Politisering af frivillighed i samspillet mellem den offentlige og den frivillige sektor: ”Vi skal tænke gadekæret ind”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v51i4.131174Resumé
Der er bred enighed om, at samspillet mellem den offentlige og den frivillige sektor har ændret karakter de seneste årtier. Men hvad betyder det for forståelsen af begreber som frivillighed og borger og relationen mellem borger og stat? Denne artikel undersøger politiske diskurser omkring samspillet mellem den frivillige og den offentlige sektor. Teoretisk tages der udgangspunkt i politisk antropologis forståelse af politik som en fortolkningspraksis, som skaber og definerer mening om og i den sociale verden. Det empiriske materiale udgøres af 30 interviews med lokalpolitikere og forvaltningschefer fra fem danske kommuner. På baggrund af kritisk diskursanalyse viser analysen, hvordan politiske diskurser konstruerer en ideal borgeridentitet og en forståelse af kommunen som et konsensusbåret fællesskab. Disse konstruktioner legitimeres via reference til idylliserede fremstillinger af fælles kulturelle og historiske symboler.
Referencer
Agger, Annika (2015). Hvilke potentialer og udfordringer er der ved tidlig inddragelse af borgere i samproduktion af styring? Politica 47 (2): 185-201.
Amnå, Erik (2006). Still a trustworthy ally? Civil society and the transformation of Scandinavian democracy. Journal of Civil Society 2 (1): 1-20.
Boje, Thomas P. (2017). Civilsamfund, medborgerskab og deltagelse. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Brandsen, Taco og Victor Pestoff (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review 8 (4): 493-501.
Casey, John og Bronwen Dalton (2006). The best of times, the worst of times: Community-sector advocacy in the age of compacts. Australian Journal of Political Science 41 (1): 23-38
Civil Exchange (2015). Whose Society? The Final “Big Society” Audit. http://www.civilexchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Whose-Society_The-Final-Big-Society-Audit_final.pdf
Craig, Gary, Marilyn Taylor og Tessa Parkes (2004). Protest or partnership? The voluntary and community sectors in the policy process. Social Policy & Administration 38 (3): 221-239
Cruickshank, Jørn (2012). The role of qualitative interviews in discourse theory. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 6 (1): 38-52.
EU-Kommisionen (2011). Meddelelse om EU-politikker og frivilligt arbejde: Anerkendelse og fremme af frivillige aktiviteter på tværs af grænserne i EU. 20. september. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0568:FIN:DA:PDF
Evers, Adalbert (2009). Civicness and civility: Their meanings for social services. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 20 (3): 239-259.
Evers, Adalbert og Jean-Louis Laville (2004). Defining the third sector in Europe, pp. 11-42 i Adalbert Evers og Jean-Louis Laville (red.), The Third Sector in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
Evers, Adalbert og Anne-Marie Guillemard (2013). Reconfiguring welfare and reshaping citizenship, pp. 359-389 i Adalbert Evers og Anne-Marie Guillemard (red.), Social Policy and Citizenship: The Changing Landscape. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ewert, Benjamin og Adalbert Evers (2012). Co-production: Contested meanings and challenges for user organizations, i Victor Pestoff, Taco Brandsen og Bram Verschuere (red.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman L. (1985). Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 9: 739-763.
Fairclough, Norman L. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, Norman L. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. Pearson Education.
Fairclough, Norman L. (2016). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research, pp. 86-108 i Ruth Wodak og Michael Meyer (red.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Faxe kommune (2013) Frivillighed i Faxe Kommune – En strategisk ramme. Center for Kultur, Frivillighed og Borgerservice.
Ferragina, Emanuele og Alessandro Arrigoni (2017). The rise and fall of social capital: Requiem for a theory? Political Studies Review 15 (3): 355-367.
Freise, Matthias og Thorsten Hallmann (2014). Modernizing Democracy? Associations and Associating in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Springer.
Grubb, Ane og Lars Skov Henriksen (2019). On the changing civic landscape in Denmark and its consequences for civic action. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00054-8
Henriksen, Lars Skov (2015). Contradictions and controversies in Danish civil society discourse. Cursiv 15: 17-27.
