Cohort Differences in Swedish Union Membership 1956–2019 and the Role of Individualization

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.129503

Keywords:

Identity, Meaning & Culture, Labor Market Institutions & Social Partners

Abstract

Discussions of the role of cohort differences have long been part of academic research on union membership, with a central hypothesis being that the general decline in unionization is caused by changes toward more individualistic values in the younger generations. However, the short time span of most studies makes it uncertain if they can separate cohort effects from age effects. Using survey data going back to 1956, we test the individualization hypothesis. Our main result is that later Swedish cohorts are indeed less prone to join unions. In particular, the differences between cohorts born before and after ca 1970 are striking. We also provide evidence that the erosion in union membership in Sweden is not related to changes toward more individualistic values in later cohorts, or even to more negative views of unions per se.

Author Biographies

Erik Vestin

Independent researcher. E-mail: estin.erik@gmail.com

Patrik Vulkan, University of Gothenburg

Senior Lecturer, Department of Sociology and Work Science

References

Beck, U. (1994). The debate on the individualization theory in today’s sociology in Germany, Soziologie – Journal of the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie, Special Edition 3:191–200.

Blanchflower, D. G. (2007). International patterns of union membership, British Journal of Industrial Relations 45(1): 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2007.00600.x

Blanchflower, D. G. & Bryson, A. (2021) Union membership peaks in midlife, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Early view. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12606

Bryson, A., Gomez, R., Gunderson, M., & Meltz, N. (2005). Youth-adult differences in the demand for unionization: Are American, British, and Canadian workers all that different? Journal of Labor Research 26(1): 155–167.

Budd, J. W. (2010). When do US workers first experience unionization? Implications for revitalizing the labor movement, Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 49(2): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2009.00596.x

Böckerman, P., & Uusitalo, R. (2006). Erosion of the Ghent system and union membership decline: Lessons from Finland, British Journal of Industrial Relations 44(2): 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2006.00498.x

Ebbinghaus, B., Göbel, C., & Koos, S. (2011). Social capital,‘Ghent’and workplace contexts matter: Comparing union membership in Europe, European Journal of Industrial Relations 17(2): 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680111400894

Falk, E. (2019). Den nationella SOM-undersökningen 2019 [The national SOM survey 2019], 465–473 in Andersson, U., Carlander, A. & Öhberg, P. (eds) Regntunga skyar [Rainy clouds]. SOM Anthology 76. SOM Institute: University of Gothenburg.

Gomez, R., Gunderson, M., & Meltz, N. (2002). Comparing youth and adult desire for unionization in Canada, British Journal of Industrial Relations 40(3): 542–519. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00245

Høgedahl, L., & Kongshøj, K. (2017). New trajectories of unionization in the Nordic Ghent countries: Changing labor market and welfare institutions, European Journal of Industrial Relations 23(4): 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680116687666

Jensen, C. S. (2017). Political attitudes and trade union membership in the Nordic countries, European Journal of Industrial Relations 23(4): 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680117708372

Inglehart, R. (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Kilburn, H. W. (2009). Personal values and public opinion, Social Science Quarterly 90(4): 868–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00667.x

Kirmanoğlu, H., & Başlevent, C. (2012). Using basic personal values to test theories of union membership, Socio-Economic Review 10(4): 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr020

Kjellberg, A. (2021). Den svenska modellen 2020: pandemi och nytt huvudavtal [The Swedish Model 2020: Pandemic and a New Main Agreement]. Arena Idé.

Kjellberg, A. (2020). Den svenska modellen i en oviss tid: Fack, arbetsgivare och kollektivavtal på en föränderlig arbetsmarknad. [The Swedish Model in an Uncertain Time: Trade Unions, Employers and Collective Agreements in a Changing Labor Market]. Arena Idé.

Kjellberg, A. (2019a). Sweden: Collective bargaining under the industry norm. In T. Müller, K. Vandaele, & J. Waddington (eds), Collective bargaining in Europe: Towards an endgame (Vol. 3, pp. 583–603). ETUI (EuropeanTrade Union Institute), Bruxelles.

Kjellberg, A. (2019b). Kollektivavtalens täckningsgrad samt organisationsgraden hos arbetsgivarförbund och fackförbund [The degree of collective bargaining coverage and the level of organization of employer associations and trade unions]. Studies in Social Policy, Industrial Relations, Working Life and Mobility 2018(1). Department of Sociology: Lund University.

Markstedt, E. (2014). Representativitet och viktning – Riks-SOM som spegel av det svenska samhället 1986-2013 [Representativeness and weighting - Riks-SOM as a mirror of Swedish society 1986-2013]. SOM Report 2014:10. SOM Institute: University of Gothenburg.

Oleskog Tryggvason, P., & Hedberg, P. (2015). Swedish national election studies program method report: Super election edition. Swedish National Election Studies Working paper series 2015, 1.

Palm, J. (2017). There is power in a union: Trade union organization, union membership and union activity in Sweden (Doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, Stockholm University).

Rasmussen, M. & Pontusson J. (2018). Working-class strength by institutional design? Unionization, partisan politics, and unemployment insurance systems, 1870 to 2010, Comparative Political Studies 51(6): 793–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710269

Schnabel, C. (2013). Union membership and density: Some (not so) stylized facts and challenges, European Journal of Industrial Relations 19(3): 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959680113493373

Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2007). Union density and determinants of union membership in 18 EU countries: Evidence from micro data, 2002/03 1, Industrial Relations Journal 38(1): 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2007.00433.x

Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2008). The aging of the unions in West Germany, 1980–2006, Working Paper Series in Economics, No. 93, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, Institut für Volkswirtschaftslehre, Lüneburg. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/28211

Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2012). With or without U? Testing the hypothesis of an inverted U-shaped union membership-age relationship, Contemporary Economics 6(4): 28–34.

Statistics Sweden (2015) Background facts 2015: 4, Patterns of non-response in the Swedish LFS.

Visser, J. (2002). Why fewer workers join unions in Europe: A social custom explanation of membership trends, British Journal of Industrial Relations 40(3): 403–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8543.00241

Visser, J. (2019). Trade unions in the balance, Geneva: International Labor Organization's Bureau for Workers' Activities (ACTRAV).

Downloads

Published

2021-12-01

How to Cite

Vestin, E., & Vulkan, P. (2021). Cohort Differences in Swedish Union Membership 1956–2019 and the Role of Individualization. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.129503

Issue

Section

Articles