Emotional and Aesthetic Labor of Finnish Military Officers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.128596Keywords:
Gender, Ethnicity, Age and Diversity, Organization & ManagementAbstract
This study analyzes the emotional and aesthetic labor of Finnish military officers. It examines the kinds of valuations officers attach to the notion of an ideal soldier. The meanings that officers give to these ideals are explored within the wider framework of post-Fordist new work. The ideal soldier is traditionally considered to be physically capable and strong, rational, and in control—features culturally coded as masculine. An analysis of 108 military officers’ writings and 12 interviews showed that while the traditional masculine ideal still exists, a vast variety of valuations are related to new work. The notion of the new ideal worker includes attributes, such as empathy, emotional intelligence, and social skills, which are culturally coded as feminine qualities. These feminine valuations may work to female officers’ advantage. However, despite fractures in traditional masculine ideals, there are still some deeply rooted gender stereotypes that work to female officers’ disadvantage.
Author Biography
Suvi Kouri, University of Jyväskylä
Doctoral researcher, Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy. E-mail: suvi.kouri@gmail.com
References
Adkins, L. (2002). Revisions: Gender and Sexuality in Late Modernity, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Adkins, L., & Jokinen, E. (2008). Introduction: gender, living and labour in the fourth shift, NORA–Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 16(3): 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740802300947
Ahlbäck, A. (2014). Manhood and the Making of the Military. Conscription, Military Service and Masculinity in Finland, 1917–39, Surrey: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Alvinius, A., Elfgren Boström, M., & Larsson, G. (2015). Leaders as emotional managers: emotion management in response organisations during a hostage taking in a Swedish prison, Leadership & Organization Journal 36(6): 697–711. https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-11-2013-0142
Alvinius, A., Kylin, C., Starrin, B., & Larsson, G. (2014). Emotional smoothness and confidence building: boundary spanners in a civil-military collaboration context, International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 6(3): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijwoe.2014.065757
Årsrapport. (2018). Forsvarets Årsrapport [Defence Forces Annual Report]. https://www.nsd.no/polsys/data/filer/aarsmeldinger/AN_2018_56989.pdf
Bloksgaard, L., Fekjaer, S. B., & Moberg, R. J. (2020). Conceptions of gender and competencies among police recruits in Scandinavia, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 10(2): 43–59. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v10i2.120818
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol I: The Rise of the Network Society, Oxford: Blackwell.
Cockburn, C. (1991). In the Way of Women: Men’s Resistance to Sex Equality in Organizations, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Coleman, R. (2008). The becoming of bodies: girls, media effects, and body image, Feminist Media Studies 8(2): 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680770801980547
Davis, K. D., & McKee, B. (2004). Women in the Military: Facing the Warrior Framework. In F. C. Pinch, A. T. MacIntyre, P. Browne, & A. C. Okros (Eds.) Change in the Military: Gender and Diversity Issues. (pp. 52–75), Winnipeg: The Wing Publishing Office.
Defence Command. (2019). Henkilöstötilinpäätös [Annual Report on Personnel], Helsinki: Pääesikunta. https://puolustusvoimat.fi/documents/1948673/2267037/PEVIESTOS_henkil%C3%B6st%C3%B6tilinp%C3%A4%C3%A4t%C3%B6s_2019.pdf/0f1f588d-3e06-585f-4228-f8522fa8ac52/PEVIESTOS_henkil%C3%B6st%C3%B6tilinp%C3%A4%C3%A4t%C3%B6s_2019.pdf
Eagly, A. H. (2007). Female leadership advantage and disadvantage: resolving the contradictions, Psychology of Women Quarterly 31(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1471-6402.2007.00326.x
Einiö, E. (2019). Mixing the Rich and Poor: The Impact of Peers on Education and Earnings, Helsinki: VATT Working Papers 128. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3511966
Försvarsmakten. (2019). Personalsiffror [Personnel Figures]. https://www.forsvarsmakten.se/sv/organisation/om-var-organisation/personalsiffror/
Forsvarsministeriet. (2020). Kvinder i Forsvaret (Women in Defence Forces]. https://forpers.dk/da/hr-i-tal/kvinder/
Gatrell, C. (2011). Policy and the pregnant body at work: strategies of secrecy, silence and supra-performance, Gender, Work and Organization 18(2): 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00485.x
Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing Qualitative Data, London: Sage Publications.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It). A Feminist Critique of Political Economy, Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
Godfrey, R., & Brevis, J. (2018). ‘Nowhere else sells bliss like this’: exploring the emotional labour of soldiers at war, Gender, Work and Organization 25(6): 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12229
Goldstein, J. S. (2001). War and Gender. How Gender Shapes the War System and Vice Versa, Cambridge: University Press.
