Self-employment and Adaptation to Transformative Digitalization during Later Working Life
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.137865Keywords:
Learning & Competencies, Work/Life BalanceAbstract
In Europe, the self-employed typically have greater career longevity than employees. In Finland, self-employment is becoming more prevalent among older workers. Digitalization complicates the workforce attachment of older workers because of the need to acquire new skills and manage technological interruptions. Few studies have explored how self-employed workers are affected by digitalization. First, this article explores what aspects of transformative digitalization are challenging for the self-employed in particular. Second, it identifies strategies used by the older self-employed to address digitalization-related challenges. The study presents three case studies of self-employed Finns aged over 60. While each participant adopted new digital technologies at work, they spent different amounts of time managing technological interruptions. The study shows that diverse technological requirements of different clients increase the digital complexity at work for the self-employed, and that the self-employed pursue diverse strategies to manage digitalization-related work demands, ranging from avoidance of technology to technological specialization.
Author Biographies
Visa Rantanen, LUT University
Junior Researcher, Department of Social Sciences. E-mail: visa.rantanen@lut.fi
Kathrin Komp-Leukkunen, LUT University
Professor, Department of Social Sciences
References
Alcover, C.M., Guglielmi, D., Depolo, M. and Mazzetti, G. (2021). Aging-and-tech job vulnerability: A proposed framework on the dual impact of aging and AI, robotics, and automation among older workers, Organizational Psychology Review 11(2): 175–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386621992105
Bell, D.N. and Rutherford, A.C. (2013). Older workers and working time, The Journal of the Economics of Ageing 1(2): 28–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2013.08.001
Brynjolfsson, E. and McAffee, A. (2014). The second machine age. New York: W.W. Norton.
Choudhury, M.M. and Harrigan, P. (2014). CRM to social CRM: The integration of new technologies into customer relationship management, Journal of Strategic Marketing 22(2): 149–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2013.876069
Ebbinghaus, B. (2017). The privatization and marketization of pensions in Europe: A double transformation facing the crisis, European Policy Analysis 1(1): 56–73. doi: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.18278/epa.1.1.5
Feldman, D.C. and Beehr, T.A. (2011). A three-phase model of retirement decision making, American Psychologist 66(3): 193–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022153
Fossen, F.M. and Sorgner, A. (2021). Digitalization of work and entry into entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Research 125: 548–563. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.019
Frey, C.B. and Osborne, M.A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 114: 254–280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Halvorsen, C.J. and Morrow-Howell, N. (2017). A conceptual framework on self-employment in later life: Toward a research agenda, Work, Aging and Retirement 3(4): 313–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/waw031
Hensher, D. A., Beck, M. J., and Balbontin, C. (2022). Time allocation of reduced commuting time during COVID-19 under working from home. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 56(4): 399–428. doi: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/lse/jtep/2022/00000056/00000004/art00003
Hershey, D., Van Dalen, H.P., Conen, W. and Henkens, K. (2017). Are ‘voluntary’ self-employed better prepared for retirement than ‘forced’ self-employed? Work, Aging and Retirement 3(3): 243–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/workar/wax008
Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental phenomenology: an introduction. New York: SUNY Press
Jacobs, J.A. and Karen, R. (2019). Technology-driven task replacement and the future of employment. In Vallas, S.P. and Kovalainen, A. (eds.) Work and labour in the digital age. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 43–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320190000033004
Kautonen, T., Hytti, U., Bögenhold, D. and Heinonen, J. (2012). Job satisfaction and retirement intentions in Finland: Self-employed versus salary-earners, International Journal of Manpower 33(4): 424–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01437721211243778
Kompier, M.A., Cooper, C.L. and Sabine, A.E. (2010). A multiple case study approach to work stress prevention in Europe, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9(3): 371–400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200417975
Koskela-Huotari, K., Edvardsson, B., Jonas, J.M., Sörhammar, D. and Witell, L. (2016). Innovation in service ecosystems—breaking, making, and maintaining institutionalized rules of resource integration, Journal of Business Research 69(8): 2964–2971. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.02.029
Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M. and Korunka, C. (2015). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing job demands arising from accelerated change: The intensification of job demands scale (IDS), European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 24(6): 898–913. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.979160
Mallett, O. and Wappshot, R. (2015). Making sense of self-employment in late career: Understanding the identity work of olderpreneurs, Work, Employment and Society 29(2): 250–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014546666
Mauno, S., Minkkinen, J., Tsupari, H., Huhtala, M. and Feldt, T. (2019). Do older employees suffer more from work intensification and other intensified job demands? Evidence from upper white-collar workers, Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 4(1): 3, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.60
Nieto-Mengotti, M., López-Arranz, A. and Novo-Corti, I. (2019). Smart city as a platform economy: Civic engagement and self-employment in focus. In Visvizi, Anna and Lytras, Miltiadis D. (eds.). Smart cities: Issues and challenges: Mapping political, social and economic risks and threats. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 63–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816639-0.00005-3
Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R.K. and Wasilewski, J. (2012). Constellations of new demands concerning careers and jobs: Results from a two-country study on social and economic change, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1): 211–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.002
Platman, K. (2003). The self-designed career in later life: A study of older portfolio workers in the United Kingdom, Aging & Society 23(3): 281–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X03001168
Pöllänen, K. (2021). Organizational culture and masculinities in a startup company in Finland, Nordic Working Life Studies, 11(4): 117–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.126226
Pongratz, H.J. and Voß, G.G. (2003). From employee to ‘entreployee’: Towards a ‘selfentrepreneurial’ work force? Concepts and Transformation 8(3): 239–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/cat.8.3.04pon
Rotolo, T., and Wilson, J. (2006). Employment sector and volunteering: The contribution of nonprofit and public sector workers to the volunteer labor force. The Sociological Quarterly, 47(1): 21–40.
Saari, E., Käpykangas, S. and Hasu, M. (2019). The Cinderella story: Employees reaching for new agency in the digital era. In Toivonen, M. and Saari, E. (eds.) Human-centered digitalization and services. Singapore: Springer, pp. 285–304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_15
Stake, R.E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Tafdrup O.A., Lindsø, A.B. and Hasse, C. (2019). Learning to interpret technological breakdowns: A path to technological literacy. In Toivonen, M. and Saari, E. (eds.) Human-centered digitalization and services. Singapore: Springer, pp. 139–157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_8
Thun, S., Kamsvåg, P.F., Kløve, B., Seim, E.A. and Torvatn, H.Y. (2019). Industry 4.0: Whose revolution? The digitalization of manufacturing work processes, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(4): 39–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v9i4.117777
Toivonen, M. and Kijima, K. (2019). Systems perspective on the interaction between human and technological resources. In Toivonen, M. and Saari, E. (eds.) Human-centered digitalization and services. Singapore: Springer, pp. 37–56. doi: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_3
Vanbelle, E., Van Den Broeck, A. and De Witte, H. (2017). Job crafting: Autonomy and workload as antecedents and the willingness to continue working until retirement age as a positive outcome, Psihologia Resurselor Umane 15(1): 25–41. doi: https://hrp-journal.com/index.php/pru/article/view/56
Verheul, I., Thurik, R., Grilo, I. and Van der Zwan, P. (2012). Explaining preferences and actual involvement in self-employment: Gender and the entrepreneurial personality. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2): 325–341. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.009
Viherä, M. and Viukari, L. (2016). Digitalisaatio mikroyrityksiä voimaannuttamaan [Digitalization empowers micro-enterprises], Futura 16(1): 35–46.
Wainwright, T. and Kibler, E. (2014). Beyond financialization: older entrepreneurship and retirement planning, Journal of Economic Geography 14(4): 849–864. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt023
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Zacher, H., Feldman, D.C. and Schulz, H. (2014). Age, occupational strain, and well-being: a person-environment fit perspective, The Role of Demographics in Occupational Stress and Well-being 12: 83–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-355520140000012002
Zwier, D., Damman, M. and Van den Heuvel, S.G. (2020). Explaining differences in retirement timing preferences between the solo self-employed and employees, International Journal of Manpower 42(2): 286–304. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-01-2019-0038
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at bo.carstens@gmail.com. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
