Årg. 25 Nr. 43 (2025): Det Biosociale
Originalartikler

Mine øjne lyver ikke: Skilled vision og biosociale dynamikker i griseproduktion i Danmark

PDF
  • Eimear Mc Loughlin,
  • Jens Seeberg
Jens Seeberg
Aarhus Universitet
Forsiden med overskriften: Det Biosociale. Forestiller en rød og blå fugl med spredte vinger, malet i akvarel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v25i43.151690

Publiceret 2025-12-08

Citation/Eksport

Mc Loughlin, E., & Seeberg, J. (2025). Mine øjne lyver ikke: Skilled vision og biosociale dynamikker i griseproduktion i Danmark. Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund, 25(43), 11–30. https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v25i43.151690

Copyright (c) 2025 Eimear Mc Loughlin, Jens Seeberg

Creative Commons License

Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse –Ikke-kommerciel (by-nc).

Resumé

Industriel biosocialitet beskriver de kontekstualiserede biosociale relationer mellem flere arter, som er blevet forvandlet af den hurtige acceleration af livsprocesser i det Antropocæne. Med dette begreb undersøger vi, hvordan nye former for intimitet og stadig mere komplekse dimensioner af andetgørelse og fremmedgørelse breder sig i rum, der er domineret af senkapitalistiske krav til vækst og effektivitet i industriel svineproduktion. 

Denne artikel studerer, hvordan landarbejdere forvalter og passer industrigrise ved at tilpasse sig de daglige møder på en konventionel svinefarm. Ved at fokusere på landmændenes og arbejdernes multisensoriske repertoire beskriver vi, hvordan disse praksisser mobiliseres og forfines i en industriel logik. Artiklen udfordrer antagelsen om, at multisensorisk viden typisk modsætter sig logikker om kommodificering og objektivering. Vi viser i stedet, hvordan multisensoriske praksisser opererer for at opretholde og forstærke andetgørende og fremmedgørende logikker i griseproduktionen. 