Haaland, T. L. (2012). Friendly War-Fighters and Invisible Women. Perceptions of Gender and Masculinities in the Norwegian Armed Forces on Missions Abroad. In A. Kronsell & E. Svedberg (Eds.) Making Gender, Making War. Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices. (pp. 63–75), New York: Routledge.
Halonen, P., & Karvinen, I. (Eds.) (2017). Yleinen palvelusohjesääntö [General Service Regulation], Helsinki: Pääesikunta. https://puolustusvoimat.fi/documents/1948673/2258487/PEVIESTOS_YLPALVO+2017/3684dac2-c7ac-4d93-b792-34649f6e2f5d/PEVIESTOS_YLPALVO+2017.pdf
Heiskanen, T., Korvajärvi, P., & Rantalaiho, L. (2008). Sukupuoli ja työ: pysyvyyttä ja liikahduksia [Gender and Work: Stability and Mobility]. In T. Heiskanen, M. Leinonen, A. Järvensivu, & S. Aho (Eds.) Kohti uutta työelämää. Tutkimuksen näköala työelämän kehitykseen [Towards New Working Life. The Research Perspective on Development of Working Life]. (pp. 109–134), Tampere: Tampere University Press. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-44-7630-3
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The Managed Heart. Commercialization of Human Feeling, Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Jacoby, T. A. (2010). Fighting in the Feminine: The Dilemmas of Combat Women in Israel. In L. Sjoberg & S. Via (Eds.) Gender, War and Militarism. Feminist Perspectives. (pp. 80–90), Santa Barbara, California: Praeger Security International.
Jokinen, A. (Author); Soikkeli, M., & Kivimäki, V. (Eds.) (2019). Isänmaan miehet – Maskuliinisuus, kansakunta ja väkivalta suomalaisessa sotakirjallisuudessa [The Men of the Fatherland – Masculinity, Nation and Violence in the Finnish War Literature], Tampere: Vastapaino.
Jukarainen, P. (2012). Men Making Peace in the Name of Just War. The Case of Finland. In A. Kronsell & E. Svedberg (Eds.) Making Gender, Making War. Violence, Military and Peacekeeping Practices. (pp. 90–103), New York: Routledge.
Kelan, E. K. (2008a). Emotions in a rational profession: the gendering of skills in ICT work, Gender, Work and Organization 15(1): 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2007.00355.x
Kelan, E. K. (2008b). The discursive construction of gender in contemporary management literature, Journal of Business Ethics 81(2): 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9505-2
King, A. (2006). The post-Fordist military, Journal of Political and Military Sociology 34(2): 359–374. https://search.proquest.com/docview/206650624?accountid=11774
King, A. (2013). The Combat Soldier: Infantry Tactics and Cohesion in the Twentieth and Twenty-first Centuries, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leinonen, M., Nikkanen, R., & Otonkorpi-Lehtoranta, K. (2018). Organizational change and employee concerns in the Finnish Defence Forces, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 8(3): 135–153. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v8i3.109544
Lewis, P., & Simpson, R. (Eds.) (2007). Gendering Emotions in Organizations, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
McDowell, L. (1997). Capital Culture: Gender at Work in the City, Oxford: Blackwell.
