Meaningfulness in the Work of Language Professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.132333Keywords:
Innovation & Productivity, Identity, Meaning & Culture, Organization & ManagementAbstract
This qualitative study explores the changes that a specific group of knowledge workers – language professionals in Finland – have undergone in their work and how they perceive the meaningfulness of their work as a result. The data presented in this article has been collected through group interviews and is part of a larger data set. To make sense of our data, we use thematic analysis and the framework of meaningful work presented by Rosso et al. For some of our research participants, the factors of meaningful work are present. For others, changes in work, such as platform work and outsourcing, have reduced autonomy and development possibilities. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings.
References
Abdallah, K. & Koskinen, K. (2007). Managing trust: Translating and the network economy. Meta 52 (4), 673–687. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7202/017692ar
Alasoini, T. (2012). Psykologinen sopimus organisaation ja työntekijöiden yhteisenä etuna [Psychological agreement as the mutual interest of the organization and its employees]. In Pyöriä, P. (Ed.) Työhyvinvointi ja organisaation menestys [Well-being at work and organizational success]. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. 99–118.
Alsos, K. & Dølvik, J. E. (2021). Conclusions: Future prospects for the Nordic model. In Alsos, K. & Dølvik, J.E. (Eds.). The future of work in the Nordic countries. Opportunities and challenges for the Nordic working life models, 78-81.Nordic Council of Ministers. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6027/temanord2021-520.
Ali-Yrkkö, J. (2006). Ulkoistus ja toimintojen siirrot Suomesta ulkomaille: Katsaus 2000-luvun alun tilanteesta. [Outsourcing and offshoring from Finland: Overview of the situation at the beginning of the 21st century]. Helsinki: Etla.
Bailey, C., Lips-Wiersma, M., Madden, A., Yeoman, R., Thopson, M. & Chalofsky, N. (2019). The five paradoxes of meaningful work: Introduction to the special issue ‘Meaningful work: prospects for the 21st century’. Journal of Management Studies 53 (3), 481-499.
Batova, T. (2018). Work motivation in the rhetoric of component content management. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 32 (3), 308-346.
Berg, K. (2013) Teachers’ narratives on professional identities and inclusive education. Nordic Studies in Education 33(4). 269–283. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-5949-2013-04-03
Bergman, C., Löve, J., Hultberg, A. & Skagert, K. (2017). Employees‘ conceptions of coworkership in a Swedish Health Care Organization. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 7 (4). 91–107. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v7i4.102359
Blossing U., Imsen G., Moos L. (2014) Schools for All: A Nordic Model. In: Blossing U., Imsen G., Moos L. (eds) The Nordic Education Model. Policy Implications of Research in Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3_13
Breen, K. (2019). Meaningful work and freedom: Self-realization, autonomy, and non-domination in work. In Yeoman, R., Bailey, C., Madden, A. & Thompson, M. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work. (51-72). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bäcklander, G. (2019). To see or not to see. Importance of sensemaking in employee self-direction. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9 (2). Doi: https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v9i2.114799
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2), 77-101.
Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In: APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology. Vol. 2, Research Designs: Quantitative, Qualitative, Neuropsychological, and Biological, 57-71. Hrsg. Cooper, Harris. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Bro-Rasmussen, T. (2021). The Italian conundrum and how technical writing fits in. TCWorld Conference 2021/Tekom Jahrestagung The online event in TC. November 8-19, 2021. 9 November 2021.
CGI. (2019). Tutkimus työn murroksesta Suomessa. [A study on the disruption of work in Finland]. Available: https://www.cgi.com/fi/fi/lataa/tutkimus-tyon-murroksesta-suomessa. [Cited 11 May 2021].
Chesley, N. (2014). Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work, Employment and Society 28(4), 589–610.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. The Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 4 (2017), 19-43. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.
De La Vega, J. C. A., Cecchinato, M. E., Rooksby, J. (2021). “Why lose control?” A study of freelancers’ experiences with gig economy platforms. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’21), May 08–13, 2021, Yokohama, Japan. ACM: New York, NY, USA.
