Teater og litteratur

Et ontologisk aspekt af forholdet mellem de to

Forfattere

  • Olga Serveevna GIlyazova
  • Morten Visby

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/pas.v40i93.159691

Nøgleord:

Literature, Post-drama, Bertolt Brecht, Hans-Thies Lehmann, Ontology

Resumé

Theatre and Literature: An Ontological Aspect of their Relationship

The analysis of a dramatic work is generally characterized by two approaches, which are frequently counter-posed to each other: The approach based on theatre studies tends to narrow down a dramatic text to a script, while the approach based on literary studies tends to see the above text without regard to its theatrical implementation. In our essay, we assume that these two approaches are intertwined: A dramatic work is meant for theatrical performance, which makes it different from  other forms of literature. The theatrical nature of dramatic works leaves an imprint on their literary characteristics. We offer a new way of looking at the relationship between the performance text and the dramatic text from the ontological, semiotic, and communicative perspective. 

Referencer

Aristoteles (2004): Poetikken, oversat af Niels Henningsen, København: Det Lille Forlag.

Barboy, Yu (1988): Structure of the Action and the Contemporary Performance, Leningrad: LGITMIK.

Barboy, Yu (2008): On the Theory of Theatre: Student Book, Sankt Petersborg: SPGATI.

Bentley, Eric (1967): The Life of the Drama, New York: Atheneum.

Bouko, Catherine (2009): “The Musicality of Postdramatic Theater: Hans-Thies Lehmann’s Theory of Independent Auditory Semiotics”, i Gramma: Journal of Theory and Criticism 17, s. 25-34.

Brecht, Bertolt (1960): Om tidens teater. En ikke-aristotelisk dramatik, oversat af Harald Engberg, København: Gyldendal.

Brecht, Bertolt og Carl Richard Mueller (1961): “On the Experimental Theatre”, i The Tulane Drama Review 6.1, s. 2-17, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1125000.

Eisenstein, Sergei (2010): Toward a Theory of Montage, London, New York: I.B. Tauris.

Fischer-Lichte, Erika (2004): “The Sign Language of the Theatre”, i E. Fischer-Lichte og A. Chepurov (red.): Theatre Studies of Germany: System of Coordinates, Sankt Petersborg: Baltyisky Sezony, s. 63-84.

Fischer-Lichte, Erika (2008): The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics, oversat af Saskya Iris Jain, London: Routledge.

Genette, Gérard. (1983): Narrative Discourse: An Essay in Method, 3. udgave, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Gilyazova, Olga Serveevna (2019): “The Relationship Between Virtual and Actual Reality: Phenomenological-Ontological Approach”, i Journal of History Culture and Art Research 8.1, s. 196-204.

Grotowski, Jerzy (1968/2012): Theatre and Ritual, http://www.theatre-library.ru/files/g/grotovski/grotovski_1.html.

Grotowski, Jerzy (1968/2002): Towards a Poor Theatre, red. Eugenio Barba, New York: Brook Routledge.

Hamburger, Maik og Simon Williams (2008): Theatertreffen. A History of German Theatre, New York: Cambridge

University Press, s. 378-395.

Iser, Wolfgang (2001): “Acts of Fiction, or What is Fictitious in the Fictional Text”, i German Philosophical Literature Studies of Our Days: Anthology, Sankt Petersborg: St Petersburg University Press, s. 186-216.

Jürs-Munby, Karen (2006): “Introduction”, i Hans-Thies Lehmann (red.): Postdramatic Theatre, London: Routledge, s. 1-15.

Khalizev, B. E. (1988): “Dramatic Work and Some Problems of its Study”, i V. M. Markovich (red.): Analysis of a Dramatic Work: Collection, Leningrad: Publishing House of Leningrad University, s. 6-27.

Lehmann, Hans-Thies (2006): Postdramatic Theatre, oversat og introduceret af Karen Jürs-Munby, London: Routledge.

Lotman, Yuri (2010): Semiosphere, St. Petersburg: Iskusstvo.

Malyutina, N. (2012): “The Image of Historical Time from the Angle of the Audience’s Perception of the Contemporary Drama”, i N. Seibel et al., Chelyabinsk (red.): Literature and Theatre: Interaction Models, Chelyabinsk, Encyclopedia OOO, s. 32-38.

Paramonov, B. (1997): The End of the Style, Moskva: Agraf, Aleteya.

Pesochinsky, N. (2011): “Methods of Theatre Studies and Theatre Studies Schools”, i Yu. Barboy et al. (red.): Introduction into Theatre Studies, Sankt Petersborg: St Petersburg Theatre Art State Academy, s. 70-111.

Ponomareva, E. (2012): “From the Discussion Material for the Report: Dramatic Potential of Small Prose in Depiction of Historic Reality of the 1920s”, i N. Seibel et al. (red.): Literature and Theatre: Interaction Models, Chelyabinsk: Encyclopedia OOO, s. 67-78.

Prazdnikov, G. (2011): “Theatre Studies and Science”, i Yu. Barboy et al. (red.): Introduction into Theatre Studies, Sankt Petersborg: St Petersburg Theatre Art State Academy, s. 7-27.

Ricoeur, Paul (1990): “La Métaphore Vive”, i Theory of the Metaphor: Collection, forord af N. Arutyunova, Moskva: Progress, s. 435-455.

Rozin, V. (2000): “Existence, Reality, Virtual Reality”, i Concept of Virtual Worlds and Scientific Knowledge, Sankt Petersborg: RHGI, s. 56-74.

Sarrazac, Jean-Pierre (red.) (2012): Lexicon of Modern and Contemporary Drama, oversat af T. Mogilevskaya, i Contemporary Dramaturgy 2, s. 213-219.

Schapiro, M. (1972): “Some Problems of Visual Art Semiotics: Space of Representation and Tools for Creating a Sign-Image”, i Semiotics and Artmetry, Moskva: Mir, s. 136-163.

Tamarchenko, N., V. Tyupa og S. Broitmain (2004): “Theory of Artistic Discourse: Theoretical Poetics”, i N. Tamarchenko (red.): Theory of Literature: Student Book, bd. 1, Moskva: Akademia.

Tarshis, N. (2011): “Theatre Criticism and Theatre Studies”, i Yu Barboy et al. (red.): Introduction into Theatre Studies, Sankt Petersborg: St Petersburg Theatre Art State Academy, s. 161-170.

Zakhava, B. (2008): Mastery of the Actor and the Stage Director: Student Book, 5. udgave, Moskva: RATI-GITIS.

Downloads

Publiceret

2025-09-22

Citation/Eksport

GIlyazova, O. S., & Visby, M. (2025). Teater og litteratur: Et ontologisk aspekt af forholdet mellem de to. Passage - Tidsskrift for Litteratur Og Kritik, 40(93), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.7146/pas.v40i93.159691