Bridging the Dialectical Histories in Organizational Change: Hysteresis in Scandinavian Telecommunications Privatization
Keywords:Health, Working Environment & Wellbeing, Learning & Competencies, Identity, Meaning & Culture, Organization & Management
Conventionally, organizational change research has viewed history as objective facts associated with path dependencies, making change difficult. However, started with the work of Suddaby et al. (2010), a different stance has emerged, viewing history as a subjective, narrative construction that can be utilized to facilitate change. This paper responds to calls for ways of bridging these two perceptions and increasing historical consciousness in organizational change studies. To these ends, the paper explores the capacity of Bourdieu’s construct of hysteresis as a bridging construct. Based on an ethnographic study, the paper operationalizes hysteresis to analyze the response strategies of technicians and shop stewards to organizational change following privatization in a Scandinavian telecommunications company. The paper argues that hysteresis constitutes a valuable alternative to bridging constructs available in extant literature and holds the potential to open new avenues for exploring the implications of history for organizational change.
Abrahams, J., & Ingram, N. (2013). The chameleon habitus: Exploring local students’ negotiations of multiple fields, Sociological Research Online, 18(4): 1-14.
Abrahams, J., & Ingram, N. (2015). Stepping outside of oneself: how a cleft-habitus can lead to greater reflexivity through occupying ‘the third space’. In Bourdieu: The Next Generation: The development of Bourdieu's intellectual heritage in contemporary UK sociology. (pp. 168-184): Routledge.
Andersen, T. M., et al. (2007). The Nordic Model. Embracing globalization and sharing risks. Yliopistopaino, Helsinki, FI: The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy (ETLA).
Barry, D., & Elmes, M. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review 22(2): 429-452.
Boje, D. (2001) Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research, London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Booth, C. (2003). Does history matter in strategy? The possibilities and problems of counterfactual analysis, Management Decision 41(1): 96-104.
Bourdieu, P. (1981). Men and machines, Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: 304-317.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice (R. Nice, Trans.): Cambridge.
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2005). The Social Structures of the Economy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. J. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Brunninge, O. (2009). Using history in organizations: How managers make purposeful reference to history in strategy processes, Journal of Organizational Change Management 22(1): 8-26.
Bullock, R., & Batten, D. (1985). It's just a phase we're going through: a review and synthesis of OD phase analysis, Group & Organization Studies 10(4): 383-412.
Byrkjeflot, H. (2001). "The Nordic model of democracy and management." The democratic challenge to capitalism: Management and democracy in the Nordic countries: 19-45.
Børve, H. E. and E. Kvande (2012). "The Nordic model in a global company situated in Norway. Challenging institutional orders?" Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 2(4): 117-134.
Carroll, C. E. (2002). Introduction: The strategic use of the past and future in organizational change, Journal of Organizational Change Management 15(6): 556-562.
Clark, P., & Rowlinson, M. (2004). The treatment of history in organisation studies: towards an ‘historic turn’? Business History 46(3): 331-352.
Cummings, T., & Huse, E. (1989). Organisation Development and Change, West, St. Paul, MI.
Cunliffe, A. (2015). Using ethnography in strategy-as-practice research. In Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice (Vol. 2, pp. 431-446).
Dawson, P., & Sykes, C. S. (2016). Organizational Change and Temporality: Bending the Arrow of Time (Vol. 15), New York: Routledge.
Ericson, M. (2006). Exploring the future exploiting the past, Journal of Management History 12(2): 121-136.
Ervasti, H., Fridberg, T., Hjerm, M., & Ringdal, K. (2008). Nordic social attitudes in a European perspective, Cheltenham, UK. Northampton; MA. USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Foster, W. M., Coraiola, D. M., Suddaby, R., Kroezen, J., & Chandler, D. (2017). The strategic use of historical narratives: a theoretical framework, Business History 59(8): 1176-1200.
Foster, W. M., & Suddaby, R. (2015). Processing history. In T. G. Weatherbee, P. G. McLaren, & A. Mills (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History (pp. 363-371), London and New York: Routledge.
