The Pursuit of the Source, or The Inevitability of Death
The purpose of this article is to apply the method of the genre of studying chains of references to an instance of a secondary source of the contested concept of ‘resistance to change’ back to the primary source and thereby exercise criticism of the sources. This includes discussing whether the theory itself is empirically sustainable or sufficiently scientifically grounded. In the article, we adopt a theoretical lens of Critical Realist Discourse Analysis, mainly because it is sensitive to the importance of the influence of nondiscursive social positions on discourses. The primary source of the chain of theories of resistance to change turns out to be Kübler-Ross’s model of stages of dying patients’ reactions to their immanent death. We find that the model is systematically misinterpreted to fit the empirically false idea of resistance to change of the ideological discourses of management research.
Adams, John (1969). Phases of personal and professional development. (Unpublished doctor’s dissertation.) Cleveland, Ohio: Case Western Reserve University.
Adams, John, John Hayes & Barrie Hopson (1976). Introduction, p. ix–xiii in John Adams, John Hayes & Barrie Hopson (1976) Transition: Understanding and managing personal change, London: Martin Robertson.
Peter Campbell, Tamsin Cox & Dave O’Brien (2017). The social life of measurement: how methods have shaped the idea of culture in urban regeneration, Journal of Cultural Econ- omy 10(1): 49–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2016.1248474.
Choi, Myungweon & Wendy E. A. Ruona (2010). Individual readiness for organizational change and its implications for human resource and organization development, Human Resource Development Review 10(1): 46–73.
Coch, Lester & Johan R. P. French (1948). Overcoming resistance to change, Human Rela- tions 1(4): 512–532. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674800100408.
Danermark, Berth, Mats Ekström & Jan Ch. Karlsson (2019, 2. ed.). Explaining Society. Critical Realism in the Social Sciences, London: Routledge.
Daugird, Allen & Donald Spencer (1996). Physician reactions to the health care revolution. A grief model approach, Archives of Family Medicine 5: 497–500.
Dent, Erik B. & Susan Galloway Goldberg (1999). Challenging ’resistance to change.’ Journal of Applied Social Science 35(1): 25–41.
Elrod, P. David & Donald D. Tippett (2002). The ’death valley‘ of change, Journal of Organizational Change Management 15(3): 273–291. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210429309.
Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and Power, Harlow: Longman
Fairclough, Norman (1992). Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press. Fairclough, Norman (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual analysis for Social Research, New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman (2005). Peripheral vision: discourse analysis in organization studies: the case for critical realism, Organization Studies 26(6): 915–939. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605054610.
Fairclough, Norman (2009). A dialectical-relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research, pp. 162–186 in Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2. ed.), London: Sage.
Fairclough, Norman, Bob Jessop and Andrew Sayer (2002). Critical realism and semiosis, Alethia 5(1): 2–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1558/aleth.v5i1.2.
Fleetwood, Steve (2004). An ontology for organization and management studies, pp. 27–53 in Steve Fleetwood and Stephen Ackroyd (eds) Critical Realism Applications in organization and management studies, London: Routledge.
Fleetwood, Steve (2005). Ontology in organization and management studies: a critical realist perspective, Organization 12(2): 197–222.
Foskett, John (2001). What of the clients-eye view? A response to the millennium review, British Journal of Guidance & Councelling 29(3): 345–350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880120073058.
Goodman, Elisabeth & Lucy Loh (2011). Organizational change: a critical challenge for team effectiveness, Business Information Review 28(4): 242–250. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382111427087.
Gravetter, Frederick J. & Lori-Ann B. Forzano (2012). Research Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Harzing, Anne-Wil (2002). Are our referencing errors undermining our scholarship and cred- ibility? The case of expatriate failure rates, Journal of Organizational Behavior 23(1): 127–148.
Hayes, John (2002). The Theory and Practice of Change Management, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hayes, John (2018). The Theory and Practice of Change Management, Basingstoke: Palgrave. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-352-00132-7.
Hayes, John & Peter Hyde (1996). Transitions workshop. (Unpublished manual.), Reading: Hyde Management Consulting.
Hopson, Barrie & John Adams (1976). Towards an understanding of transition: Defining some boundaries of transition dynamics, pp. 3–25 in John Adams, John Hayes & Barrie Hopson (1976, eds) Transition: Understanding and managing personal change, London: Martin Robertson.
Huzell, Henrietta (2005). Management och motstånd. Offentlig sektor i omvandling – en fallstudie. (Management and resistance. Public sector in transformation – a case study.), Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
Imara, Mwalimu (1975). Dying as the last stage of growth, pp. 147–163 in Elisabeth Kübler-Ross (ed.) Death: the final stage of growth. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Irgens, Eirik J. (2011). Dynamiske og lærende organisasjoner: Ledelse og utvikling i et ar- beidsliv i endring. (Dynamic and learning organizations: Leadership and development in a changing working life.) Bergen: Fagboksforlaget.
Jacobsen, Dag Ingvar & Jan Thorsvik (2019). Hvordan organisasjoner fungerer. (How Organizations Work.), Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Jones, David J. & Ronald J. Recarda (2013). Leading and Implementing Business Change Management. Making Change Stick in the Contemporary Organization, London: Routledge. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073957.
