Sætningskompleksitet, frekvens og acceptabilitet

Anderssen, M. & M. Westergaard (2010): Frequency and economy in the acquisition of variable word order. Lingua 120, 2569–2588. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.06.006.

Bader, M. & J. Häussler (2010): Toward a model of grammaticality judgments. Journal of Linguistics 46, 273–330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990260.

Bastiaanse, R., G. Bouma & W. Post (2009): Linguistic complexity and frequency in agrammatic speech production. Brain and Language 109, 18–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.12.004.

Bell, A. m.fl. (2009): Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language 60, 92–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.06.003.

Bornkessel, I., M. Schlesewsky & A.D. Friederici (2002): Grammar overrides frequency: Evidence from the online processing of flexible word order. Cognition 85, B21–B30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00076-8.

Boye, K. m.fl. (2023): Agrammatism in a usage-based theory of grammatical status: Impaired combinatorics, compensatory prioritization, or both? Journal of Neurolinguistics 65. 101108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2022.101108.

Bybee, J. (2007): Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001.

Bybee, J.L. & D. Eddington (2006): A Usage-based Approach to Spanish Verbs of “Becoming”. Language 82, 323–355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2006.0081.

Bybee, J.L. & P.J. Hopper (red.). (2001): Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.45.

Caplan, D. (2015): Aphasia. I: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. J.D. Wright (red.). Oxford: Elsevier, 818–821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.54001-X.

Chomsky, N. (1995): The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Chomsky, N. (2001): Derivation by phase. I: Ken Hale: A Life in Language. M.J. Kenstowicz (red.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1–52.

Christensen, K.R., J. Kizach & A.M. Nyvad (2013a): Escape from the Island: Grammaticality and (Reduced) Acceptability of wh-island Violations in Danish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42, 51–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-012-9210-x.

Christensen, K.R., J. Kizach & A.M. Nyvad. (2013b): The processing of syntactic islands – An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26, 239–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2012.08.002.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2014): On the nature of escapable relative islands. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37, 29–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0332586514000055.

Christensen, K.R. & A.M. Nyvad (2023): Frequency, animacy, structural complexity, and acceptability. Ms. indsendt til bedømmelse.

Clifton, C. & L. Frazier (1989): Comprehending Sentences with Long-Distance Dependencies. I: Linguistic Structure in Language Processing. G.N. Carlson & M.K. Tanenhaus (red.). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Bind 7, 273–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2729-2_8.

Collins, C. (1994): Economy of Derivation and the Generalized Proper Binding Condition. Linguistic Inquiry 25, 45–61.

Culicover, P.W. & P.M. Postal (red.) (2001): Parasitic gaps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Damasio, A.R. 1992. Aphasia. The New England Journal of Medicine 236, 531–539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199202203260806.

Diderichsen, P. (1946): Elementær dansk Grammatik. København: Gyldendal.

Ellis, N.C. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in second language acquisition 24, 143–188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024.

Engberg-Pedersen, E. m.fl. (2005): Dansk funktionel lingvistik: en helhedsforståelse af forholdet mellem sprogstruktur, sprogbrug og kognition. Københavns & Roskilde: Københavns Universitet, Handelshøjskolen i København, Roskilde Universitetscenter. https://lingvistkredsen.ku.dk/pdf/dfl/ DFL-bog.pdf.

Engdahl, E. (1983): Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 5–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868088.

Fanselow, G. m.fl. (red.) (2006): Gradience in Grammar: Generative perspectives. Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274796.001.0001.

Featherston, S. (2008): The Decathlon Model of Empirical Syntax. I: Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives. S. Kepser & M. Reis (red.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 187–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.187.

Francis, E. (2021): Gradient acceptability and linguistic theory. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898944.001.0001.

Friedmann, N. (2001): Agrammatism and the psychological reality of the syntactic tree. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 30, 71–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005256224207.

Garnham, A. m.fl. (1982): Slips of the tongue in the London-Lund corpus of spontaneous conversation. I: Slips of the Tongue and Language Production. A. Cutler (red.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 251–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110828306.251.