Garud, R., & Karnoe, P. (2013). Path Dependence and Creation: Psychology Press.
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Fabbri, T. (2002). Revising the past (while thinking in the future perfect tense), Journal of Organizational Change Management 15(6): 622-634.
Greve, C., & Andersen, K. V. (2001). Management of telecommunications service provision: an analysis of the Tele Danmark company 1990–8, Public Management Review 3(1): 35-52.
Hardy, C. (2008). Hysteresis. In M. Grenfell (Ed.), Pierre Bourdieu: Key Concepts (pp. 131-148), Durham, UK: Acumen.
Hasse, C. (2015). Towards Nested Engagement. In An Anthropology of Learning (pp. 211-249): Springer.
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2017). Toward a theory of using history authentically: Historicizing in the Carlsberg Group, Administrative Science Quarterly 62(4): 657-697.
Huy, Q. N. (2001). Time, Temporal Capability, and Planned Change, The Academy of Management Review 26(4): 601-623. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.5393897
Jordfald, B., & Murhem, S. (2003). Liberalisering, globalisering og faglige strategier i nordisk telekommunikation. Retrieved from SALTSA – JOINT PROGRAMME FOR WORKING LIFE RESEARCH IN EUROPE - The National Institute for Working Life and The Swedish Trade Unions in Co-operation.
Kerr, R., & Robinson, S. (2009). The hysteresis effect as creative adaptation of the habitus: Dissent and transition to the ‘corporate’in post-Soviet Ukraine, Organization 16(6): 829-853.
Kettunen, P. (2012). Reinterpreting the historicity of the nordic model, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 2(4): 21-43.
Koll, H. (2019). Privatisering af telebranchen: Hysteresiseffekten som bro til en historisk bevidsthed, Tidsskrift for Arbejdsliv 21(2): 67-85.
Koll, H. & Ernst, J. (Forthcoming). Caught between times: Explaining resistance to change through the tale of Don Quixote. In Ernst, J., Robinson, S., Larsen, K. and Thomassen, O. J. (Eds.), Bourdieu in studies of organization and management: A relational perspective, Routledge.
Koll, H., & Jensen Schleiter, A. (Forthcoming December 2020). Appropriating the Past in Organizational Change Management: Abandoning and Embracing History. In Reinecke, J., Suddaby, R., Langley, A. & Tsoukas, H. (Eds.), Time, Temporality , and History in Process Organization Studies (P-PROS) (Vol. 10), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kotter, J. P. (1995). Leading change: Why transformation efforts fail, Havard Business Review 73: 59-67.
Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing: Sage.
Lane, J.-E. (1997). "Public sector reform in the Nordic countries." Public sector reform: rationale, trends and problems: 188-208.
Lewin, K. (1947). Group decision and social change, Readings in Social Psychology 3(1): 197-211.
Lubinski, C. (2018). "From ‘History as Told’ to ‘History as Experienced’: Contextualizing the Uses of the Past." Organization Studies 39(12): 1785-1809.
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., & Clegg, S. R. (2016). CONCEPTUALIZING HISTORICAL ORGANIZATION STUDIES, Academy of Management Review 41(4): 609-632. doi:10.5465/amr.2014.0133
Maclean, M., Harvey, C., Sillince, J. A., & Golant, B. (2018). Intertextuality, Rhetorical History and the Uses of the Past in Organizational Transition, Organization Studies 39(12): 1733-1755. doi:10.1177/0170840618789206
McDonough, P., & Polzer, J. (2012). Habitus, hysteresis and organizational change in the public sector, Canadian Journal of Sociology 37(4): 357-380.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, Sage.
Mordhorst, M. (2008). "From counterfactual history to counter-narrative history." Management & Organizational History 3(1): 5-26.
Müller, J., Bohlin, E., Karpakka, J., Riis, C., & Skouby, K. E. (1993). Telecommunications liberalization in the Nordic countries, Telecommunications Policy 17(8): 623-630.
