Acting Agentically at Work: Developing a Short Measure of Professional Agency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.127869Keywords:
Health, Working Environment & Wellbeing, Learning & Competencies, Innovation & Productivity, Identity, Meaning & Culture, Organization & ManagementAbstract
Although professional agency has become an increasingly crucial issue in work organizations, investigators lack a brief instrument to measure it. This paper introduces a short measure to explore professional agency at work. Our aim was to shorten the original 17-item Professional Agency Measure, while also exploring its usability for cross-validating questionnaire datasets, and investigating the relationship between professional agency and work engagement. Three dimensions of professional agency emerged, with three items per dimension, across the domains of healthcare, real estate services, and information technology (all within Finland). All the dimensions (Influencing at work, Participation at work, and Negotiating professional identity) showed good reliability. The results further revealed that these dimensions of agency are distinct from, but closely and positively linked to work engagement. In particular, our research offers a reliable, short measure of professional agency that is relevant across professional domains in the Nordic context.
Author Biographies
Katja Vähäsantanen, University of Jyväskylä
University researcher, Department of Education. E-mail: katja.vahasantanen@jyu.fi
Eija Räikkönen, University of Jyväskylä
Senior lecturer, Faculty of Education and Psychology.
Susanna Paloniemi, University of Jyväskylä
Senior lecturer, Department of Education.
Päivi Hökkä, University of Jyväskylä
University researcher, Department of Education
References
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement, Career Development International 13(3): 209–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430810870476
Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement, Human Relations 65: 1359 –1378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712453471
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin 107(2): 238–246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Billett, S. (2008). Learning through work: Exploring instances of relational interdependencies, International Journal of Educational Research 47(4): 32–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2008.07.006
Billett, S. (2011). Subjectivity, self and personal agency in learning through and for work. In: M. Malloch, L. Cairns, L. Evans, & B. O’Connor (eds.) SAGE handbook of workplace learning, London: Sage, pp. 60–72. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446200940.n5
Burisch, M. (1984). Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits, The American Psychologist 39(3): 214–227. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.3.214
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Collin, K., Paloniemi, S., & Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Multiple forms of professional agency for (non)crafting of work practices in hospital organisation, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 5(3a): 63–83. doi: https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v5i3a.4834
Damsa, C. I., Froehlich, D. E., & Gegenfurtner, A. (2017). Reflections on empirical and methodological accounts of agency at work. In: M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (eds.) Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development, Cham: Springer, pp. 445–464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_22
Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied Missing Data Analysis, New York: Guilford Publications. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.2012.00656.x
Eteläpelto, A. (2017). Emerging conceptualisations on professional agency and learning. In: M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (eds.) Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development, Cham: Springer, pp. 183–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_10
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K. Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work, Educational Research Review 10: 45–65. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research 18(1): 39–50. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gallie, D. (2009). Institutional regimes and employee influence at work, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 2(3): 1–15.
Goller, M. (2017). Human Agency at Work: An Active Approach towards Expertise Development, Wiesbaden: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18286-1
Goller, M., & Billett, S. (2014). Agentic behaviour at work: Crafting learning experiences. In: C. Harteis, A. Rausch & J. Seifried (eds.) Discourses on professional learning: On the boundary between learning and working, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 25–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7012-6_3
Goller, M., & Paloniemi, S. (eds.) (2017). Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development, Cham: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0
Grosemans, I., Smet, K., Houben, E., De Cuyper, N., & Kyndt, E. (2020). Development and validation of an instrument to measure work-related learning, Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 5(1): 3, 1–16. doi: http://doi.org/10.16993/sjwop.99
Haapasaari, A., & Kerosuo, H. (2015). Transformative agency: The challenges of sustainability in a long chain of double stimulation, Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 4: 37–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2014.07.006
Harteis, C., Goller, M., & Caruso, C. (2020). Conceptual change in the face of digitalization: Challenges for workplaces and workplace learning, Frontiers in Education 5(1): 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00001
Heiskanen, T., & Jokinen, E. (2015). Resources and constraints of line manager agency in municipal reforms, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 5(3): 79–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v5i3.4808
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In: R. Hoyle (ed.) Structural equation modeling: Issues, concepts, and applications, Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 76–99.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1): 1–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
LaPointe, K., & Heilmann, P. (2014). ‘Daring leaps’ Construction of meaning and individual agency in career change narratives in the media, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 4(2): 47–64. doi: https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v4i2.3864
Lehto, A-M., & Sutela, H. (2014). Työolojen muutokset 1977–2013. [Changes in working conditions 1977–2013], Official Statistics of Finland, Helsinki: Statistics Finland.
Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching, Structural Equation Modeling 16(3): 439–476. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903008220
Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance, Psychometrika 58(4): 525–543. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02294825
Mustomäki, A., Anttila, T., & Oinas, T. (2013). Engaged or not? A comparative study on factors inducing work engagement in call center and service sector work, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 3(1): 49–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v3i1.2520
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide, Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900308
Paloniemi, S., & Goller, M. (2017). The multifaceted nature of agency and professional learning. In: M. Goller & S. Paloniemi (eds.) Agency at work: An agentic perspective on professional learning and development, Cham: Springer, pp. 465–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_23
Parker, S., & Bindl, U. K. (Eds.). (2017). Proactivity at work: Making things happen in organizations, New York: Routledge.
Popova-Nowak, I. V. (2010). Work identity and work engagement, Washington, DC: George Washington University. https://www.ufhrd.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/9_5.pdf
Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Moate, J. (2016). Who and how? Preservice teachers as active agents developing professional identities, Teaching and Teacher Education 55: 318–327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.022
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis, Psychometrika 66(4): 507–514. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02296192
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study, Educational and Psychological Measurement 66(4): 701–716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Contzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach, Journal of Happiness Studies 3(1): 71–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2019). An ultra-short measure for work engagement: The UWES-3 validation across five countries, European Journal of Psychological Assessment 35(4): 577–591. doi: https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000430
Smith, R. (2012). Clarifying the subject centred approach to vocational learning theory: Negotiated participation, Studies in Continuing Education 34(2): 159–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2011.609542
Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., & Demerouti, E. (2010). Not all days are created equal: The concept of state work engagement. In: A. B. Bakker & M. P. Leiter (eds.) Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, New York: Psychology Press, pp. 25–38.
Stanton, J. M., Sinar, E. F., Balzer, W. K., & Smith, P. C. (2002). Issues and strategies for reducing the length of self-report scales, Personnel Psychology 55(1): 167–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00108.x
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach, Multivariate Behavioral Research 25(2): 173–180. doi: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale, Journal of Vocational Behavior 80: 173–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis, Psychometrika 38(1): 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170
Tynjälä, P. (2013). Toward a 3-P model of workplace learning: A literature review, Vocations and Learning 6(1): 11–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-012-9091-z
Ursin, J., Vähäsantanen, K., McAlpine, L., & Hökkä, P. (2020). Emotionally loaded identity and agency in Finnish academic work, Journal of Further and Higher Education 44(3): 311–325. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2018.1541971
Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., Paloniemi, S., Herranen, S., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017a). Professional learning and agency in an identity coaching programme, Professional Development in Education 43(4): 514–536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1231131
Vähäsantanen, K., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2017b). Agentic perspective on fostering work-related learning, Studies in Continuing Education 39(3): 251–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2017.1310097
Vähäsantanen, K., Räikkönen, E., Paloniemi, S., Hökkä, P., & Eteläpelto, A. (2019). A novel instrument to measure the multidimensional structure of professional agency, Vocations and Learning 12(2): 267–295. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12186-018-9210-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. Normally the journal use the CC-BY NC-ND 4.0 licence.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at bo.carstens@gmail.com. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
Sherpa/Romeo
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
Archives policy
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
Plagiarism screening
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.