McDowell, L. (2009). Working Bodies: Interactive Service Employment and Workplace Identities, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
McNay, L. (1999). Gender, habitus and the field: Pierre Bourdieu and the limits of reflexivity, Theory, Culture and Society 16(1): 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F026327699016001007
Mellström, U. (2012). Changing affective economies of masculine machineries and military masculinities? From Ernst Jünger to Shannen Rossmiller, Masculinities and Social Change 2(1): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.4471/MCS.2013.19
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland. (2008). Segregation and the Gender Wage Gap, Helsinki: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.
Moskos, C. C., Williams, J. A., & Segal, D. R. (2000). The Postmodern Military. Armed Forces after the Cold War, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nickson, D., Warhurst, C., Witz, A., & Cullen, A. M. (2001). The Importance of Being Aesthetic: Work, Employment and Service Organization. In A. Sturdy, I. Grugulis, & H. Willmott (Eds.) Customer Service. Empowerment and Entrapment. (pp. 170–190), Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Norheim-Martinsen, P. M. (2016). New sources of military change – armed forces as normal organizations, Defence Studies 16(3): 312– 326. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2016.1195234
Parviainen, J., Kinnunen, T., & Kortelainen, I. (Eds.) (2016). Ruumiillisuus ja työelämä. Työruumis jälkiteollisessa taloudessa [Embodiment and Working Life. Working Body in Post-Industrial Economy], Tampere: Vastapaino.
Persson, A. (2011). Changing Boundaries, Defending Boundaries. Gender Relations in the Swedish Armed Forces, Linköping: Linköping University. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Aliu%3Adiva-71257
Rones, N., & Fasting, K. (2017). Theorizing Military Masculinities and National Identities: The Norwegian Experience. In R. Woodward & C. Duncanson (Eds.) The Palgrave International Handbook of Gender and the Military. (pp. 145–162), London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51677-0_9
Sasson-Levy, O. (2003). Feminism and military gender practices: Israeli women soldiers in “Masculine” Roles, Sociological Inquiry 73(3): 440–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682x.00064
Sasson-Levy, O. (2008). Individual bodies, collective state interests: the case of Israeli combat soldiers, Men and Masculinities 10(3): 296–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184x06287760
Sløk-Andersen, B. (2018). The Becoming of Good Soldiers. An Ethnographic Exploration of Gender and Other Obstacles in the Military Borderland, Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen. https://research-api.cbs.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/58400870/Beate_Sl_k_Andersen.pdf
Steidl, C. R., & Brookshire, A. R. (2019). Just one of the guys until shower time: how symbolic embodiment threatens women’s inclusion in the US military, Gender, Work and Organization 26: 1271–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12320
Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2009). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi [Qualitative Research and Content Analysis], Helsinki: Tammi.
Vaara, J., Viskari, J., Kyröläinen, H., & Santtila, M. (2016). Naissotilaiden mielipiteitä ja kokemuksia fyysisestä kunnosta sekä kuntotestien suoritusvaatimuksista Puolustusvoimissa [Female Soldiers’ Opinions and Experiences on Physical Fitness and Performance Requirements in Fitness Tests in the Defence Forces], Helsinki: Pääesikunta.
Via, S. (2010). Gender, Militarism, and Globalization: Soldiers for Hire and Hegemonic Masculinity. In L. Sjoberg & S. Via (Eds.) Gender, War and Militarism. Feminist Perspectives. (pp. 42–53), Santa Barbara, California: Praeger Security International.
Warhurst, C., & Nickson, D. (2009). ‘Who’s got the look?’ Emotional, aesthetic and sexualized labour in interactive services, Gender, Work and Organization 16(3): 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00450.x
World Economic Forum. (2019). Global Gender Gap Report 2020, Geneva: World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/gender-gap-2020-report-100-years-pay-equality
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at bo.carstens@gmail.com. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