Drucker, P. (1999). Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge. California Management Review 41 (2), 78-94.
Dubinsky, J. M. (2015). Products and processes: transition from “product documentation to … integrated technical content”. Technical Communication 62 (2), 118–133.
Dufva, H. (2011). Ei kysyvä tieltä eksy: kuinka tutkia kielten oppimista ja opettamista haastattelun avulla. [Ask and you shall receive: How to study language learning and teaching through interviews]. In Kalaja, P., Alanen, R. & Dufva, H. (Eds.). Kieltä tutkimassa: tutkielman laatijan opas. [Exploring language: a guide for the thesis writer]. Helsinki: Finn Lectura 2011. 131–145.
Gillberg, G., Kadefors, R., Holmer, J., & Östebo, A. (2021). Meaningfulness and coherence? Experiences among young soldiers in the Swedish armed forces. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 11 (3). Doi: https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.123905.
Glavin, P., Bierman, A. & Schieman, S. (2021). Über-Alienated: Powerless and Alone in the Gig Economy. Work and Occupations, 48 (4), 399-431.
Holford, W. D. (2019). The future of human creative knowledge work within the digital economy. Futures 105 (2019), 143–154.
Hopf, C. (2019). Qualitative interviews. Ein Überblick. In Flick, U., von Kardorff, E. & Steinke (Eds.). Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch. [Qualitative research. A handbook]. Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag. 349–359.
Ipsen, C. & Jensen, P. L. (2012). Organizational options for preventing work-related stress in knowledge work. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 42 (2012), 325–334.
Jacobs, R. L. (2017). Knowledge work and human resource development. Human Resource Development Review 16(2), 176–202.
Junnila, M., Linteri, S. & Fredriksson, S. (2012). Palvelujen ulkoistus. [Outsourcing services]. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. [National Institute for Health and Welfare]. Tampere: Juvenes Print – Tampereen Yliopistopaino Oy.
Järvensivu A. & Piirainen, T. (2012). Hyvän työn ehdot työpaikan arjessa. [The conditions for good work in the workplace]. In Pyöriä, P. (Ed.) Työhyvinvointi ja organisaation menestys [Well-being at work and organizational success]. Gaudeamus, Helsinki. 80–98.
Karimikia, H., Singh, H., Joseph, D. (2021). Negative outcomes of ICT use at work: meta-analytic evidence and the role of job autonomy. Internet Research 31 (1), 159–190.
Keyriläinen, M. & Sutela, H. (2018). Suomalaisten palkansaajien kokemuksia työn digitalisaatiosta. [Finnish employees' experiences of digitalization of work]. Työelämän tutkimus - Arbetslivsforskning [Worklife Research] 16 (4), 275–288.
Kujamäki, M. (2021). Translation as a professional service: An overview of a fragmented field of practice. Perspectives, Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2021.1981412.
Kurlin, A., Suorsa, O., & Carver, E. (2018). Yliopistojen maisteri- ja tohtoriuraseurantakyselyiden 2017 tulokset. [Results of the 2017 University Master's and Doctoral Follow-up Surveys]. Aarresaari: Yliopistojen työelämä- ja urapalveluiden verkosto. [Aarresaari: University network for work life and career services]. Available: https://www.aarresaari.net/uraseuranta/maistereiden_uraseuranta. [Cited 15 November 2021].
Laaser, K. & Karlsson, J. (2021). Towards a sociology of meaningful work. Work, Employment and Society (X) X, 1-18.
Larsson, P. & Löwstedt, J. (2021). Förändrar skolans styrning och ledning arbetsmiljön? - Krav, inflytande och stöd i över- och underpresterande skolor. [Does school governance and management change the work environment? - Demands, influence and support in over- and underperforming schools]. Arbetsmarknad & Arbetsliv [Labour Market and Working Life] 27(2). 7–26.
