Regulating Flexibility: Uber’s Platform as a Technological Work Arrangement

Keywords: Health, Working Environment & Wellbeing, Employment, Wages, Unemployment & Rehabilitation, Gender, Ethnicity, Age and Diversity, Organization & Management


When initiating its Norwegian operations, the transportation platform Uber adjusted its business model to the Norwegian regulation of the taxi market by focusing on its high-end offering, Uber Black, organized through limousine companies who employ the drivers and own the cars. The Uber Black drivers in Oslo are classified as employees and endowed with a substantially flexible work arrangement. Based on a ‘traveling ethnography’ among Uber Black drivers in Oslo, this article conceptualizes Uber’s digital platform as a technological work arrangement. The analysis shows that while the platform is experienced as an opaque form of management that limits the drivers’ formal flexibility, the effects of the technological work arrangement is contingent on the drivers’ formal work arrangement and the characteristics of the Uber Black market in Oslo.

Author Biography

Sigurd M. Nordli Oppegaard, Fafo Institute of Labour and Social Research

Researcher at Fafo,  and Doctoral Research Fellow, Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo



Aarhaug, J. (2014). Taxis as Urban Transport, TØI report 1308/2014, Oslo: Institute of Transport Economics.

Alsos, K., Jesnes, K., Øistad, B. & Nesheim, T. (2017). Når sjefen er en app [When the boss is an app], Fafo report 2017:41, Oslo: Fafo. doi:

Andersen, SK., Dølvik, JE. & Ibsen, CL. (2014). Nordic Labour Market Models in Open Markets, ETUI report 132, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute.

Angrist, JD., Caldwell, S. & Hall, JV. (2017). Uber vs. taxi: A driver’s eye view, Working Paper No. 23891, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:

Berg, J. & Johnston, H. (2019). Too good to be true? A comment on Hall and Krueger’s analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners, ILR Review 72(1): 39–68. doi:

Berger, T., Frey, CB., Levin, G. & Danda, SR. (2019). Uber happy? Work and well-being in the “Gig Economy”, Economic Policy, eiz007: doi:

Botsman, R. & Rogers, R. (2011). What’s Mine is Yours, London: Collins.

Braverman, H. ([1974]1998). Labor and Monopoly Capital. The Degradation of work in the Twenthieth Century, New York: Monthly Review Press.

Brox, O. (2016). På vei mot et postindustrielt klassesamfunn? [Towards a post-industrial class society?], Oslo: Pax.

Chen, MK., JA. Chevalier, PE. Rossi & E. Oehlsen. (2017). The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers, Working Paper No. 23296, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:

Chen, MK. & M. Sheldon. (2015). Dynamic pricing in a labor market: surge pricing and flexible work on the Uber platform, Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, 1–19. doi:

Cohen, P., R. Hahn, J. Hall, S. Levitt & R. Metcalfe. (2016). Using big data to estimate consumer surplus: the case of Uber, Working Paper No. 22627, National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:

Dagens Næringsliv. (2018). Taxinæringen bremser opp - privatsjåfør-selskaper vokser, Dagens Næringsliv. Avaiable at: [Accessed 8 July 2020].

Drahokoupil, J. & Piasna, A. (2019). Work in the Platform Economy: Deliveroo Riders in Belgium and the SMart Arrangement, ETUI Working Paper 2019.01, Brussels: European Trade Union Institute. doi:

Dølvik, JE. & K. Jesnes. (2018). Nordic Labour Markets and the Sharing Economy. Report from a pilot project, TemaNord report 2018:516, Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. doi:

Elwood, SA. & DG. Martin. (2000). “Placing” interviews: location and scales of power in qualitative research, The Professional Geographer 52(4): 649–657. doi:

Gandini, A. (2019). Labour process theory and the gig economy, Human Relations 72(6): 1039–1056. doi:

Hall, JV., Kendrick, C. & Nosko C. (2015). The effects of Uber’s surge pricing: A case study, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business. Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Hall, JV. & Krueger, AB. (2018). An analysis of the labor market for Uber’s driver-partners in the United States, ILR Review 71(3): 705–732. doi:

Hotvedt, MJ. (2016). Arbeidsgiveransvar i formidlingsøkonomien? Tilfellet Uber [Employer responsibilities in the platform economy? The case of Uber], Lov og rett 55(8): 484–503. doi:

Ilsøe, A., Larsen, TP. & Rasmussen, S. (2019). Precarious work in the Nordics: introduction to the theme of the special issue, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(S6) 1–6. doi:

Jamil, R. (2020). Uber and the making of an Algopticon – instights from the daily life of Montreal drivers, Capital & Class 1–21. doi:

Jensen, RS., B. Jordfald & M. Bråten (2014), Norsk transport – veien videre [Norwegian Transport – the road ahead], Fafo report 2014:3, Oslo: Fafo.

