Cohort Differences in Swedish Union Membership 1956–2019 and the Role of Individualization
Keywords:Identity, Meaning & Culture, Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners
Discussions of the role of cohort differences have long been part of academic research on union membership, with a central hypothesis being that the general decline in unionization is caused by changes toward more individualistic values in the younger generations. However, the short time span of most studies makes it uncertain if they can separate cohort effects from age effects. Using survey data going back to 1956, we test the individualization hypothesis. Our main result is that later Swedish cohorts are indeed less prone to join unions. In particular, the differences between cohorts born before and after ca 1970 are striking. We also provide evidence that the erosion in union membership in Sweden is not related to changes toward more individualistic values in later cohorts, or even to more negative views of unions per se.
Beck, U. (1994). The debate on the individualization theory in today’s sociology in Germany, Soziologie – Journal of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie, Special Edition 3:191–200.
Blanchflower, D. G. (2007). International patterns of union membership, British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00600.x
Blanchflower, D. G. & Bryson, A. (2021) Union membership peaks in midlife, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Early view. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12606
Bryson, A., Gomez, R., Gunderson, M., & Meltz, N. (2005). Youth-adult differences in the demand for unionization: Are American, British, and Canadian workers all that different? Journal of Labor Research 26(1): 155–167.
Budd, J. W. (2010). When do US workers first experience unionization? Implications for revitalizing the labor movement, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 49(2): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2009.00596.x
Böckerman, P., & Uusitalo, R. (2006). Erosion of the Ghent system and union membership decline: Lessons from Finland, British Journal of Industrial Relations 44(2): 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00498.x
Ebbinghaus, B., Göbel, C., & Koos, S. (2011). Social capital,‘Ghent’and workplace contexts matter: Comparing union membership in Europe, European Journal of Industrial Relations 17(2): 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680111400894
Falk, E. (2019). Den nationella SOM-undersökningen 2019 [The national SOM survey 2019], 465–473 in Andersson, U., Carlander, A. & Öhberg, P. (eds) Regntunga skyar [Rainy clouds]. SOM Anthology 76. SOM Institute: University of Gothenburg.
Gomez, R., Gunderson, M., & Meltz, N. (2002). Comparing youth and adult desire for unionization in Canada, British Journal of Industrial Relations 40(3): 542–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00245
Høgedahl, L., & Kongshøj, K. (2017). New trajectories of unionization in the Nordic Ghent countries: Changing labor market and welfare institutions, European Journal of Industrial Relations 23(4): 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680116687666
Jensen, C. S. (2017). Political attitudes and trade union membership in the Nordic countries, European Journal of Industrial Relations 23(4): 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680117708372
Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kilburn, H. W. (2009). Personal values and public opinion, Social Science Quarterly 90(4): 868–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00667.x
Kirmanoğlu, H., & Başlevent, C. (2012). Using basic personal values to test theories of union membership, Socio-Economic Review 10(4): 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr020
Kjellberg, A. (2021). Den svenska modellen 2020: pandemi och nytt huvudavtal [The Swedish Model 2020: Pandemic and a New Main Agreement]. Arena Idé.
Kjellberg, A. (2020). Den svenska modellen i en oviss tid: Fack, arbetsgivare och kollektivavtal på en föränderlig arbetsmarknad. [The Swedish Model in an Uncertain Time: Trade Unions, Employers and Collective Agreements in a Changing Labor Market]. Arena Idé.
Kjellberg, A. (2019a). Sweden: Collective bargaining under the industry norm. In T. Müller, K. Vandaele, & J. Waddington (eds), Collective bargaining in Europe: Towards an endgame (Vol. 3, pp. 583–603). ETUI (EuropeanTrade Union Institute), Bruxelles.
Kjellberg, A. (2019b). Kollektivavtalens täckningsgrad samt organisationsgraden hos arbetsgivarförbund och fackförbund [The degree of collective bargaining coverage and the level of organization of employer associations and trade unions]. Studies in Social Policy, Industrial Relations, Working Life and Mobility 2018(1). Department of Sociology: Lund University.
Markstedt, E. (2014). Representativitet och viktning – Riks-SOM som spegel av det svenska samhället 1986-2013 [Representativeness and weighting - Riks-SOM as a mirror of Swedish society 1986-2013]. SOM Report 2014:10. SOM Institute: University of Gothenburg.
Oleskog Tryggvason, P., & Hedberg, P. (2015). Swedish national election studies program method report: Super election edition. Swedish National Election Studies Working paper series 2015, 1.
Palm, J. (2017). There is power in a union: Trade union organization, union membership and union activity in Sweden (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stockholm University).
Rasmussen, M. & Pontusson J. (2018). Working-class strength by institutional design? Unionization, partisan politics, and unemployment insurance systems, 1870 to 2010, Comparative Political Studies 51(6): 793–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710269
Schnabel, C. (2013). Union membership and density: Some (not so) stylized facts and challenges, European Journal of Industrial Relations 19(3): 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680113493373
Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2007). Union density and determinants of union membership in 18 EU countries: Evidence from micro data, 2002/03 1, Industrial Relations Journal 38(1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2007.00433.x
Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2008). The aging of the unions in West Germany, 1980–2006, Working Paper Series in Economics, No. 93, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Lüneburg. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/28211
Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2012). With or without U? Testing the hypothesis of an inverted U-shaped union membership-age relationship, Contemporary Economics 6(4): 28–34.
Statistics Sweden (2015) Background facts 2015: 4, Patterns of non-response in the Swedish LFS.
Visser, J. (2002). Why fewer workers join unions in Europe: A social custom explanation of membership trends, British Journal of Industrial Relations 40(3): 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00241
Visser, J. (2019). Trade unions in the balance, Geneva: International Labor Organization's Bureau for Workers' Activities (ACTRAV).
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. This Journal gives Open Access with CreativeCommons license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
You can download all the content of the Journal and share it with others as long as you credit the authors and the journal, but you can’t change it in any way or use it commercially.
More specifically this license means that you – authors and users – may:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form as long as you follow the license terms. The freedom to share includes parallel publishing on authors’ own website and in institutional repositories or in ResearchGate after publication in NJWLS, or if you want to reprint your article as part of publication of a PhD-thesis or a dissertation
You may share under these terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit and provide a link to the license. Appropriate credit implies that you provide the name of the creator and attribution parties, a copyright notice, a license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material. The link used should be its DOI.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. A commercial use is one primarily intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. Merely changing the format never creates a derivative.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at firstname.lastname@example.org. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.