Who knows? Mobilization of Employee Knowledge in Nursing Homes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v9i1.143674

Keywords:

Knowledge, Elderly care, Nursing homes, Innovation, Logic of care

Abstract

In Norway, as in many other countries, professionalized elderly care faces a twin challenge: lack of competent labor combined with disinvestment in elderly care. Furthermore, while the number of elderly people in need of care is projected to rise over the coming decades, politicians are reluctant to commit more resources to the sector. Instead, innovation is seen as the solution. But in the policy debate on these issues, innovation is largely understood to be technological. This paper argues that the experience-based knowledge of assistants, healthcare professionals and nurses working in elderly care is an overlooked resource for innovation. By discussing three ways such knowledge is mobilized for innovation in nursing homes, we show that employee knowledge can help solve problems articulate under a logic of care, but also to solve problems traditionally thought of as belonging to the domain of management.

Author Biographies

Stian Bragtved, Nordland Research Institute

Stian Bragtvedt is a senior researcher at Nordland Research Institute, Norway. His research interests are public sector innovation, welfare services, knowledge sharing and the labor process.

Ragnhild Holmen Waldahl, Nordland Research Institute

Ragnhild Holmen Waldahl is senior researcher at Nordland Research Institute, Norway. Her research interests are welfare service innovation, organization of welfare services and services for the elderly.

References

Anvik, C., Vedeler, J. S., Wegener, C., Slettebø, Å., & Ødegård, A. (2020). Practice-based learning and innovation in nursing homes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 32(2), 122–134. Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2012). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, 8th ed.

Bradbury, H., G. Roth, & M. Gearty, (2015). The practice of learning history: Local and open system approaches. The SAGE handbook of action research.

Brown, J.S. & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities of practice. Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science(2)1, pp. 40–57.

Cambridge Dictionary. “Mobilize,” retrieved in November 2023 from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/

Dahl, H. M. (2017). Struggles in (elderly) care: A feminist view. Springer. Duguid, P. (2012). ‘The art of knowing’: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. In The knowledge economy and lifelong learning (pp. 147–162). Brill. Ellström, P. E. (2010). Practice‐based innovation: a learning perspective. Journal of Workplace learning, 22(1/2), 27–40. Fraser, N. (2017). Crisis of Care? On the social reproductive contradictions of contemporary capitalism. In Bhattacharya, T. Social reproduction theory: Remapping class, recentering oppression. London: Pluto Books. Grimsmo, A., Kirchhoff, R., & Aarseth, T. (2015). Samhandlingsreformen i Norge. Haukelien, H. (2021). Aldring, eldreomsorg og den nye velferdsstaten. Norsk Antropologisk Tidsskrift, (3-4), 179–195.

Helsedirektoratet (2018). Årsrapport omsorg 2020. Helsedirektoratet

Hoppania, H. K., Olakivi, A., Zechner, M., & Näre, L. (2021). Managerialism as a failing response to the care crisis. In L. L. Hansen, H. M. Dahl & L Horn (eds), A Care Crisis in the Nordic Welfare States? (pp. 100–119). Policy Press.

Høyrup, S., Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Hasse, C., Lotz, M. & Møller, K. (eds.) (2014). Employee-Driven Innovation: A New Approach. 1st ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Josefson, I. (1988). The nurse as engineer—the theory of knowledge in research in the care sector. In Göranzon, B. & Josefson, I. Knowledge, skill and artificial intelligence (pp. 19–30). Springer London.

Kovalainen, A. (2021). Crisis of care: a problem of economization, of technologization or of politics of care? In L. L. Hansen, H. M. Dahl & L Horn (eds), A Care Crisis in the Nordic Welfare States? (pp. 60–80). Policy Press. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.

Lindenberg, Siegwart. 2001. Intrinsic Motivation in a New Light. Kyklos 54 (2-3): 317–342. Liveng, A. (2007). Omsorgsarbejde, subjektivitet og læring: Social- og sundhedshjælperelevers orienteringer mod omsorgsarbejdet og deres møde med arbejdets læringsrum [Doctoral dissertation]. Roskilde University, Psychology & Educational Studies. Lundvall, B. Å. (2016). The learning economy and the economics of hope. Anthem Press. Miles, M.B. (Ed.) (1964). Innovation in Education. Teachers College Press. Columbia University, New York Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge.

NOU 2023: 4. Tid for handling — Personellet i en bærekraftig helse- og omsorgstjeneste

Polyani, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. London: Routledge.

Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Therborn, G. (1999). The ideology of power and the power of ideology (Vol. 24). Verso.

DIVISION., U. N. D. O. E. A. S. A. P. (2021). World population ageing 2019. UNITED NATIONS.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-25

How to Cite

Bragtved, S., & Waldahl, R. H. (2024). Who knows? Mobilization of Employee Knowledge in Nursing Homes. Qualitative Studies, 9(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.7146/qs.v9i1.143674

Issue

Section

Articles in English