Gendered Experiences of Appearance-related Perks and Penalties in Finnish Labor Markets
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.128715Keywords:
Employment, Wages, Unemployment & Rehabilitation, Gender, Ethnicity, Age and DiversityAbstract
Physical appearance is generally associated with considerable labor-market sanctions, and appearances are thought to be of particular importance in the feminine service sector. However, little is known about workers’ experiences of appearance-based perks and penalties in Nordic labor markets. Drawing on literature on aesthetic capital and labor, this study aims to fill this research gap. The study uses a nationally representative survey (N = 1600) fielded in Finland and multinomial regression to determine whether subjective experiences of appearance-related perks and penalties are gendered, dependent on the field of work or daily work on appearances. Our main finding is that while both men and women experience looks-based perks and penalties, men are more likely to have experienced appearance having a say in salary negotiations. Our results shed light on the gendered logics of aesthetic capital and labor, and question economic understandings of beauty work as a pathway to labor market success for women
References
Adamson, M., & Salmenniemi, S. (2017). ‘The bottom line is that the problem is you’: aesthetic labour, postfeminism and subjectivity in Russian self-help literature. In: Elias, A. S., Gill, R. & Scharff, C. (eds.) Aesthetic Labour, 301–316. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Anderson, T.L., Grunert, C., Katz, A. & Lovascio, S. (2010). Aesthetic capital: A research review on beauty perks and penalties, Sociology Compass 4(8): 564–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00312.x
Berggren, N., Jordahl, H. & Poutvaara, P. (2017). The right look: Conservative politicians look better and voters reward it, Journal of Public Economics 146: 79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.12.008
Berry, B. (2008). The Power of Looks: Social Stratification of Physical Appearance, Routledge.
Bolsø, A. & Mühleisen, W. (2017). Representations of women dressed for power. In: Bolsø, A., Svendsen, S. & Sørensen, S. (eds.) Bodies, Symbols and Organizational Practice, 12–33. Abigdon: Routledge.
Borchorst, A. & Siim, B. (2002). The women-friendly welfare states revisited, NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies 10(2): 90–98. doi: 10.1080/080387402760262186
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In: Richardson, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, 241–258, Greenwood.
Boyle, B. & De Keere, K. (2019). Aesthetic labour, class and taste: Mobility aspirations of middle-class women working in luxury-retail, The Sociological Review 67(3): 706–722. doi: 10.1177/0038026119827753
Dahl, D.B. (2013). Looking neat on the street. Aesthetic labor in public parking patrol, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 3(2): 59–78.
Crane, D. & Bovone, L. (2006). Approaches to material culture: The sociology of fashion and clothing, Poetics 34(6): 319–333. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2006.10.002
Das, J. & De Loach, S.B. (2011). Mirror, mirror on the wall: The effect of time spent grooming on earnings, The Journal of Socio-Economics 40(1): 26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.005
Edmonds, A. & Mears, A. (2017). Managing body capital in fields of labor, sex, and health. In: Anderson-Fye, E., Brewis Slade (eds.) Fat Planet. Santa Fe: SAR Press.
Ehn, B. & Löfgren, O. (2009). Routines-made and unmade. In: Shove, E., Trentmann, F & Wilk, R. (eds.) Time, Consumption and Everyday Life. Practice, Materiality and Culture, 99–112. Oxford: Berg.
Elias, A., Gill, R. & Scharff, C. (2017). Aesthetic labour: Beauty politics in neoliberalism. In: Elias, A. S., Gill, R. & Scharff, C. (eds.) Aesthetic Labour, 3–49. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Entwistle, J. & Wissinger, E. (2006). Keeping up appearances: aesthetic labour in the fashion modelling industries of London and New York, The Sociological Review 54(4): 774–794. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00671.x
Eurobarometer (2019). Discrimination in the European Union 2019, Special Eurobarometer 493, European Commission.
Gill, R. (2017). The affective, cultural and psychic life of postfeminism: A postfeminist sensibility 10 years on, European Journal of Cultural Studies 20(6): 606–626. doi: 10.1177/1367549417733003
Green, A.I. (2014). The sexual fields framework. In: Green, A.I. (ed.) Sexual fields: Toward a sociology of collective sexual life, 25–56. University of Chicago Press.
Grönlund, A., Halldén, K. & Magnusson, C. (2017). A Scandinavian success story? Women’s labour market outcomes in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, Acta Sociologica 60(2): 97–119. doi: 10.1177/0001699316660595
Hamermesh, D.S., Meng, X. & Zhang, J. (2002). Dress for success—does primping pay?, Labour Economics 9(3): 361–373. doi: 10.1016/S0927-5371(02)00014-3
Hamermesh, D.S. (2011). Beauty Pays. Why Attractive People are more Successful, Princeton University Press.
Hernes, H.M. (1987). Welfare State and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism, A Scandinavian University Press Publication.
Hochschild, A.R. & Machung, A. (2012). The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home, Penguin.