Jesnes, K. (2019). Employment models of platform companies in Norway: a distinctive approach? Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(S6) 53–73. doi:

Jesnes, K. & Oppegaard, S. M. N. (eds). (2020). Platform Work in the Nordic Models: Issues, Cases and Responses, TemaNord report 513 Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. doi:

Lee, MK., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E. & Dabbish, L. (2015). Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: 1603–1612. doi:

Ministry of Transport and Communications (2018). Høringsnotat. Endringer i drosjereguleringen. Oppheving av behovsprøving mv. [Hearing note. Changes in the taxi regulation. Repealing of means testing etc.], Ministrt of Transport and Communications. Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Nergaard, K. (2018). Tilknytningsformer i norsk arbeidsliv. Sluttrapport [Forms of employment in Norwegian working life. Final report], Fafo report 2018:38, Oslo: Fafo.

Oppegaard, SMN. (2018). The Strains of Luxury. Labor in the Platform Economy. The Case of Uber Black in Oslo. Master’s thesis, Oslo: Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo.

Oppegaard, SMN. (2020). Gig- og plattformøkonomien i den norske arbeidslivsmodellen – forutsetninger og konsekvenser. En casestudie av Uber Black i Oslo [The gig and platform economy in the Norwegian labor market model – prerequisites and consequences. A case study of Uber Black in Oslo], Søkelys på arbeidslivet 37(3): 201–215. doi:

Oppegaard, SMN., Ilsøe, A., Jesnes, K., Rolandsson, B. & Saloniemi, A. (2019). Uber in the Nordic Countries: Challenges and Adjustments, Nordic future of work Brief 1, Oslo: Fafo.

Oppegaard, SMN., Saari, T. & Saloniemi, A. (2020). Uber’s trajectories in the Nordic countries, in K. Jesnes & S. Oppegaard (eds.), Platform work in the Nordic models: Issues, cases and responses, TemaNord report 513, Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. doi:

Oslo Municipality. (n.d.). Søk om selskapsvognløyve [Apply for limousine service operator license]. Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP. doi:

Peticca-Harris, A., deGama, N., & Ravishankar, M. N. (2020). Postcapitalist precarious work and those in the ‘drivers’ seat: Exploring the motivations and lived experiences of Uber drivers in Canada, Organization 27(1): 36–59. doi:

Prassl, J. (2018). Humans as a Service: The Promise and Perils of Work in the Gig Economy, Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:

Professional Transportation Act (2002). Act on Professional Transport by Motor Vehicle and Vessel (Professional Transport Act). Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Rasmussen, S., Nätti, J., Larsen, TP., Ilsøe, A. & Garde, AH. (2019). Nonstandard Employment in the Nordics – towards precarious work?, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies 9(S6): 7–32. doi:

Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How Algorithms are Rewriting the Rules of Work, Oakland: University of California Press. doi:

Rosenblat, A. & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers, International Journal Of Communication 10(27): 3758–3784. doi:

Statistics Norway. (2019). Earnings. Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Thelen, K. (2018). Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States, American Political Science Association 16(4): 938–953. doi:

Uber. (2017). Uber B.V. Alvtalevilkår [Uber B.V. Terms of use]. Available at:〈=nb&name=general-terms-of-use [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Uber. (n.d.-a). Driving with Uber in Norway. Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Uber. (n.d.-b). Ride Like a Pro. Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Uber. (n.d.-c). Understanding ratings. Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Uber. (n.d.-d). What is dynamic pricing? Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Wood, AJ., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V. & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy, Work, Employment and Society 33(1): 56–75. doi:

Woodcock, J. & Graham, M. (2020). The Gig Economy. A Critical Introduction, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Working Environment Act. (2005). Act relating to working environment, working hours and employment protection, etc. (Working Environment Act). Available at: [Accessed 18 March 2020].

Wu, Q., Zhang, H. Li, Z. & Lui, K. (2019). Labor control in the gig economy: evidence from Uber in China, Journal of Industrial Relations 61(4): 574–596. doi:

Zysman, J. & Kenney, M. (2018). The next phase in the digital revolution: intelligent tools, platforms, growth, employment, Communications of the ACM 61(2): 54–63. doi:

How to Cite
Oppegaard, S. (2020). Regulating Flexibility: Uber’s Platform as a Technological Work Arrangement. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies.