Evaluating the Effects of Globalization on Work: Building upon Awareness, Learning, and Knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.151853Keywords:
Learning & Competencies, Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners, Organization & ManagementAbstract
Phenomenological processes influence how one evaluates globalization, and consequently one’s attitudes toward it. The awareness of, learning about, and knowledge of complex problems have direct effects on how problems are evaluated and managed, even in contexts predominantly based on material interests. We analyze the perceived effects globalization has on work by looking at the attitudes and evaluations of labor union representatives in Finland (N = 334). We propose a tripartite phenomenological model of awareness, learning, and knowledge, and apply it in a crosssectional OLS regression model using 20 explanatory variables. Findings show significant associations for two variables, including employers and supervisors as information sources and effects of foreign branches. The model moderately explains the evaluations of the effects of globalization, despite the sample consisting of social classes with differing life-worlds. This suggests that union representatives’ attitudes toward globalization seem partly contingent on their individual, phenomenological attachment to global circumstances.
Author Biographies
Mika Helander, Åbo Akademi University
Senior Lecturer, Sociological Unit. E-mail: mika.helander@abo.fi
Oliver Saal, Pelastusopisto
Researcher, Research, Development and Innovation Services
References
Helander, M. (2004). Fenomenologisk globalisering. Vardaglig nationalism bland transnationellt aktiva svenska och finländska företagsledare som globala epokens ofullbordan. SSKH Skrifter No. 18. Helsingfors: SSKH vid Helsingfors universitet. [Phenomenological Globalization. Banal Nationalism among Transnationally Active Swedish and Finnish Corporate Executives as the Incompletion of the Global Age]
Helander, M. (ed.) (2008). Going Global. Ay-liikkeen menestysresepti globaalissa ajassa? Helsinki: Sophi, Minerva. [Going Global. The Recipe for Success for the Trade Union Movement in the Global Age?]
Abbott, K. (2011). Theorising international trade unionism, Global Labour Journal, 2(3): 160–179.
Aittola, T. (1999). Possibilities of informal learning inside and outside the school. In Collected Papers of the European Conference on Lifelong Learning, 2nd. Germany: Bremen, February 25–27, 1999, edited by J. Beck, E. Kammler, R. Taylor and H.S. Olesen. Roskilde University.
Akava (2022). Jäsenmäärät, [Number of members] 30 March. https://akava.fi/keita-olemme/jasenliitot/jasenmaarat/ [Accessed 9 September 2022].
Ayeni, E.O., Saman, U.P., & Kasimu, S. (2019). Facts and fiction in positivism and neo positivism, Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(4): 21–33.
Berger, P.L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Penguin Books. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006812X634872.
Bergholm, T. (2003). A Short History of SAK, The Finnish Federation of Trade Unions 1907-1930, The Confederation of Finnish Trade Unions 1930-1969, The Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions 1969. Helsinki: SAK.
Bergholm, T. (2009). The making of the Finnish model: The qualitative change in Finnish Corporatism in the early 1960s, Scandinavian Journal of History, 34(1): 29–48.
Bergholm, T. (2012). The Country Report of Finnish Trade Unions 2012. International Trade Union Policy. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Bergholm, T. & Bieler, A. (2013). Globalization and the erosion of the Nordic model: A Swedish-Finnish comparison, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 19(1): 55–70.
Birelma, A. (2018). When local class unionism meets international solidarity: A case of union revitalisation in Turkey, Global Labour Journal, 9(2): 215–230.
Böckerman, P. & Uusitalo, R. (2006). Erosion of the Ghent system and union membership decline: Lessons from Finland, British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(2): 283–303. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00498.x.
Boldt, P.J., Kaipainen, P., & Turunen, J. (1997). Löntagaren och EMU. Synpunkter på Emu-diskussionen. [The wage-earner and the EMU. Viewpoints on the Emu-discussion]. Helsingfors: Arbetarnas bildningsförbund.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brame, R., Paternoster R., Mazerolle P., & Piquero, A. (1988). Testing for the equality of maximum-likelihood regression coefficients between two independent equations, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 14(3): 245–261.
Burgoon, B. (2004). The rise and stall of labor linkage in globalization politics, International Politics, 41(2): 196–220.
Burnouf, L. (2004). Global awareness and perspectives in global education, Canadian Social Studies, 38(3): 1–12.
Clogg, C.C., Petrova, E., & Haritou, A. (1995). Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models, American Journal of Sociology, 100(5): 1261–1293.
Cseh, M., Davis, E.B., & Khilji, S.E. (2013). Developing a global mindset: Learning of global leaders, European Journal of Training and Development, 37(5): 489–499.
Eila (2003). FS Film. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0343624/ [Accessed 9 September 2022].
Fisher Jr., W.P., & Stenner, A.J. (2011). Integrating qualitative and quantitative research approaches via the phenomenological method, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(1): 89–103.
Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick, US & London, UK: AldineTransaction.
Graham, P., & Paulsen, N. (2002). Third-sector discourses and the future of (Un)employment: Skilled labor, new technologies, and the meaning of work, Text & Talk, 22(3): 443–467.
Guthrie, S. (1995). The role of tacit knowledge in judgement and decision making. In R. Koesler and R. Watters (eds.), Proceedings of the 1995 International Conference on Outdoor Recreation and Education. Pocatello: Idaho State University Press.
Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P.A. Hall and D. Sockice (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hämäläinen, U. (1998). Lännettymisen lyhyt historia. [The short history of westernisation]. Porvoo: WSOY.