Holla, S. & Kuipers, G. (2015). Aesthetic capital. In: Hanquinet, L. & Savage, M. (eds) Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture, 290–304, London: Routledge.
Hosoda, M., Stone‐Romero, E. F. & Coats, G. (2003). The effects of physical attractiveness on job‐related outcomes: A meta‐analysis of experimental studies, Personnel Psychology 56(2): 431–462. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00157.x
Hracs, B.J. & Leslie, D. (2014). Aesthetic labour in creative industries: the case of independent musicians in Toronto, Canada, Area 46(1): 66–73.
Huzell, H. & Larsson, P. (2012). Aesthetic and athletic employees: The negative outcome of employers assuming responsibility for sickness benefits, Economic and Industrial Democracy 33(1): 103–123. doi: 10.1177/0143831X11427590
Härkönen, J., Räsänen, P. & Näsi, M. (2011). Obesity, unemployment, and earnings, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 1(2): 23–38. doi: 10.19154/njwls.v1i2.2343
Kinnunen, T. & Parviainen, J. (2016). Rekrytointikonsulttien tuntuma “hyvästä tyypistä” [Recruitment consultants’ feel of a “good fellow”]. In: Parviainen, J., Kinnunen, T. & Kortelainen, I. (eds.) Ruumiillisuus ja työelämä: Työruumis jälkiteollisessa taloudessa [Embodiment and working life: The working body in the postindustrial economy], 59–75, Tampere: Vastapaino.
Koivula, A., Räsänen, P., & Sarpila, O. (2016). Internet- ja paperilomakkeiden täyttäjät: vastaustavan muutoksen ja merkityksen arviointia hyvinvointitutkimuksessa [Web and survey respondents: response mode effects in wellbeing research]. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka [Public policy] 81(2), 54–65.
Kuipers, G. (2015). Beauty and distinction? The evaluation of appearance and cultural capital in five European countries, Poetics 53: 38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.10.001
Kukkonen, I., Åberg, E., Sarpila, O. & Pajunen, T. (2018). Exploitation of aesthetic capital–disapproved by whom? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 38(3/4), 312–328.
Kukkonen, I. (2019) Aikaa, jonka voisi käyttää myös paremmin? Feministisiä näkökulmia kauneuskäytänteisiin. [Time that might also have better use? Feminist approaches to beauty practices.] In: Kukkonen, I., Pajunen, T., Sarpila, O. & Åberg, E. (eds.) Ulkonäköyhteiskunta: Ulkoinen olemus pääomana 2000-luvun Suomessa [Appearance society: Physical appearance as a form of capital in 21st century Finland], 123–136, Helsinki: Into Kustannus Oy.
Laustsen, L. (2014). Decomposing the relationship between candidates’ facial appearance and electoral success, Political Behavior 36(4): 777–791. doi: 10.1007/s11109-013-9253-1
Lister, R. (2009). A Nordic nirvana? Gender, citizenship, and social justice in the Nordic welfare states, Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 16(2): 242–278. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxp007
Long, J.S. & Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for Categorical Variables using Stata (3rd ed), Texas: Stata Press.
Luna, J.K. (2019). The ease of hard work: embodied neoliberalism among Rocky Mountain fun runners, Qualitative Sociology 42(2): 251–271. doi: 10.1007/s11133-019-9412-8
Maestripieri, D., Henry, A. & Nickels, N. (2017). Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000340
Martin, J.L. & George, M. (2006). Theories of sexual stratification: Toward an analytics of the sexual field and a theory of sexual capital, Sociological Theory 24(2): 107–132. doi: 10.1111/j.0735-2751.2006.00284.x
McCabe, M., de Waal Malefyt, T. & Fabri, A. (2017). Women, makeup, and authenticity: Negotiating embodiment and discourses of beauty, Journal of Consumer Culture. doi: 10.1177/1469540517736558
McDowell, L. (2009). Working Bodies: Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities, John Wiley & Sons.
McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change, London: Sage.
Mears, A. (2014). Aesthetic labor for the sociologies of work, gender, and beauty, Sociology Compass 8(12): 1330–1343. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12211
Mears, A. (2015a). Working for free in the VIP: Relational work and the production of consent, American Sociological Review 80(6): 1099–1122. doi: 10.1177/0003122415609730
Mears, A. (2015b). Girls as elite distinction: The appropriation of bodily capital, Poetics 53: 22–37. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.08.004
Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J. & Valtonen, A. (2015). Headhunters and the ‘ideal’ executive body, Organization 22(1), 3–22. doi: 10.1177/1350508413496578
Neumann, C.B. (2017). A dangerous subject: the fashion model and the beauty/narcissism double bind, Hypatia 32(2), 380–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12319
Oesch, D. (2006). Coming to grips with a changing class structure: An analysis of employment stratification in Britain, Germany, Sweden and Switzerland, International Sociology 21(2): 263–288. doi: 10.1177/0268580906061379
Oesch, D. (2020). Scripts for Social Class. Available at: https://people.unil.ch/danieloesch/scripts/ [Accessed 14 January, 2020]
Pajunen, T., Kukkonen, I. & Sarpila, O. (2019). Normit ihon alla: Kokemuksia ulkonäköpaineista [Norms beneath the skin: Experiences of appearance-related pressures]. In: Kukkonen, I., Pajunen, T., Sarpila, O. & Åberg, E. (eds.) Ulkonäköyhteiskunta: Ulkoinen olemus pääomana 2000-luvun Suomessa [Appearance society: Physical appearance as a form of capital in 21st century Finland], 157–171, Helsinki: Into Kustannus Oy.