Noss, C. (2002). Taking Time Seriously: Organizational Change, Flexibility, and the Present. In R. Whipp, B. Adam, & I. Sabelis (Eds.), Making Time: Time and Management in Modern Organizations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oberg, A., et al. (2017). Where history, visuality, and identity meet: institutional paths to visual diversity among organizations, Multimodality, Meaning, and Institutions, Emerald Publishing Limited.
Oertel, S., & Thommes, K. (2018). History as a source of organizational identity creation, Organization Studies 39(12): 1709-1731. doi:10.1177/0170840618800112
Parker, D. (1995). "Privatization and the internal environment: Developing our knowledge of the adjustment process." International Journal of Public Sector Management 8(2): 44-62.
Pettigrew, A. M., Woodman, R. W., & Cameron, K. S. (2001). Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research, The Academy of Management Journal 44(4): 697-713. doi:10.2307/3069411
Procter S and Randall J. (2012) Changing attitudes to employee attitudes to change: From resistance to ambivalence and ambiguity. In: Boje, D., Burnes, B., and Hassard, J. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Organizational Change, Routledge: 366-375.
Rouleau, L. (2010). Studying strategizing through narratives of practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of Strategy as Practice (pp. 258-270), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Saldaña, J. (2015). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, Sage.
Schreyögg, G., Sydow, J., & Holtmann, P. (2011). How history matters in organisations: The case of path dependence, Management & Organizational History 6(1): 81-100.
Schultz, M., & Hernes, T. (2013). A temporal perspective on organizational identity, Organization Science 24(1): 1-21.
Shipp, A. J., & Cole, M. S. (2015). Time in individual-level organizational studies: What is it, how is it used, and why isn’t it exploited more often? Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2(1): 237-260.
Sieweke, J. (2014). Pierre Bourdieu in management and organization studies—A citation context analysis and discussion of contributions, Scandinavian Journal of Management 30(4): 532-543.
Suddaby, R. (2016). Toward a historical consciousness: Following the historic turn in management thought, M@ n@ gement 19(1): 46-60.
Suddaby, R., & Foster, W. M. (2017). History and Organizational Change, Journal of Management 43(1): 19-38. doi:10.1177/0149206316675031
Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Quinn Trank, C. (2010). Rhetorical history as a source of competitive advantage. In The globalization of strategy research (pp. 147-173): Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box, Academy of Management Review 34(4): 689-709.
Thomas R and Hardy C. (2011) Reframing resistance to organizational change, Scandinavian Journal of Management 27: 322-331.
Tsoukas, H. and R. Chia (2002). "On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change." Organization Science 13(5): 567-582.
Van de Ven, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (2005). Alternative approaches for studying organizational change, Organization Studies 26(9): 1377-1404.
Wacquant, L. (2016). A concise genealogy and anatomy of habitus, The Sociological Review 64(1): 64-72.
Wadhwani, R. D., Suddaby, R., Mordhorst, M., & Popp, A. (2018). History as Organizing: Uses of the Past in Organization Studies, Organization Studies 39(12): 1663-1683. doi:10.1177/0170840618814867
Weatherbee, T. G., McLaren, P. G., & Mills, A. J. (2015). Introduction: The historic turn in management and organizational studies: a companion reading. In T. G. Weatherbee, P. G. McLaren, & A. J. Mills (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management and Organizational History (pp. 3-10), London and New York: Routledge.
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development, Annual Review of Psychology 50(1): 361-386
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. This Journal gives Open Access with CreativeCommons license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
You can download all the content of the Journal and share it with others as long as you credit the authors and the journal, but you can’t change it in any way or use it commercially.
More specifically this license means that you – authors and users – may:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form as long as you follow the license terms. The freedom to share includes parallel publishing on authors’ own website and in institutional repositories or in ResearchGate after publication in NJWLS, or if you want to reprint your article as part of publication of a PhD-thesis or a dissertation
You may share under these terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit and provide a link to the license. Appropriate credit implies that you provide the name of the creator and attribution parties, a copyright notice, a license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material. The link used should be its DOI.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. A commercial use is one primarily intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. Merely changing the format never creates a derivative.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at firstname.lastname@example.org. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.