Haman, K., & Kelly, J. (2008). Varieties of capitalism and industrial relations, In P. Blyton, J. Fiorito, N.A. Bacon, & E. Heery (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations. London: SAGE Publications.
Hanvey, R.G. (1982). An attainable global perspective, Theory into Practice, XXI(3): 162–167.
Hegel, G.F.W. (1979). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, Lifelong Learning and the Learning Society: Sociological Perspectives. London & New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203001677-20.
Kaitila, J., Sorsa, V-P., & Alaja, A. (2022). The power of the economic outlook: An ideational explanation of the distinct pattern of Finnish wage setting within the Nordic context, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(4): 471–490.
Kelly, P.F., & Olds, K. (1999). Questions in a crisis: The contested meanings of globalization in the Asia-Pacific. In K. Olds, P. Dicken, P.F. Kelly, L. Kong, & H.W. Yeung (eds.), Globalization and the Asia-Pacific: Contested Territories. London: Routledge.
Kjellberg A. (2023). Den svenska modellen ur ett nordiskt perspektiv: Facklig anslutning och nytt huvudavtal. [The Swedish model from a Nordic perspective: Union membership and the new peak agreement]. Arena idé. Lund University.
Klein, P., Pawson, E., Solem, M., & Ray, W. (2014). Geography education for “An Attainable Global Perspective”, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 38(1): 17–27.
Marsh, C. (1979). Problems with Surveys: Method or Epistemology? Sociology, 13(2): 293–305.
Knight, K.W. (2016). Public awareness and perception of climate change: a qualitative cross-national study, Environmental Sociology, 2(1): 101–113.
Lorenzo-Seva, U., Timmerman, M.E., & Kiers, H.A.L. (2011). ‘The Hull Method for Selecting the Number of Common Factors’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(2): 340–364. DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2011.564527
Marsick, V.J., & Watkins, K.E. (2015). Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. London: Routledge.
Mayoh, J., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2014). Surveying the landscape of mixed methods phenomenological research, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 8(1): 2–14.
McGuire, D. (2014). Analysing union power, opportunity and strategic capability: Global and local union struggles against the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), Global Labour Journal, 5(1): 45–67.
Medlingsinstitutet (2024). English language presentation of the organisation under the heading "About us" on the webpage. https://www.mi.se/english/about-us/ [Accessed 17 April 2024].
Ojala, J., Eloranta, J., & Jalava, J. (2006). The Road to Prosperity: An Economic History of Finland. Helsinki: SKS.
Perkins, R.M. (2012). The Multicultural Awareness, Knowledge, Skills and Attitudes of Prospective Teachers: A Quantitative and Heuristic Phenomenological Study. University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. Routledge & Keegan Paul.
Ritzer, G. (2007). The Blackwell Companion to Globalization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Ritzer, G. (2012). The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Rudmin, F.W. (1994). Gender differences in the semantics of ownership: A quantitative phenomenological survey study, Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(3): 487–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(94)90026-4.
SAK (2022). Jäsenmäärät. https://www.sak.fi/ammattiliitot/jasenliitot/jasenmaarat [Accessed 9 September 2022].
Scholte, J.A. (2008). Defining globalization, The World Economy, 31(11): 1471–1502.
Schütz, A. (1962). Collected Papers I: The Problem of Social Reality. M. Natanson (ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Schütz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Schütz, A. (2011). Collected Papers V: Phenomenology and the Social Sciences. L. Embree (ed.). Dord: Springer Science+Business Media.
Selg, P., Klaschke, B., & Nõgisto, J. (2022). Wicked problems and sociology: Building a missing bridge through processual relationalism. International Review of Sociology, 2022: 1–26.
Sippola, M., & Bergholm, T. (2023). Finland: Trade unions struggling within a Ghent system. In J. Waddington (ed.), Trade Unions in the European Union: Picking up the Pieces of the Neoliberal Challenge. Travail et Société / Work and Society, vol. 86, Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.3726/b20254.
Smith, N., & Hay, C. (2008). Mapping the political discourse of globalization and European integration in the United Kingdom and Ireland empirically, European Journal of Political Research, 47(3): 359–382.
So, A.Y. (1990). Social Change and Development. Modernization, Dependency and World-System Theories. Sage Library of Social Research, No 178. Sage, Newsbury Park, London, New Delhi.
STTK (2021). STTK on 75 vuotta, [STTK is 75 years old]. 1 November. https://www.sttk.fi/2021/10/29/sttk-tayttaa-tanaan-75-vuotta/ [Accessed 9 September 2022].
Taylor, M., & Rioux, S. (2018). Global Labour Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Vesa, J., Kantola, A., & Skorkjær Bindercrantz, A. (2018). A stronghold for routine corporatism? The involvement of interest groups in policy making in Finland, Scandinavian Political Studies, 41(2): 239–262.
Walchuk, B. (2011). Union democracy and labour rights: A cautionary tale, Global Labour Journal, 2(2): 106–124.
Walter, S. (2021). The backlash against globalization, Annual Review of Political Science, 24: 421–442.
Yle (2022). Ylen puoluekannatusmittaus: tutki, miten puolueiden kannatus on muuttunut viime vuosina, 3 February. [Opinion polls by the Finnish Broadcasting Company Yle: Investigate how the party support has changed during recent years]. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-10509309 [Accessed 14 September 2022].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at bo.carstens@gmail.com. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