PDF

Referencer

  1. Andersen, H. (2018). ASF er den tikkende bombe under svineproduktion. Effektivt Landbrug.https://effektivtlandbrug.landbrugnet.dk/artikler/svin/asp-er-den-tikkende-bombe-under-svineproduktion.aspx
  2. Baker, K. (2016). Home and heart, hand and eye: Unseen links between pigmen and pigs in industrial farming. In E.-J. Abbots & A. Lavis (Eds.), Why We Eat, How We Eat: Contemporary Encounters Between Foods and Bodies (pp. 53-73). Routledge.
  3. Bell, S. E., Hullinger, A., & Brislen, L. (2015). Manipulated Masculinities: Agribusiness, Deskilling, and the Rise of the Businessman‐Farmer in the U nited S tates. Rural Sociology, 80(3), 285-313.
  4. Besky, S., & Blanchette, A. (2019). How Nature Works: Rethinking Labor on a Troubled Planet. University of New Mexico Press.
  5. Birk, U. (2021). Dansk landbrug mangler nu både dansk og udenlandsk arbejdskraft. Landbrugs Avisen. 24/7/2021. https://landbrugsavisen.dk/dansk-landbrug-mangler-nu-b%C3%A5de-dansk-og-udenlandsk-arbejdskraft
  6. Blanchette, A. (2020). Porkopolis: American Animality, Standardized Life, and the Factory Farm. Duke University Press.
  7. Brantz, D. (2005). “Animal Bodies, Human Health, and the Reform of Slaughterhouses in Nineteenth-Century Berlin”. Food and History, 3(2), 193-215.
  8. Classen, C. (2010). Foundations for an anthropology of the senses. International Social Science Journal, 49(153), 401–412.
  9. Cook, J. A. (2023). Beyond the agricultural “suffering slot”: Structural agency in US farm work. Anthropology of Work Review, 44(2), 69-80.
  10. Cremer, J. (2016). Expats: Denmark ‘world’s worst’ for making friends. The Local DK. https://www.thelocal.dk/20160829/expats-name-denmark-worst-in-the-world-for-making-friends
  11. Druglitrø, T. (2018). “Skilled care” and the making of good science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(4), 649-670.
  12. DST. (2023). Færre svin og bedrifter med svin (118). 7/6/2022). DST. https://www.dst.dk/Site/Dst/Udgivelser/nyt/GetPdf.aspx?cid=46012
  13. Elias, N., Dunning, E., Goudsblom, J., & Mennell, S. (2000). The Civilizing Process: Sociogenetic and Psychogenetic Investigations (Rev. ed.). Blackwell Publishers.
  14. Escobar, M. P., & Demeritt, D. (2017). Paperwork and the decoupling of audit and animal welfare: The challenges of materiality for better regulation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(1), 169-190.
  15. Eurostat. (2022). Farms and farmland in the European Union– statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/SEPDF/cache/73319.pdf
  16. FRA. (2015). Severe Labour Exploitation: Workers Moving Within Or Into the European Union: States’ Obligations and Victims’ Rights (9292398849).
  17. Franju, G. (1949). Le sang des bêtes. Forces et voix de la France, Francia.
  18. Gillespie, K., & Narayanan, Y. (2021). Global Atmospheres of Violence: Shifting Terrains of Othering in Feminist Multispecies Witnessing. In C. J. Adams & L. Gruen (Eds.), Ecofeminism: Feminist Intersections with Other Animals and the Earth (Chapter 18, pp. 335-353). Bloomsbury Academic.
  19. Grasseni, C. (2004). Skilled vision. An apprenticeship in breeding aesthetics. Social Anthropology, 12(1), 41-55.
  20. Grasseni, C. (2007). Good Looking: Learning to be a Cattle Breeder. In C. Grasseni (Ed.), Skilled Visions: Between Apprenticeship and Standards. Berghahn Books.
  21. Grasseni, C. (2022). More than visual: The apprenticeship of skilled visions. Ethos, 53(1), 1-19.
  22. Halskov, M., & Junker, S. (2021). Ukrainere føler sig stavnsbundne hos danske landmænd Fagbladet 3F. https://fagbladet3f.dk/ukrainere-foeler-sig-stavnsbundne-hos-danske-landmaend/
  23. Hamilton, L., & McCabe, D. (2016). It’s just a job’: Understanding emotion work, de-animalization and the compartmentalization of organized animal slaughter. Organization, 23(3), 330–350.
  24. Horton, E. P., & Whyte, Z. (2024). “You are too expensive, you need to work faster!”: Ukrainian agricultural workers navigating precarities in Denmark. International Migration, 63(99), [E-pub ahead of print]. doi:10.1111/imig.13289.
  25. Howes, D. (2021). Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Routledge.
  26. Ingold, T., & Palsson, G. (2013). Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Jones, S., & Yarrow, T. (2022). The Object of Conservation: An Ethnography of Heritage Practice. Routledge.
  28. Kalantaryan, S., Scipioni, M., Natale, F., & Alessandrini, A. (2021). Immigration and integration in rural areas and the agricultural sector: An EU perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 88, 462-472.
  29. King, R., Lulle, A., & Melossi, E. (2021). New perspectives on the agriculture–migration nexus. Journal of Rural Studies, 85, 52-58.
  30. Kongsted, H., & Mc Loughlin, E. T. (2023). Udfasning af medicinsk zink og lavt forbrug af antibiotika til grise–hvad betyder det for dyrevelfærden? Videnscenter for Dyrevelfærd, Aarhus Universitet.
  31. McLaughlin, J., & Weiler, A. M. (2017). Migrant agricultural workers in local and global contexts: Toward a better life? Journal of Agrarian Change, 17(3), 630-638.
  32. Mc Loughlin, E. (2019). Knowing cows: Transformative mobilizations of human and non‐human bodies in an emotionography of the slaughterhouse. Gender, Work & Organization, 26(3), 322-342.
  33. Mc Loughlin, E. (2024). Protesting the future: The evolution of the European farmer. Anthropology Today, 40(5), 3-6.
  34. Modood, T., & Thompson, S. (2022). Othering, alienation and establishment. Political Studies, 70(3), 780-796.
  35. Monbiot, G. (2024). Agrarian Populism. GeorgeMonbiot.com. https://www.monbiot.com/2024/01/24/agrarian-populism/
  36. Ní Laoire, C. (2005). ‘You’re not a man at all!’: masculinity, responsibility, and staying on the land in contemporary Ireland. Irish Journal of Sociology, 14(2), 94-114.