Pettinger, L. (2004). Brand culture and branded workers: Service work and aesthetic labour in fashion retail, Consumption Markets & Culture 7(2): 165–184. doi: 10.1080/1025386042000246214
Pettinger, L. (2008). Developing aesthetic labour: The importance of consumption, International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 2(4): 327–343. doi: 10.1504/IJWOE.2008.022495
Robins, P.K., Homer, J.F. & French, M.T. (2011). Beauty and the labor market: Accounting for the additional effects of personality and grooming, Labour 25(2): 228–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9914.2010.00511.x
Rooth, D.O. (2009). Obesity, attractiveness, and differential treatment in hiring a field experiment, Journal of Human Resources, 44(3): 710–735. doi: 10.3368/jhr.44.3.710
Sarpila, O. & Åberg, E. (2019). Ulkonäkökulutuksella kohti parempaa minää ja elämää? [Towards a better me and a better life by means of appearance-related consumption?]. In: Kukkonen, I., Pajunen, T., Sarpila, O. & Åberg, E. (eds.) Ulkonäköyhteiskunta: Ulkoinen olemus pääomana 2000-luvun Suomessa [Appearance society: Physical appearance as a form of capital in 21st century Finland], 103–118, Helsinki: Into Kustannus Oy.
Sarpila, O., Sandell, R., Koivula, A. & Kukkonen, I. (2016). Arkielämä ja ulkonäkö -kyselyn tutkimusseloste [Research report on the Physical appearance and everyday life -survey]. Working papers in Economic Sociology, University of Turku. Available online at: https://www.utu.fi/sites/default/files/public%3A//media/file/Arkiel%C3%A4m%C3%A4_ja_ulkon%C3%A4k%C3%B6_kyselyn_tutkimusseloste.pdf [Accessed 12 October 2020].
Sarpila, O., Pajunen, T., Kekäläinen, S. & Åberg, E. (2017). Onko ulkonäön arvostus nousussa Suomessa? [Is the valuation of physical appearance increasing in Finland?], Yhteiskuntapolitiikka [Public policy] 82(1): 86–93.
Sarpila, O., Koivula, A., Kukkonen, I., Åberg, E. & Pajunen, T. (2020). Double standards in the accumulation and utilisation of ‘aesthetic capital’. Poetics. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2020.101447
Siim, B. & Skjeie, H. (2008). Tracks, intersections and dead ends: Multicultural challenges to state feminism in Denmark and Norway, Ethnicities 8(3): 322–344. doi: 10.1177/1468796808092446
Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self, Culture, London: Routledge.
Swedberg, R. (2003). Principles of Economic Sociology, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
van den Berg, M. & Arts, J. (2019). The aesthetics of work-readiness: Aesthetic judgements and pedagogies for conditional welfare and post-Fordist labour markets, Work, Employment and Society 33(2): 298–313. doi: 10.1177/0950017018758196.
van den Berg, M. & Vonk, L. (2019). The new discomforts of precarious workers: Wardrobe matter, insecurity and the temporality of calibration in dress work, The Sociological Review. doi: 10.1177/0038026119892402.
Villar, J.G. & Quintana-Domeque, C. (2009). Income and body mass index in Europe, Economics & Human Biology 7(1): 73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2009.01.006
Wacquant, L.J. (1995). Pugs at work: Bodily capital and bodily labour among professional boxers, Body & society 1(1): 65–93. doi: 10.1177/1357034X95001001005
Warde, A. (2005). Consumption and theories of practice, Journal of Consumer Culture 5(2): 131–153. doi: 10.1177/1469540505053090
Warhurst, C. & Nickson, D. (2001). Looking Good, Sounding Right. Style Counselling in the New Economy, London: The Industrial Society. doi: 10.1108/09604520510585370
Williams, C.L. & Connell, C. (2010). “Looking good and sounding right”: Aesthetic labor and social inequality in the retail industry, Work and Occupations 37(3): 349–377. doi: 10.1177/0730888410373744
Witz, A., Warhurst, C. & Nickson, D. (2003). The labour of aesthetics and the aesthetics of organization, Organization 10(1): 33–54. doi: 10.1177/1350508403010001375
Wong, J.S. & Penner, A.M. (2016). Gender and the returns to attractiveness, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44: 113–123. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2016.04.002
Wolf, N. (2002). The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Against Women, Harper Collins.
World Economic Forum (2020). Global Gender Gap Report 2020. Available at: https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality [Accessed 19 February 2020]
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
