Kontraprotest – unges politiske engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v53i1.129854Nøgleord:
unge, politisk engagement, kontraprotest, latent engagement, den konventionelle borgerResumé
På baggrund af The International Civic and Citizenship Education Study samt et kvalitativt studie af danske unge født i starten af 00’erne ønsker denne artikel at undersøge og diskutere såvel empirisk som teoretisk en række af de afgørende erfaringer og opfattelser, som ligger til grund for og former disse unges politiske engagement. De to studier viser, at der er stor politisk vilje, interesse og viden blandt unge, men samtidig en udbredt reservation over for at protestere og at deltage i offentlige politiske aktiviteter. Artiklens tese er, at deres engagementsform kan betragtes som en kontraprotest. Kontraprotesten dækker over et stigende engagement, som fravælger protest og støtter op om det konventionelle system, hvorved der frigives ressourcer til nye og anderledes typer af samfundsmæssige engagementer.
Referencer
Amnå, Erik og Joakim Ekman (2014). Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review: EPSR 6 (2): 261-281.
Amnå, Erik og Pär Zetterberg (2010). A political science perspective on socialization research: Young Nordic citizens in a comparative light, pp. 43-65 i Lonnie R. Sherrod, Judith Torney-Purta og Constance A. Flanagan (red.), Handbook of Research on Civic Engagement in Youth. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Andersen, Jørgen Goul og Jens Hoff (2001). Democracy and Citizenship in Scandinavia. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Arendt, Hannah (2017). Menneskets vilkår. København: Gyldendal.
Beck, Ulrich (1997). Risikosamfundet: På vej mod en ny modernitet. København: Hans Reitzel.
Bolt, Mikkel (2017). Trumps kontrarevolution. København: Nemo.
Boltanski, Luc og Eve Chiapello (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.
Briggs, Jacqueline (2017). Young People and Political Participation Teen Players. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Bruun, Jens, Jonas Lieberkind og Heidi Bay Schunck (2018). Unge, skole og demokrati: Hovedresultater af ICCS 2016. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Butler, Judith (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
Corbin, Juliet og Janice M. Morse (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry 9 (3): 335-354.
Davies, Bronwyn (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler’s analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education 27 (4): 425-438.
Ekman, Joakim og Erik Amnå (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs 22 (3): 283-300.
Giddens, Anthony (1994). Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Oxford: Polity Press.
Gubrium, Jaber F. og James A. Holstein (2003). Postmodern Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hansen, Mogens Herman (2010). Demokrati som styreform og som ideologi. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
Hooghe, Marc og Yves Dejaeghere (2007). Does the “monitorial citizen” exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the Nordic countries. Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (2): 249-271.
Husted, Emil (2015). Organiseringen af alternativ politisk deltagelse: Udkast til en typologi. Politik 18 (3): 13-23.
ICCS Data (2018). https://www.iea.nl/data-tools/repository/iccs
Inglehart, Ronald (1971). The silent revolution in Europe: Intergenerational change in post-industrial societies. The American Political Science Review 65 (4): 991-1017.
Järvinen, Margaretha (2005). Intervíew i en interaktionistisk begrebsramme, i Margaretha Järvinen og Nanna Mik-Meyer (red.), Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv: Interview, observationer og dokumenter. København: Hans Reitzel.
Korsch, Karl (1973). Staten og kontrarevolutionen: udvalgte artikler 1929-1950. København: Jørgen Paludan.
Marcuse, Herbert (1972). Counterrevolution and Revolt. Boston: Beacon Press.
Melo, Daniela F. og Daniel Stockemer (2012). Age and political participation in Germany, France and the UK: A comparative analysis. Comparative European Politics 12 (1): 33-53.
Morton, Adam David (2007). Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. London: Pluto Press.
Mouffe, Chantal (2005). On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mouffe, Chantal (2018). For a Left Populism. London: Verso.
Nielsen, Knud Holt (2015). Elevoprør og studenteroprør i Danmark: Protestaktiviteter blandt lærlinge, elever og studerende 1960-2014. København: KULT.
Oser, Jennifer og Marc Hooghe (2013). The evolution of citizenship norms among Scandinavian adolescents, 1999-2009. Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (4): 320-346.
Pachi, Dinitra og Martyn Barrett (2012). Perceived effectiveness of conventional, non-conventional and civic forms of participation among minority and majority youth. Postdisciplinary Humanities & Social Sciences Quarterly 22 (3): 345-359.
Pitti, Ilaria (2018). Youth and Unconventional Political Engagement. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Popp-Madsen, Benjamin Ask (2014). Debatterende eller besluttende offentlighed? Om demokrati, offentlighed og den konstituerende magt hos Carl Schmitt og Hannah Arendt. Slagmark 69: 35-51.
Putnam, Robert D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Rancière, Jacques (1999). Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Rensmann, Lars (2017). The noisy counter-revolution: Understanding the cultural conditions and dynamics of populist politics in Europe in the digital age. Politics and Governance 5 (4): 123-135.
Schudson, Michael (1998). The Good Citizen: A History of American Civic Life. New York: Martin Kessler Books.
Schudson, Michael (2000). Good citizens and bad history: Today’s political ideals in historical perspective. The Communication Review 4 (1): 1-19.
Schulz, Wolfram, John Ainley og Julian Fraillion (2011). ICCS 2009 Technical Report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Schulz, Wolfram, John Ainley, Julian Fraillon, Bruno Losito, Gabriella Agrusti og Tim Friedman (2018). Becoming Citizens in a Changing World: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2016 International Report. Amsterdam: Springer.
Schulz, Wolfram, Ralf Carstens, Bruno Losito og Julian Fraillon (2018). ICCS 2016 Technical Report. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Sloam, James (2016). Youth political participation in Europe. A new participatory landscape, pp. 287-294 i Andy Furlong (red.), Routledge Handbook of Youth and Young Adulthood. New York: Routledge.
Stolle, Dietlind og Marc Hooghe (2011). Shifting inequalities: Patterns of exclusion and inclusion in emerging forms of political participation. European Societies 13 (1): 119-142.
Sveningsson, Malin (2016). “I wouldn’t have what it takes”: Young Swedes’ understandings of political participation. Young 24 (2): 139-156.
Swyngedouw, Erik (2018). Promises of the Political: Insurgent Cities in a Post-Political Environment. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Søndergaard, Dorthe Marie (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 15 (2): 187-204.
Weber, Eugen (1974). Revolution? Counterrevolution? What revolution? Journal of Contemporary History 9 (2): 3-47.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
LicensOphavsretten tilhører Politica. Materialet må ikke bruges eller distribueres i kommercielt øjemed.