Lepisto, D.A. & Pratt, M. G. (2017). Meaningful work as realization and justification: Toward a dual conceptualization. Organizational Psychology Review 7 (2), 99–121.
Lips-Wiersma, M. and Wright, S. (2012). ‘Measuring the meaning of meaningful work: development and validation of the Comprehensive Meaningful Work Scale (CMWS)’. Group and Organization Management 37, 665–85.
Luukka, P. (2019). Yrityskulttuuri on kuningas: mikä, miksi, miten? [Business culture is king: what, why, how?]. Helsinki: Alma Talent.
Lysova, E. I., Allan, B. A., Dik, B. J, Duffy, R. D., & Steger, M. F. (2019). Fostering meaningful work in organizations: A multi-level review and integration. Journal of Vocational Behavior 110 (B), 374-389.
Martela, F., Gomez, M., Unanue, W., Araya, S., Bravo, D., & Espejo, A. (2021). What makes work meaningful? Longitudinal evidence for the importance of autonomy and beneficence for meaningful work. Journal of Vocational Behavior 131 (2021), 1-15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103631.
Moorkens, J. (2020). "A tiny cog in a large machine": Digital Taylorism in the translation industry. Translation Spaces 9 (1), 12–14.
Mubaraz, S. (2021). Aligning outsourcing relationships: A resource portfolio approach. Doctoral Dissertation. University of Oulu Graduate School. Oulu: University of Oulu.
Nyckel, E.-M. (2020). "Digital Taylorism"? Data practices and governance in the enterprise software Salesforce. Weizenbaum Series, 9. Berlin: Weizenbaum Institute for the Networked Society - The German Internet Institute.
Oziemblewska, M. & Szarkowska, A. (2020). The quality of templates in subtitling. A survey on current market practices and changing subtitler competences. Perspectives, Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. Doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2020.1791919.
Pietilä, I. (2017). Ryhmäkeskustelu. [Group interview]. In Hyvärinen, M., Nikander, P. & Ruusuvuori, J. (Eds.). Tutkimushaastattelun käsikirja. [The research interview handbook]. Tampere: Vastapaino. 88–105.
Puusa, A. (2020). Haastattelutyypit ja niiden metodiset ominaisuudet. [Interview types and their methodological characteristics]. In Puusa, A. & Juuti, P. (Eds.). Laadullisen tutkimuksen näkökulmat ja menetelmät. [Perspectives and methods of qualitative research]. Tallinna: Gaudeamus. 103–117.
Pyöriä, P. (2005). The concept of knowledge work revisited. Journal of Knowledge Management 9 (3), 116-127.
Pyöriä, P. & Ojala, S. (2017). Työn prekarisaatio. [The precarisation of work]. In Pyöriä, P. (Ed.), Työelämän myytit ja todellisuus, [The myths and reality of working life] 42–62. Helsinki: University Press.
Raeder, S., Bamberger, S. G., Nielsen, P., Nielsen, R. N., Larsen, A., Vinding, A. L., Fonager, K., Ryom, P., Omland, O. (2019). Globalisation and job insecurity in Danish firms: A multilevel study. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9 (4), 59-80.
Rolandsson, B., Saloniemi, A. & Saari, T. (2019). Platform work performed by a qualified work force - the case of technical translators. Nordic Future of Work Brief 10, October 2019. https://fafo.no/images/pub/2019/Nfow-brief10.pdf [Cited 15 November 201].
Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H. & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior 30, 91-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001.
Selkälä, S., Tahkokorpi, J. & Virtaluoto, J. (2018). Sirpaleita ja muutosta vai eheyttä ja vakautta? Filologien työelämäpolkuja. [Fragmentation and change or integrity and stability? Philologists’ career paths]. In Kääntä, Liisa; Enell-Nilsson, Mona; Keng, Nicole. (Eds.) Työelämän viestintä, Arbetslivskommunikation, Workplace Communication, Kommunication im Berufsleben. VAKKI Symposium XXXVIII. Vaasa 8.-9.2.2018. (pp. 119-131). VAKKI Publications 9. Vaasa: University of Vaasa.
