Når en ø er fremmed land: Danskeres bedømmelse af ekstraktion fra relativsætninger i engelsk som andetsprog

Abeillé, A., B. Hemforth, E. Winckel & E. Gibson (2020): Extraction from subjects: Differences in acceptability depend on the discourse function of the construction. Cognition 204: 104293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104293.

Allwood, J. (1976): The Complex NP Constraint as a non-universal rule and some semantic factors influencing the acceptability of Swedish sentences which violate the CNPC. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2.

Berwick, R.C., P.P. Pietroski, B. Yankama & N. Chomsky (2011): Poverty of the stimulus revisited. Cognitive Science 35, 1207–1242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01189.x.

Chaves, R.P. & M.T. Putnam (2020). Unbounded dependency constructions: Theoretical and experimental perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, N. (1973): Conditions on transformation. I: A festschrift for Morris Halle, S.R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (red.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. 232–286.

Chomsky, N. (1982): Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (1995): The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Christensen, K.R., J. Kizach & A.M. Nyvad (2013a): Escape from the island: Grammaticality and (reduced) acceptability of wh-island violations in Danish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9210-x.

Christensen, K.R., J. Kizach & A.M. Nyvad (2013b): The processing of syntactic islands – An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26, 239– 251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.08.002.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2014): On the nature of escapable relative islands. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586514000055.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2019): No escape from the island: On extraction from complement wh-clauses in English. I: The sign of the V – Papers in honour of Sten Vikner. K.R. Christensen, H. Jørgensen & J.L. Wood (red.). Aarhus: Dept. of English, School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University. 95–112. https://doi.org/doi:10.7146/aul.348.91.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2022): The island is still there: Experimental evidence for the inescapability of relative clauses in English. Studia Linguistica 76, 684–708. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586514000055.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2023): Økuller? Det er ikke altid lige (u) acceptabelt at forlade en indlejring. I: MUDS 19. K. Boas, I.S. Hansen, T.T. Hougaard & E.L. Overgaard. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitet. 77–92.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2024): Complexity, frequency, and acceptability. Glossa 9, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.10618.

Chung, S. & J. McCloskey (1987): Government, barriers and small clauses in Modern Irish. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 173–237.

Cinque, G. (1990): Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Deane, P. (1991): Limits to attention: A cognitive theory of island phenomena. Cognitive Linguistics 2, 1–64. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1991.2.1.1.

Engdahl, E. (1982): Restrictions on unbounded dependencies in Swedish. I: E. Engdahl & E. Ejerhed (red.). 151–174.

Engdahl, E. (1997): Relative clause extraction in context. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 60, 51–79.

Engdahl, E. & E. Ejerhed (red.) (1982): Readings on unbounded dependencies in Scandinavian languages. Umeå: Universitetet i Umeå.

Erteschik-Shir, N. (1973): On the nature of island constraints. Ph.d.-afhandling, MIT.

Erteschik-Shir, N. (1982): Extractability in Danish and the pragmatic principle of dominance. I: E. Engdahl & E. Ejerhed (red.). 175–192.

Fanselow, G. & S. Frisch (2006): Effects of processing difficulty on judgments of acceptability. I: Gradience in Grammar: Generative Perspectives. G. Fanselow, C. Fery & M. Schlesewsky (red.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. 291–316.

Goldberg, A.E. (2005): Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hansen, E. (1984). Dæmonernes port: Støttemateriale til undervisningen i nydansk grammatik. 3. udg. København: Reitzel.

Hansen, E. & L. Heltoft (2011): Grammatik over det danske sprog. København: Det danske sprog- og litteraturselskab.

Hofmeister, P. & I.A. Sag (2010): Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86, 366–415. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0223.

Ionin, T., & S. Montrul (2010): The role of L1-transfer in the interpretation of articles with definite plurals in L2-English. Language Learning 60, 877–925. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00577.x.

Jensen, A. (1998): Knudekonstruktioner – en syntaktisk, semantisk og pragmatisk analyse af sætningsknuder i dansk. Speciale, Københavns Universitet.

Kiparsky, P. & C. Kiparsky (1970). Fact. I: Progress in linguistics: A collection of papers. M. Bierwisch & K.E. Heidolph (red.). Berlin: De Gruyter. 143–173.