Karlsson, Jan Ch. (2012). Organizational Misbehavior in the Workplace. Narratives of Dignity and Resistance, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Karlsson, Jan Ch. & Ann Bergman (2012). Methods for Social Theory. Analytical Tools for Theorizing and Writing, London: Routledge.
Kearney, Kerri S. & Adrienne E. Hyle (2015). A look through the Kubler-Ross theoretical lens, pp. 109–128 in Vincent A. Anfara & Norma J. Mertz (eds) Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Kellehear, Allan (2009). Introduction, pp. vii–xviii in Elisabeth Kübler-Ross (ed.) On death and dying: What the dying has to teach doctors, nurses, clergy and their own families, Oxon: Routledge.
Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth (1969). On death and dying. What the dying have to teach doctors, nurses, clergy and their own families, New York: Macmillan.
Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth (1975). Death: the final stage of growth, p. 145 in Elisabeth Kübler-Ross (ed.) Death. The final stage of growth, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Kübler-Ross, Elisabeth (2009 ). On death and dying: What the dying has to teach doctors, nurses, clergy and their own families, Oxon: Routledge.
Lewin, Kurt (1951). Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers (Edited by Dorwin Cartwright.), New York: Harper & Row.
Mitchell, Deb, Lisa O’Brien, Anne Bardoel & Terry Haines (2019). Understanding health pro- fessional responses to service disinvestment: a qualitative study, International Journal of Health Policy Management 8(7): 403–411. doi: https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.20.
Morrisey, Locke J. (2002). Bibliometric and bibliographical analysis in an era of electronic scholarly communication, Science & Technology Libraries 22(3–4): 149–160.
Myers, Piers, Sally Hulks & Liz Wiggins (2012). Organizational change. Perspectives on the- ory and practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Newman, Jack (2020). Critical realism, critical discourse analysis, and the morphogenetic approach, Journal of Critical Realism (Prepublished). doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1758986.
Oreg, Shaul (2003). Resistance to change: developing an individual differences measure, Journal of Applied Psychology 88(4): 680–693. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680.
Orridge, Martin (2009). Change leadership. Developing a change-adept organization, Farnham: Gower.
Pardo del Val, Manuela and Clara Martinez Fuentes (2003). Resistance to change: a literature review and empirical study, Management Decision 41(2): 148–155.
Rekdal, Ole Bjørn (2014a). Academic citation practice: a sinking sheep? Portal: Libraries and the Academy 14(4): 567–585. doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0025.
Rekdal, Ole Bjørn (2014b). Academic urban legends, Social Studies of Science 44(4): 638–654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714535679.
Wiggins, Liz (2009). Managing the ups and downs of change communication. Applying the- ories of psychology to guide employees through the change journey, Strategic Communication Management 13(1): 20–23.
Wodak, Ruth & Michael Meyer (2009). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (2. ed.), London: Sage.
Wright, Malcome & J. Scott Armstrong (2008). The ombudsman: verification of citations: Fawlty towers of knowledge? Interfaces 38(2): 125–139.
Yilmaz, Derya and Gökhan Kiliçoğlu (2013). Resistance to change and ways of reducing resistance in educational institutions, European Journal of Research on Education 1(1): 14–21.
Zander, Alvin (1950). Resistance to change—its analysis and prevention, Advanced Management Journal 15(1): 9–11.
Copyright (c) 2020 Author and Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The Copyright Holder of this Journal is the authors and the Journal. This Journal gives Open Access with CreativeCommons license CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.
You can download all the content of the Journal and share it with others as long as you credit the authors and the journal, but you can’t change it in any way or use it commercially.
More specifically this license means that you – authors and users – may:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or form as long as you follow the license terms. The freedom to share includes parallel publishing on authors’ own website and in institutional repositories or in ResearchGate after publication in NJWLS, or if you want to reprint your article as part of publication of a PhD-thesis or a dissertation
You may share under these terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit and provide a link to the license. Appropriate credit implies that you provide the name of the creator and attribution parties, a copyright notice, a license notice, a disclaimer notice, and a link to the material. The link used should be its DOI.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes. A commercial use is one primarily intended for commercial advantage or monetary compensation.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material. Merely changing the format never creates a derivative.
Exceptions to the license terms may be granted
If you want to use content in the Journal in another way then described by this license, you must contact the licensor and ask for permission. Contact Bo Carstens at firstname.lastname@example.org. Exceptions are always given for specific purposes and specific content only.
The Journal is listed as a blue journal in Sherpa/Romeo, meaning that the author can archive post-print ((ie final draft post-refereeing) and author can archive publisher's version/PDF.
Copyright of others
Authors are responsible for obtaining permission from copyright holders for reproducing any illustrations, tables, figures or lengthy quotations previously published elsewhere.
All published material is archived at Roskilde University Library, Denmark, and transmitted to the Danish Royal Library in conformity with the Danish rules of legal deposit.
We do not screen articles for plagiarism. It is the responsibility of the authors to make sure they do not plagiate.