Teori gør forskellen: Analytiske strategier i kritisk psykologi

Authors

  • Ernst Schraube
  • Vibeke Jartoft

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7146/nu.v25i2.141582

Keywords:

Critical psychology, theory in psychology, everyday conflictuality, conduct of everyday life, subjectivity, situated critique, strategies of critical knowledge, psychological theory of science

Abstract

Based on Critical Psychology from the Stand- point of the Subject the article describes ana- lytical concerns and strategies of critical psychology. In a first step, the development of

critical psychologies is located in current discussions on the production of knowledge, and three different typical approaches and major steps toward situated critique as a practice of mutual recognition are delineated. This shift, it is argued, has led to a historically new rel- evance of critique, and two basic analytical elements of critical research are introduced: Everyday conflictuality as the initiating mo- ment of critique as well as the importance of theory for critical inquiry. On this basis a variety of analytic strategies and concepts are presented which inform Critical Psychology from the Standpoint of the Subject and suggest a constituent move from partial perspectives toward situated generalization.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-01

How to Cite

Schraube, E., & Jartoft, V. (2017). Teori gør forskellen: Analytiske strategier i kritisk psykologi. Nordiske Udkast, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.7146/nu.v25i2.141582

Issue

Section

Articles