Metafor, opmærksomhed og grammatikalisering

Arzouan, Yossi, Abraham Goldstein & Miriam Faust (2007): Brainwaves are stethoscopes: ERP correlates of novel metaphor comprehension. Brain Research 1160, 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.034.

Boye, Kasper (2023): Grammaticalization as Conventionalization of Discursively Secondary Status: Deconstructing the Lexical–Grammatical Continuum. Transactions of the Philological Society 121(2), 270–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12265.

Boye, Kasper (2024): Evidentiality, discourse prominence and grammaticalization. Studies in Language 48(3), 575–607. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.23001.boy.

Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder (2012): A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2012.0020.

Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca (1994): The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Christensen, Marie Herget, Line Burholt Kristensen, Nicoline Munck Vinther & Kasper Boye (2021): Grammar is background in sentence processing. Language and Cognition 13(1), 128-153. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2020.30.

Corcoran, D. W. J. (1966): An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature 210(5036), 658–658. https://doi.org/10.1038/210658a0.

Danchev, Andrev & Merja Kytö (1994): The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. I: Studies in Early Modern English. Dieter Kastovsky (red.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 59-77.

Deutscher, Guy (2000): Syntactic change in Akkadian: The evolution of sentential complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer (1991): Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. University of Chicago Press.

Juge, Matthew L. (2007): Metaphor and teleology do not drive grammaticalization. I: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. Joseph C. Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith (red.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.284.05jug.

Klein, Raymond M. & Jean Saint-Aubin (2016): What a Simple Letter- Detection Task Can Tell Us About Cognitive Processes in Reading. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25(6), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416661173.

Koch, Peter (2016): Meaning change and semantic shifts. I: The Lexical Typology of Semantic Shifts Päivi Juvonen & Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm (red.). Berlin: De Gruyter, 21–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377675-002.

Kövecses, Zoltan (1997): In search of the metaphor system of English. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics 11, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.26262/ISTAL.V11I0.6715.

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson (1980): Metaphors we live by (6. udg.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Matisoff, James A. (1991): Areal and Universal Dimensions of Grammatization in Lahu. I: Approaches to Grammaticalization II. Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (red.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 383–453.

Matthews, Peter H. (2014): The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics, 3. udg. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Mole, Christopher (2024): Attention. I: The Standard Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (red.). Stanford: Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2024/entries/attention/ (tilgået efterår 2024).

Moravcsik, Julia E. & Alice F. Healy (1995): Effect of meaning on letter detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21(1), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.82.

Pereira, Dulce G., Anabela Afonso & Fátima Melo Medeiros (2015): Overview of Friedman’s test and post-hoc analysis. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation 44(10), 2636–2653. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2014.931971.

Sanford, Anthony J. (2002): Context, attention and depth of processing during interpretation. Mind & Language 17(1–2), 188-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00195.

de Vries, Clarissa, Gudrun W. Reijnierse & Roel M. Willems (2018): Eye movements reveal readers’ sensitivity to deliberate metaphors during narrative reading. Scientific Study of Literature 8(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.18008.vri.