Promotion of Self-employment: Manager Justifications for Online Labor Platform Operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.149436Keywords:
Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners, Organization & ManagementAbstract
The emergence of online labor platforms (OLPs) has raised concerns about the treatment of platform workers and the legality of OLPs’ contractual relations and control. This study examines how managers (CEOs/founders) justify OLPs’ contractual relations and market control within the frames of critical platform work discussions and the Finnish labor market model. By using justification theory and market control classification as analytical tools, this qualitative study reveals that managers justify OLPs’ control and contractual relations by referring to critical discussions and features of Finnish labor market model. In justifications, managers either adopt the normative features of the model or criticize the societal neglect of self-employed workers. The model’s emphasis on full-time employment and legal questions around the platform economy seems to challenge the legitimacy of all OLP companies on some level. Despite OLPs’ operational differences, all managers justify OLPs with the idea of promoting self-employment within the Finnish
labor market.
Author Biography
Jere Immonen, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
Researcher. E-mail: jere.immonen@ttl.fi
References
Aloisi, A. (2022). Platform work in Europe: Lessons learned, legal developments and challenges ahead. European Labor Law Journal, 13(1): 4–29. Doi: 10.1177/20319525211062557
Bérastégui, P. (2021). Exposure to psychosocial risk factors in the gig economy: A systematic review. Report 2021.01, Brussels, ETUI. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3770016
Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L. (2006). On Justification: Economies of Worth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Boltanski, L., and Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3): 359–377. doi: 10.1177/136843199002003010
Connelly, C. E., Fieseler, C., Černe, M., Giessner, S. R., and Wong, S. I. (2021). Working in the digitized economy: HRM theory & practice. Human Resource Management Review, 31(1): 1 – 7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100762
Council of the EU (2024). Platform workers: Council confirms agreement on new rules to improve their working conditions. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/03/11/platform-workers-council-confirms-agreement-on-new-rules-to-improve-their-working-conditions/pdf/ [Accessed 12 March 2024].
Dencik, L., and Stevens, S. (2023). Regimes of justification in the datafied workplace: The case of hiring. New Media & Society, 25(12): 3657 – 3675. doi: 10.1177/14614448211052893
Dølvik, J. E., and Steen, J. R. (2018). The Nordic Future of Work: Drivers, Institutions, and Politics. Project report from The Future of Work: Opportunities and Challenges for the Nordic Models. TemaNord 2018:555. Nordic Council of Ministers. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. http://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1265618&dswid=-6269 [Accessed: September 20, 2023].
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
European Commission (2022). Antitrust: Commission adopts guidelines on collective agreements by solo self-employed people. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_5796 [Accessed 22 April 2024].
European Commission (2021). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the council on improving working conditions in platform work. European Commission, Brussels. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A762%3AFIN [Accessed: December 11, 2021].
Eurostat (2023). Employment statistics - Digital platform workers. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Employment_statistics_-_digital_platform_workers#Main_concept_and_data_collection [Accessed 24 April 2024].
Finnish Government (2019). Programme of Prime Minister Sanna Marin’s Government 2019 - Inclusive and competent Finland - a socially, economically and ecologically sustainable society. Publications of the Finnish Government 2019:33. https://valtioneuvosto.fi/en/marin/government-programme [Accessed: 20 December 2021].
Frenken, K., Vaskelainen, T., Fünfschilling, L., and Piscicelli, L. (2020). An Institutional Logics Perspective on the Gig Economy. In I. Mayer, J. Mair, and A. Oberg (Eds.), Theorizing the Sharing Economy: Variety and Trajectories of New Forms of Organizing, Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 66: 83-105. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Gumbrell-McCormick, R. (2011). European trade unions and ‘atypical’ workers. Industrial Relations Journal, 42(3): 293–310. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2338.2011.00628.x
Heeks, R. (2017). Decent Work and the Digital Gig Economy: A Developing Country Perspective on Employment Impacts and Standards in Online Outsourcing, Crowdwork, etc. Development Informatics Working Paper no. 71, 2017. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3431033
Hossfeld, H. (2018). Legitimation and institutionalization of managerial practices. The role of organizational rhetoric. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(1): 9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.scaman.2017.11.001
Hotvedt, M. (2018). The contract-of-employment test renewed. A Scandinavian approach to platform work. Spanish Labor Law and Employment Relations Journal, 7(1–2): 56. doi: 10.20318/sllerj.2018.4436
ILO (2021). World Employment and Social Outlook 2021: The Role of Digital OLPs in Transforming the World of Work. ILO flagship report, Geneva. https://www.ilo.org/global/research/global-reports/weso/2021/WCMS_771749/lang--en/index.htm [Accessed 1 December 2021].
Ilsøe, A., and Larsen, T. P. (2023). Why do labor platforms negotiate? Platform strategies in tax-based welfare states. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 44(1): 6-24. doi: 10.1177/0143831X211056974
Immonen, J. (2023). HRM models of online labor platforms: Strategies of market and corporate logics. Frontiers in Sociology, 7. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.980301
Jesnes, K. (2019). Employment models of platform companies in Norway: A distinctive approach? Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 9(S6). doi: 10.18291/njwls.v9is6.114691
Jesnes, K., and Rolandsson, B. (2020). Platforms at work – issues of concern. In: K. Jesnes and S. M. N. Oppegaard (Eds.), Platform Work in the Nordic Models: Issues, Cases, and Responses. The Future of Work: Opportunities and Challenges for the Nordic Models, Nordic Council of Ministers. https://www.norden.org/en/publication/platform-work-nordic-models-issues-cases-and-responses [Accessed 15 April 2021].