Selkälä, S. & Virtaluoto, J. (2020). Vor-und Nachteile der Digitalisierung bei der Arbeit von Sprachexpertinnen und –experten. [Advantages and disadvantages of digitization in the work of language experts]. In Hirsto, Heidi; Enell-Nilsson, Mona; Kauppinen-Räisänen, Hannele; Keng, Nicole (Eds.). Työelämän viestintä III, Arbetslivskommunikation III, Workplace Communication III, Kommunikation im Berufsleben III. VAKKI-symposiumi XL. Vaasa 6. – 7.2.2020 (pp. 224-237). VAKKI Publications 12. Vaasa: University of Vaasa.
Seppänen, L., Spinuzzi, C., Poutanen, S., Alasoini, T. (2021). Co-creation in macrotask knowledge work on online labor platforms. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 11 (2). Doi: https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.123166.
Slattery, S. (2007). Undistributing work through writing: how technical writers manage texts in complex information environments. Technical Communication Quarterly 16 (3), 311–325.
Strimling, Y. (2019). Beyond accuracy: What documentation quality means to readers. Technical Communication 66 (1), 7–29.
Spilka, R. (2002). Becoming a profession. In B. Mirel & R. Spilka (Eds.), Reshaping technical communication: New directions and challenges for the 21st century (pp. 97–109). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sutela, H., Pärnänen, A., & Keyriläinen, M. (2019). Digiajan työelämä - työolotutkimuksen tuloksia 1977–2018. [Working life in the digital age - results of the Working Conditions Survey 1977-2018]. Helsinki: Tilastokeskus. [Statistics Finland].
Sutela, H. (2021). Tilastot ja tarina suomalaisista työoloista - paranemista vai eriytymistä? [Statistics and the story of Finnish working conditions - improvement or divergence?]. In Helin, T., Heiskanen, L., & Jonker-Hoffrén P. (Eds.) Työelämän tutkimuspäivät 2020. Työelämän uusi normaali? Työelämän tutkimuskeskus. Työelämän tutkimuspäivien konferenssijulkaisuja 8/2021 [Work Life Research Days 2020. The new normal in working life? Centre for the Study of Work Life. Work Life Research Days conference proceedings], 24–32.
Telhaug, A. O., Mediås, O. A. & Aasen, P. (2006). The Nordic Model in Education: Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50:3, 245-283, DOI: 10.1080/00313830600743274
Vallas, S. P., Finlay, W., Wharton, A. S. (2009). The Sociology of Work: Structures and Inequalities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Valtonen, A. (2005). Ryhmäkeskustelut - millainen metodi? [Group interviews – what kind of method?] In Ruusuvuori, J. & Tiittula, L. (Eds.) Haastattelu: tutkimus, tilanteet ja vuorovaikutus. [Interviews: research, situations, and interaction]. Tampere: Vastapaino, 223–241.
Vallas, S. P. & Christin, A. (2018). Work and identity in an era of precarious employment: How workers respond to ‘‘personal branding’’ discourse. Work and Occupations 45 (1), 3–37.
Vinas-Bardolet, C., Torrent-Sellens, J. & Guillen-Royo, M. (2020). Knowledge workers and job satisfaction: Evidence from Europe. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 11 (2021), 256-280.
Wall, E. (2020). The Invisible Civil Servant: How Female Senior Lecturers in Sweden Narrate Work. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 10(4). 85–101. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.122194
Wheatley, D. (2017). Autonomy in paid work and employee subjective well-being. Work and Occupations 44 (3). 296-328.
Wilson, G. (2001). Technical communication and late capitalism: Considering a postmodern technical communication pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 15(1), 72-99.
Virtaluoto, J. (2015). Technical communication as an activity system: a practitioner’s perspective. Doctoral Dissertation. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. Series B, Humaniora 130. Oulu: University of Oulu. Available: http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:9789526209371.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at bo.carstens@gmail.com. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.