Exploring Professional Agency in Domestic Violence Interventions Within Social and Health Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.151240Keywords:
Learning & Competencies, Organization & ManagementAbstract
While the existing research on domestic violence (DV) interventions has provided substantial insights into the challenges associated with addressing DV, the factors that facilitate its intervention in social and health care remain under-researched. This study focuses on DV intervention practices that professionals have deemed successful and employs subject-centered sociocultural theories of professional agency to analyze how professional agency is manifested in these situations. To this end, 10 focus group interviews were conducted with 45 experienced social and health care professionals. The collected data were subjected to thematic content analysis. The findings illustrate how professional agency is manifested in various contexts: through understanding DV as a phenomenon and its contextual factors (epistemic agency), launching a process (processual agency), collaborating with other professionals (relational agency), and reflecting on one’s own actions and emotions (reflective agency).
References
Allen-Leap, M., Hooker, L., Wild, K., Wilson, I. M., Pokharel, B., & Taft, A. (2023). Seeking help from primary health-care providers in high-income countries: A scoping review of the experiences of migrant and refugee survivors of domestic violence, Trauma, Violence & Abuse 24(5): 3715–3731. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221137664
Ambrose-Miller, W., & Ashcroft, R. (2016). Challenges faced by social workers as members of interprofessional collaborative health care teams, Health & Social Work 41(2): 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/hsw/hlw006
Bellis, M. A., Hughes, K., Ford, K., Ramos Rodriguez, G., Sethi, D., & Passmore, J. (2019). Life course health consequences and associated annual costs of adverse childhood experiences across Europe and North America: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet Public Health 4(10): 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30145-8
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews, SAGE Publications Ltd.
Carlsson, N. (2020). Lärosätenas utbildningsbehov i frågor om mäns våld mot kvinnor och våld i nära relationer. Göteborg’s Universitet. Institutionen för socialt arbete. Slutrapport. https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2021-06/La%CC%88rosa%CC%88tenas%20utbildningsbehov%20i%20fra%CC%8Agor%20om%20ma%CC%88ns%20va%CC%8Ald_Slutrapport_200712sista.pdf
Carstensen, K., Burau, V., Dahl, H. M., & Nielsen Hald, A. (2022). How welfare professions contribute to the making of welfare governance: Professional agency and institutional work in elder care, Journal of Social Policy 51(4): 900–919.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000271
Cleak, H., Hunt, G., Hardy, F., Davies, B., & Bell, J. (2021). Health staff responses to domestic and family violence: The case for training to build confidence and skills, Australian Social Work 74(1): 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2020.1808029
Goicolea, I., Bäckström, H., Lauri, M., Carbin, M., & Linander, I. (2023). Daring to ask about violence? A critical examination of social services’ policies on asking about gender-based violence, Journal of Gender-Based Violence 7(3): 467–482. https://doi.org/10.1332/239868021X16914328798715
Collin, K., Paloniemi, S., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Multiple forms of professional agency for (non)-crafting work practices in a hospital organization, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 5(3a): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407X.2020.1808029
Collin, K., Lemmetty, S., Herranen, S., Paloniemi, S., Auvinen, T., & Riivari, E. (2017). Professional agency and creativity in information technology work. In M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (Eds.), Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development (pp. 249–270). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_13
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color, Stanford Law Review 43(6): 1241–1299. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1229039
Damşa, C. I., Kirschner, P. A., Andriessen, J. E. B., Erkens, G., & Sins, P. H. M. (2010). Shared epistemic agency: An empirical study of an emergent construct, Journal of the Learning Sciences 19(2): 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508401003708381
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? The American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K. Hökkä, P. K., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work, Educational Research Review 10: 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Etherington, N., & Baker, L. (2018). From “buzzword” to best practice: Applying intersectionality to children exposed to intimate partner violence, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 19(1): 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016631128
Farnsworth, J., & Boon, B. (2010). Analysing group dynamics within the focus group, Qualitative Research 10(5): 605–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110375223
Ferguson, H. (2018). How social workers reflect in action and when and why they don’t: The possibilities and limits to reflective practice in social work, Social Work Education, 27(4): 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2017.1413083
FRA (2014). European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. EU-wide survey: Violence against women. Main results report. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/violence-against-women-eu-wide-survey-main-results-report.
