This is an outdated version published on 2021-05-10. Read the most recent version.

Transmethodology:

Creating spaces for transgressive and transformative inquiry

Authors

  • Iram Khawaja
  • Dorte Kousholt

Abstract

The special issue deals with entanglements, borders, and bridges between ideas, concepts, and spheres often considered separate and distinct elements in research processes that are frequently represented as well-ordered and linear. Under the heading transmethodology, our aim has been to make space for and bring to light the often messy, non-linear, and complex research processes that form our methodologies.

References

Barad, K. (2015) Transmaterialities: Trans*/matter/realities and queer political imaginings. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 2(2): 387–422

Biesta, G.J.J. (2010). Five theses on complexity reduction and its politics. In D.C. Osberg & G.J.J. Biesta (Eds). Complexity theory and the politics of education (pp. 5-13). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Braidotti, R. (2006) Transpositions: On Nomadic Ethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Chen, M. (2012) Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Goulart, D. M. and J. F. P. Torres (2021). Qualitative Epistemology and Constructive-Interpretative Methodology: Contributions for Research in Social Sciences and Humanities. In D. M. Goulart, A. M. Martínez and M. Adams (Eds.), Theory of Subjectivity within cultural-historical perspective: González Rey’s legacy. Springer.

Haug, F. et al. (1987). Female sexualization: A collective work of memory (E. Carter, Trans.). London: Verso.

Lather, P., & St. Pierre, E. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629-633.

Latour, Bruno (1993). We have Never Been Modern. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf

Pryse, M. (2000). Trans/Feminist Methodology: Bridges to Interdisciplinary Thinking. Feminist formations, 12(2), 105-118.

González Rey, F. (2019). Methodological and epistemological demands in advancing the study of subjectivity from a cultural-historical standpoint. Culture & Psychology, 26 (3), p. 562-577. DOI: 10.1177/1354067X19888185

Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? Basingstoke, Macmillan.

Springgay, S., & Truman, S. E. (2017). A Transmaterial Approach to Walking Methodologies: Embodiment, Affect, and a Sonic Art Performance. Body & Society,23(4), 27–58

Springgay, S. & Truman, S.E. (2018) On the Need for Methods Beyond Proceduralism: Speculative Middles, (In) Tensions, and Response-Ability in Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 24 (3), 203-214

Valsiner, J. (2014). Needed for cultural psychology: Methodology in a new key. Culture & Psychology 20(1): 3-30

Downloads

Published

2021-05-10

Versions

How to Cite

Khawaja, I., & Kousholt, D. (2021). Transmethodology: : Creating spaces for transgressive and transformative inquiry. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 22(Special Issue), 1–21. Retrieved from https://tidsskrift.dk/outlines/article/view/126190