L. (1990). Criterion-referenced reliability indices associated with the van Hiele geometry test. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 238-241. https://doi.org/10.2307/749377

Davey, G., & Pegg, J. (1991). Angles on angles: Students' perceptions. Paper presented at 14th Annual Conference of Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Perth.

Denis, L. P. (1987). Relationships between stage of cognitive development and van Hiele level of geometric thought among Puerto Rican adolescents. Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 859A

Fuys, D., Geddes, D., & Tischler, R. (1988). The van Hiele model of thinking in geometry among adolescents. Journal for Research in Mathematics, Monograph 3. Reston, Va: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.2307/749957

Gutiérrez, A., Jaime, A., & Fortuny, J. M. (1991). An alternative paradigm to evaluate the acquisition of the van Hiele levels. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 237-251. https://doi.org/10.2307/749076

Heijden, A. H. C.van der (1992). Selective attention in vision. London: Routledge.

Hiele, P. van (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. New York: Academic Press.

Hershkowitz, R. (1989). Visualization in geometry-two sides of the coin. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 77(1), 61-76.

Hoffer, A. (1983). Van Hiele-based research. In R. A. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 205-228). New York: Academic Press.

Kaufmann, G. (1979). Visual imagery and its relation to problem solving. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.

Kouba, V. L., Brown, C. A., Carpenter, T. P., Lindquist, M. M., Silver, E. A., & Swafford, J. O. (1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: Measurement, geometry, data interpretation, attitudes, and other topics. Arithmetic Teacher, 35 (9), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.35.9.0010

Lawrie, C. (1993). Some problems identified with Mayberry test items in assessing students' van Hiele levels. In B. Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss, & G. Booker (Eds.), Contexts in mathematics education, (pp. 381-390). Brisbane: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Mansfield, H. M., & Happs, J. C. (1992). Estimation and mental-imagery models in geometry, Arithmetic Teacher 40 (1), 44- 46. https://doi.org/10.5951/AT.40.1.0044

Marton, F. & Booth, S. (in press). Learning and awareness. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Mason, J. (1992). Doing and construing mathematics in screen-space. In E. Southwell, B. Perry, & K. Owens (Eds.), Space - the first and final frontier (pp. 1-17). Sydney: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Mayberry, J. (1983). The van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate pre-service teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14, 58-69. https://doi.org/10.2307/748797

Mitchelmore, M. C. (1989). The development of children's concepts of angle. In G. Vergnaud (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th Annual PME Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 304- 311). Paris: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematical Education.

Mitchelmore, M. C, (1992a). Children's concepts of perpendiculars. In W. Geeslin & K. Graham (Eds.), Proceedings of 16th Annual Conference of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 120-127). Durham, NH: Organising committee for PME16.

Mitchelmore, M. C. (1992b). What's the right angle? Classroom, 12 (6), 14-16. Mitchelmore, M. C. (1993). Abstracting the angle concept. In B. Atweh, C. Kanes, M. Carss, & G. Booker (Eds.), Contexts of mathematics education (pp. 401-406). Brisbane: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Mitchelmore, M. C. (1994). Abstraction as the recognition of deep similarities: the case of the angle concept. In G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson, & J. Geake (Eds.), Challenges in mathematics education: Constraints on construction (pp. 429-436). Lismore: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Mitchelmore, M. C , & White P. (1995). Abstraction in mathematics: Conflict, resolution and application. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 7, 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217275

Osborne, R. J., & Wittrock, M. C. (1983). Learning science: a generative process. Science Education, 67, 489-508. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670406

Outhred, L. (1987). Left angle or right angel: children's misconceptions of angle. Research in Mathematics Education in Australia, 14, 41-47.

Owens, K.D. (1990, July). Getting inside the problem solver's head: Using retrospection and observation to access spatisal and problem thinking processes. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference of the Mathematical Education Research Group of Australasia, Hobart.

Owens, K. D. (1992a). Factors pertinent to children's responsiveness in spatial problem-solving activities. In E. Southwell, B. Perry, & K. Owens (Eds.), Space: The first and final frontier. Proceedings of 15th Annual Conference (pp. 421-431). Sydney: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia

Owens, K. D. (1992b). Spatial mathematics: a group test for primary school students. In M. Stephens & J. Izard (Eds.), Reshaping assessment practices: assessment in the mathematical sciences under challenge. Proceedings from the first National Conference on Assessment in the Mathematical Sciences (pp. 333-354). Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Owens, K. D. (1993). Spatial thinking employed by primary school students engaged in mathematical problem solving. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.

Owens, K. D. (1994). Encouraging visual imagery in concept construction: Overcoming constraints. In G. Bell, B. Wright, N. Leeson, & J. Geake (Eds.), Challenges in Mathe- matics Education: Constraints on construction, (pp. 455-462). Lismore: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

Owens, K. D. (in press). Classroom views of space. In J. Lokan & B. Doig (Eds.), Learning from children. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

Owens, K. D., & Clements, M. A. (in press). Representations used in spatial problem solving in the classroom, Journal of Mathematical Behavior.

Pegg, J., & Davey, G. (1989). Clarifying level descriptors for children's understanding of some basic 2-D geometric shapes. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 1 (1), 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217200

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1956). The child's conception of space. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Senk, S. L. (1989). Van Hiele levels and achievement in writing geometry proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20, 309-321. https://doi.org/10.2307/749519

Usiskin, Z. (1987). Resolving the continuing dilemmas in school geometry. In M. M. Lindquist & A. P. Schulte (Eds.), Learning and teaching geometry: K - 12: 1987 Yearbook (pp. 17-31). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Wilson, M. (1990). Measuring a van Hiele geometry sequence: A reanalysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 230-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/749376