Kuno, S. (1976): Subject, theme, and the speaker’s empathy: A re-examination of relativization phenomena. I: Subject and Topic. Charles N. Li (red.). New York, NY: Academic Press. 417–444.

Kush, D. & F. Lindahl (2011): On the escapability of islands in Scandinavian. Konferencepræsentation, 85th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Pittsburgh, PA.

Kush, D., A. Omaki & N. Hornstein (2013): Micro-variation in Islands? I: Experimental syntax and island effects. J. Sprouse & N. Hornstein (red.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. 239–265.

Kush, D., T. Lohndal & J. Sprouse (2018): Investigating variation in island effects: A case study of Norwegian wh-extraction. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 36, 743–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-017-9390-z.

Kush D., C. Sant & S.B. Strætkvern (2021): Learning island-insensitivity from the input: A corpus analysis of child- and youth-directed text in Norwegian. Glossa 6, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.5774.

Kush, D., A. Dahl & F. Lindahl (2023). Filler–gap dependencies and islands in L2 English production: Comparing transfer from L1 Norwegian and L1 Swedish. Second Language Research. Online udg. før tryk. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583231172918.

Lindahl, F. (2017): Extraction from relative clauses in Swedish. Ph.d.-afhandling, Göteborg Universitet.

Mikkelsen, K. (1894): Dansk sproglære, med sproghistoriske tillæg: Haandbog for lærere og viderekomne. København: Lehman & Stages Forlag.

Müller, C. (2019). Permeable islands. A contrastive study of Swedish and English adjunct clause extractions. Ph.d.-afhandling, Lunds Universitet.

Müller, C. & C.U. Eggers (2022): Island extractions in the wild: A corpus study of adjunct and relative clause islands in Danish and English. Languages 7, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020125.

Nyvad, A.M. & K.R. Christensen (2023): Hvis, da og fordi ekstraktion fra adverbielle ledsætninger var mulig. Ny forskning i grammatik 30, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.7146/nfg.v1i30.137960.

Nyvad, A.M., C. Müller & K.R. Christensen (2022): Too true to be good? The non-uniformity of extraction from adjunct clauses in English. Languages 7, 244. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040244.

Nyvad, A.M., K.R. Christensen & S. Vikner (2017): CP-recursion in Danish: A cP/CP-analysis. The Linguistic Review 34, 449–477. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlr-2017-0008.

O’Neill, R., E. Cornelius & G. Washburn (1981): American kernel lessons: Advanced students’ book. New York, NY: Longman Publishing Group.

Phillips, C. (2013a): On the nature of island constraints I: Language processing and reductionist accounts. I: Experimental syntax and island effects. J. Sprouse & N. Hornstein (red.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 64–108.

Phillips, C. (2013b): On the nature of island constraints II: Language learning and innateness. I: Experimental syntax and island effects. J. Sprouse & N. Hornstein (red.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 132–158.

Poole, G. (2011): Syntactic theory. Houndsmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Poulsen, M. (2008): Acceptability and processing of long-distance dependencies in Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 31, 73–107. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586508001832.

Pullum, G.K. & B.C. Scholz (2002): Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. The Linguistic Review 18, 9–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.19.1-2.9.

Ross, J.R. (1967): Constraints on variables in syntax. Ph.d.-afhandling, MIT.

Simons, M. (2007): Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117, 1034–1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2006.05.006.

Sprouse, J. (2007): Continuous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 1, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.5964/bioling.8597.

Sprouse, J., I. Caponigro, C. Greco & C. Cecchetto (2016): Experimental syntax and the variation of island effects in English and Italian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34, 307–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-015-9286-8.

Tutunjian, D., F. Heinat, E. Klingvall & A.-L. Wiklund (2017): Processing relative clause extractions in Swedish. Frontiers in Psychology 8, 2118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02118.

Vikner S., K.R. Christensen & A.M. Nyvad (2017): V2 and cP/CP. I: Order and structure in syntax I: Word order and syntactic structure. L.R. Bailey & M. Sheehan (red.). Berlin: Language Science Press. 313–324.

White, L. (2003): Second language acquisition and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wiklund, A.-L., K. Bentzen, G.H. Hrafnbjargarson & Þ. Hróarsdóttir (2009): On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119, 1914–1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2009.03.006.