Henriksen, Lars Skov og Peter Bundesen (2004). The moving frontier in Denmark: Voluntary-state relationships since 1850. Journal of Social Policy 33 (4): 605-615.
Henriksen, Lars Skov, Steven R. Smith og Anette Zimmer (2015). Welfare mix and hybridity. Flexible adjustments to changed environments. Introduction to the special issue. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 26 (5): 1591-1600.
Hodgson, Susan M. og Zoë Irving (2007). Policy Reconsidered: Meanings, Politics and Practices. Bristol: Policy Press.
Hodgeson, Lesley (2004). Manufactured civil society: Counting the cost. Critical Social Policy 24 (2): 139-164.
Hustinx, Lesley (2014). Volunteering in a hybrid institutional and organizational environment: An emerging research agenda, i Matthias Freise og Thorsten Hallmann (red.), Modernizing Deocracy: Associations and Associating in the 21st Century. New York: Springer.
Hustinx, Lesley, Els De Waele og Chloë Delcour (2015). Hybridisation in a corporatist third sector regime: Paradoxes of “responsibilised autonomy”. Voluntary Sector Review 6 (2): 115-134.
Ibsen, Bjarne og Klaus Levinsen (2017). Kommunale institutioners samarbejde med foreninger og frivillige. Movements, Syddansk Universitet.
Ibsen Bjarne og Helle H. Espersen (2016). Kommunernes samarbejde med civile aktører – Forskelle og ligheder i forventninger, praksis, samarbejdspartnere og oplevet udbytte. Syddansk Universitet og KORA.
Ilcan, Suzan og Tanya Basok (2004). Community government: Voluntary agencies, social justice, and the responsibilization of citizens. Citizenship Studies 8 (2): 129-144
Jakobsen, Morten og Simon C. Andersen (2013). Co-production and equity in public service delivery. Public Administration Review 73 (5): 704-713.
Jöhncke, Steffen, Mette Svendsen og Susan R. Whyte (2004). Løsningsmodeller – Sociale teknologier som antropologisk arbejdsfelt, pp. 385-408 i Kirsten Hastrup (red.), Viden om verden. En grundbog i antropologisk analyse. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Koselleck, Reinhart (1982). Begriffsgeschichte and social history. Economy and Society 11 (4): 409-427.
Kvale, Steinar (1994). InterView. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Lorentzen, Håkon og Lesley Hustinx (2007). Civic involvement and modernization. Journal of Civil Society 3 (2): 101-118.
Mautner, Gerlinde (2016). Checks and balances: How corpus linguistics can contribute to CDA, pp. 154-179 i Ruth Wodak og M. Meyer (red.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
Odense Kommune (2011). Ny virkelighed ny velfærd. Odense Byråd.
OECD (2011). Together for better public services: Partnering with citizens and civil society. OECD Public Governance Reviews, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264118843-en
Ostrom, Elinor (2000). Crowding out citizenship. Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 3-16.
Ostrom, Elinor (2012). Foreword, pp. xv-xvii i Victor Pestoff, Taco Brandsen og Bram Verschuere (red.), New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-production. London: Routledge.
Pestoff, Victor (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations 23 (4): 1102-1118.
Rasmussen, Erik (1971). Komparativ politik. København: Gyldendal.
Regeringen (2017). Strategi for et stærkere civilsamfund. Børne- og Socialministeriet 2017/18:8. https://www.regeringen.dk/publikationer-og-aftaletekster/strategi-for-et-staerkere-civilsamfund/
Sheperd, Laura J. (2015). Constructing civil society: Gender, power and legitimacy in United Nations peacebuilding discourse. European Journal of International Relations 21 (4): 887-910.
Shore, Cris og Susan Wright (1997). Anthropology of Policy: Critical Perspectives on Governance and Power. London: Routledge.
Shore, Cris, Susan Wright og Davide Però (2011). Policy Worlds: Anthropology and the Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York: Berghan Books – EASA-series.
Åkerstrøm Andersen, Niels (1999). Reinhart Kosellecks begrebshistorie, pp. 64-87 i Diskursive analysestrategier: Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau, Luhmann. København: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
LicensOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