Keegan, A., and Meijerink, J. (2021). Online labor platforms, human resource management and platform ecosystem tension: an institutional perspective. In: J. Meijerink, G. Jensen and V. Daskalova (Eds.), Platform Economy Puzzles: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on Gig Work (pp. 140–162). Edward Elgar Publishing. doi: 10.4337/9781839100284
Kettunen, P. (2012). Reinterpreting the historicity of the Nordic Model. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 2(4): 21-43. doi: 10.19154/njwls.v2i4.2303
Krzywdzinski, M., and Gerber, C. (2021). Between automation and gamification: Forms of labor control on crowdwork platforms. Work in the Global Economy, 1(1–2): 161-184. doi: 10.1332/273241721x16295434739161
Kuhn, K. M., and Maleki, A. (2017). Micro-entrepreneurs, dependent contractors, and instaserfs: Understanding online labor platform workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives, 31(3): 183-200. doi: 10.5465/amp.2015.0111
Lippert, I., Kirchner, K., and Wiener, M. (2023). Context Matters: The Use of Algorithmic Management Mechanisms in Platform, Hybrid, and Traditional Work Contexts. Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/103279 [Accessed 22 April 2024].
Lanamäki, A., Väyrynen, K., Laari-Salmela, S., and Kinnula, M. (2020). Examining relational digital transformation through the unfolding of local practices of the Finnish taxi industry. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 29(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101622
Maffie, M. D. (2020). Are we ‘sharing’ or ‘gig‐ing’? A classification system for online platforms. Industrial Relations Journal, 51(6): 536-555. doi: 10.1111/irj.12312
Mateescu, A., and Nguyen, A. (2019). Algorithmic management in the workplace. Data & Society Research Institute. https://datasociety.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/DS_Algorithmic_Management_Explainer.pdf [Accessed 22 April 2024].
Mattila, M. (2020). Platform workers' rights in Finland: Good intentions, too little progress. Peer Country Comments Paper - Finland, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/platform-workers-rights-in-finland-good-intentions-too-little-pro [Accessed 1 December 2021].
Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment of Finland (TEM) (2020). Labor Council takes a position on the legal status of food couriers. Press release. https://tem.fi/en/-/labor-council-takes-a-position-on-the-legal-status-of-food-couriers [Accessed 18 October 2021].
Peticca-Harris, A., deGama, N., and Ravishankar, M. N. (2018). Postcapitalist precarious work and those in the ‘drivers’ seat: Exploring the motivations and lived experiences of Uber drivers in Canada. Organization, 27(1): 36-59. doi: 10.1177/1350508418757332
Pullinen, J. (2021). Valtiovarainministeri Annika Saarikko tarjosi Woltin perustajille maljat: "Ihmiset menestyksen keskellä ymmärtävät, mitä olemme tältä maalta itse kukin saaneet" [The Ministry of Finance Annika Saarikko offered a toast to the founders of Wolt:” People in the midst of success understand what each of us has received from this country”], Helsingin Sanomat. https://www.hs.fi/talous/art-2000008396598.html [Accessed 16 April 2024].
Rasmussen, S., Nätti, J., Larsen, T. P., Ilsøe, A., and Garde, A. H. (2019). Nonstandard employment in the Nordics – Toward precarious work? Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 9(S6). doi: 10.18291/njwls.v9iS6.114689
Salonen, J., Koskinen, L., and Nummi, T. (2020). The risk of under-insurance in the Finnish statutory pension scheme for self-employed workers: A trajectory analysis. International Social Security Review, 73(4): 25–48. doi: 10.1111/issr.12249
Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in. Practice. London: Sage.
Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., and Wengronowitz, R. (2020). Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and Society, 49(5–6): 833–861. doi: 10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y
Schoukens, P. (2020). Digitalisation and social security in the EU. The case of platform work: from work protection to income protection? European Journal of Social Security, 22(4): 434–451. doi: 10.1177/1388262720971300
Schüßler, E., Attwood-Charles, W., Kirchner, S., and Schor, J. B. (2021). Between mutuality, autonomy and domination: rethinking digital platforms as contested relational structures. Socio-Economic Review, 19(4): 1217–1243. doi: 10.1093/ser/mwab038
Statistics Finland (2023). Alustatyötä tekevät edelleen vain harvat [Platform work is still done by only a few]. https://www.stat.fi/uutinen/alustatyota-tekevat-edelleen-vain-harvat [Accessed 24 April 2024].
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571–610. doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Sutela, H., and Pärnänen, A. (2020). Self-Employed Persons in Finland 2017. Statistics Finland. https://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/184211/ytym_201700_2019_21466_net.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 24 April 2024].
Teittinen, P. (2023). Professori ihmettelee Woltin ja Foodoran haluttomuutta puuttua ruokalähettityön epäkohtiin [Professor questions Wolt and Foodora's unwillingness to address problems in food delivery work], Helsingin Sanomat. https://www.hs.fi/kaupunki/art-2000009539698.html [Accessed 16 April 2024].
Vallas, S., and Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46(1): 273-294. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
Wood, A. J. (2021). Algorithmic Management: Consequences for Work Organisation and Working Conditions. JRC Working Papers Series on Labor, Education and Technology 2021/07, European Commission. https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-05/jrc124874.pdf [Accessed 1 December 2021].
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., and Hjorth, I. (2018). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1): 56-75. doi: 10.1177/0950017018785616
YLE News (2021). Wolt set for legal fight over couriers' employment status, YLE. https://yle.fi/a/3-11996619 [Accessed 24 June 2021].
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at bo.carstens@gmail.com. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