Gioia, D., Corley, K., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology, Organizational Research Methods 16(1): 15–31.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
GREVIO. (2019). Istanbul convention: Baseline evaluation report Finland. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/grevio-report-on-finland/168097129d
Heron, R. L., & Eisma, M. C. (2021). Barriers and facilitators of disclosing domestic violence to the healthcare service: A systematic review of qualitative research, Health & Social Care in the Community 29(3): 612–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13282
Hitlin, S., & Elder, G. H. (2007). Time, self, and the curiously abstract concept of agency, Sociological Theory 25(2): 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2007.00303.x
Husso, M., Notko, M., Virkki, T., Holma, J., Laitila, A., & Siltala, H. (2021). Domestic violence interventions in social and health care settings: Challenges of temporary projects and short-term solutions, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 36(23–24): 11461–11482. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605198984
Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Herranen, S., & Eteläpelto, A. (2019). Emotions in leaders’ enactment of professional agency, Journal of Workplace Learning 31(2): 143–165. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-07-2018-0086
Hökkä, P., Vähäsantanen, K. & Ikävalko, H. (2022). An integrative approach to emotional agency at work, Vocations and Learning 16: 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-022-09299-3
Jarnkvist, K., & Brännström, L. (2019). Stories of victimization: Self-positioning and construction of gender in narratives of abused women, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 34(21–22): 4687–4712. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516676
Kadzin, A. E. (2011). Conceptualizing the challenge of reducing interpersonal violence, Psychology of Violence 1(3): 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022990
Kangas, O. & Kalliomaa-Puha, L. (2022). Finland finalises its largest-ever social and healthcare reform. European Comission. European Social Policy Network. ESPN Flash Report 2022/39. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?pager.offset=20&advSearchKey=ESPNFlash&mode=advancedSubmit&catId=22&doc_submit=&policyArea=0&policyAreaSub=0&country=0&year=0
Keeling, J., & Fisher, C. (2015). Health professionals’ responses to women’s disclosure of domestic violence, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 30(13): 2363–2378. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514552449
Kennedy, A. C, Prock, K. A, Adams, A. E, Littwin, A., Meier, E., Saba, J., & Vollinger, L. (2024). Can this provider be trusted? A review of the role of trustworthiness in the provision of community-based services for intimate partner violence survivors, Trauma, Violence, & Abuse 25(2): 982–999. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380231168641
Krogell, J. & Niklander, E. (2023) Lähisuhdeväkivallan ehkäisyn rakenteet vaihtelevat eri puolilla maata – koordinaattoriverkostosta tukea ohjeiden toimeenpanoon. Tutkimuksesta tiiviisti 64/2023. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos, Helsinki. [The structures for the prevention of intimate partner violence vary across the country – A coordinator network to support the implementation of guidelines. Results in brief 64/2023. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare] https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-408-238-9
Liamputtong, P. (2020). Qualitative research methods. 5th ed. Oxford University Press.
Lundberg, L., & Bergmark, Å. (2021). Self-perceived competence and willingness to ask about intimate partner violence among Swedish social workers, European Journal of Social Work 24(2): 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2018.1540970
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. (2019). Combatting domestic and intimate partner violence. https://stm.fi/en/combating-domestic-violence
Niklander, E., Notko, M., & Husso, M. (eds.) (2019). Intervening in domestic violence and training of professionals in social services and health care and the police: Evaluation of the EPRAS project. Report 15/2019, Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare, Finland. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-343-413-4
Nordesjö, K., Ulmestig, R. and Denvall, V. (2022). Coping with tensions between standardization and individualization in social assistance, Nordic Social Work Research 12: 435–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1835696
Notko, M., Husso, M., Piippo, S., Fagerlund M. & Houtsonen, J. (2021). Intervening in domestic violence: Interprofessional collaboration among social and health care professionals and the police, Journal of Interprofessional Care 36(1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2021.1876645
Parada, H., Barnoff, L., & Coleman, B. (2007). Negotiating ‘professional agency’: Social work and decision-making within the Ontario child welfare system, Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 34(4): 35–56. DOI: 10.15453/0191-5096.3293
Piippo, S., Husso, M., Hirvonen, P., Notko, M., & Glumbíková, K. (2021). Institutional and affective practices of domestic violence interventions in social work: Malignant positioning of victims. In: Husso M., Karkulehto S., Saresma T., Laitila A., Eilola J., & Siltala H. (eds) Violence, gender and affect. Palgrave studies in victims and victimology, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-030-56930-3_6
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., Philippou, S., & Robinson, S. (2015). The teacher and the curriculum: exploring teacher agency. In: D. Wyse, L. Hayward & J. Pandya (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Curriculum, Pedagogy and Assessment. Sage.
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/21687
Reed, B. (2001). Epistemic agency and the intellectual virtues, The Southern Journal of Philosophy 39: 507–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.2001.tb01831.x
Siltala, H., Hisasue, T., Hietamäki, J., Saari., J. Laajasalo, T., October, M., Laitinen, H. L., & Raitanen, J. (2023). Domestic violence–related use of services and the resulting costs in health, social and legal services. Prime Minister’s Office Helsinki.
Statistics Finland. (2023). Rikos- ja pakkokeinotilasto [Statistics on offences and coercive measures]. Cases of domestic violence committed by a cohabiting partner reported to the authorities increased by 21.2 per cent in 2022 - Statistics Finland
Tong, A., Sainsbury, P. & Graig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups, International Journal for Quality in Health Care 19(6): 349–357. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
Virkki, T., Husso, M., Notko, M., Holma, J., Laitila, A. & Mäntysaari, M. (2015). Possibilities for intervention in domestic violence: Frame analysis of health care professionals' attitudes, Journal of Social Service Research 41(1): 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2014.917449
Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers' professional identities, Teaching and Teacher Education 47: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.11.006
Vähäsantanen, K., Räikkönen, E., Paloniemi, S., & Hökkä, P. (2022). Acting agentically at work: Developing a short measure of professional agency, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 12(1): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.127869
Wild, J. (2023). Gendered discourses of responsibility and domestic abuse victim-blame in the English children’s social care system, Journal of Family Violence 38: 1391–1403.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at bo.carstens@gmail.com. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.