Greenbaum, S. (1996): The Oxford English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haegeman, L. (1994): Introduction to government and binding theory. 2. udg. Oxford: Blackwell.

Harley, T.A. (2014): The psychology of language: from data to theory. 4. udg. Hove: Psychology Press.

Hawkins, J.A. (1994): A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hawkins, J.A. (1999): Processing complexity and filler-gap dependencies across grammars. Language. Linguistic Society of America 75, 244–285. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/417261.

Hawkins, J.A. (2004): Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Huang, C.-T.J. (1982): Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation. http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:403106:7/component/escidoc:403105/chinese_huang1982_o.pdf.

Jost, E. & M.H. Christiansen (2016): Statistical Learning as a Domain-General Mechanism of Entrenchment. I: Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. H.-J. Schmid (red.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 227–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110341423-011.

Kempen, G. & K. Harbusch. (2008): The Relationship between Grammaticality Ratings and Corpus Frequencies: A Case Study into Word Order Variability in the Midfield of German Clauses. I: Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives. S. Kepser & M. Reis (red.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 329–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197549.329.

Kristensen, S.A. (2015): Infinitte ledsætninger. I: 15. Møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog (MUDS 15). Y. Hansen, Inger Schoonderbeek & T.T. Hougaard (red.). Aarhus: Institut for Kommunikation og Kultur, Aarhus Universitet, 197–216. https://projekter.au.dk/fileadmin/projekter/Muds.dk/rapporter/MUDS_15.pdf.

Lee, J. & C.K. Thompson. (2011): Real-time production of arguments and adjuncts in normal and agrammatic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes 26, 985–1021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.496237.

Mehl, M.R. m.fl. (2007): Are Women Really More Talkative Than Men? Science 317, 82–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139940.

Meltzer-Asscher, A. & C.K. Thompson (2014): The forgotten grammatical category: Adjective use in agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 30, 48–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.04.001.

Mikkelsen, K. (1911): Dansk ordföjningslære med sproghistoriske tillæg. Håndbog for viderekomne og lærere. København: Lehman & Stages Forlag.

Myers, J. (2017): Acceptability Judgments. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.333.

Müller, C. & C.U. Eggers (2022): Island Extractions in the Wild: A Corpus Study of Adjunct and Relative Clause Islands in Danish and English. Languages 7. 125. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7020125.

Newmeyer, F.J. (2005): Possible and probable languages: a generative perspective on linguistic typology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Nyvad, A.M. & K.R. Christensen (red.). (2023): Recent Advances in Research on Island Phenomena. Basel: MDPI. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/books978-3-0365-6317-6.

Nyvad, A.M., J. Kizach & K.R. Christensen (2014): (Non-)Arguments in Long-Distance Extractions. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 44, 1–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9300-z.

Nyvad, A.M., C. Müller & K.R. Christensen (2022): Too True to Be Good? The Non-Uniformity of Extraction from Adjunct Clauses in English. Languages 7. 244. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/languages7040244.

Pallier, C., A.-D. Devauchelle & S. Dehaene (2011): Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 2522–2527. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1018711108.

Pickering, M.J., M.J. Traxler & M.W. Crocker (2000): Ambiguity Resolution in Sentence Processing: Evidence against Frequency-Based Accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 447–475. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2708.

Pincott, J.E. (2012): Slips of the Tongue. Psychology Today. https://www. psychologytoday.com/intl/articles/201203/slips-the-tongue. (17 marts, 2023).

Pinker, S. (2004): Clarifying the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 31, 949–953. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000904006439.

Poole, G. (2011): Syntactic theory. 2. udg. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Schmid, H.-J. (2016): 1. A Framework for Understanding Linguistic Entrenchment and Its Psychological Foundations. I: Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning. H.-J. Schmid (red.). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 9–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110341423-002.

Schmid, H.-J. (2016): A Framework for Understanding Linguistic Entrenchment and Its Psychological Foundations: 1. A Framework for Understanding Linguistic Entrenchment and Its Psychological Foundations, 9–36. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110341423-002.

Schütze, C.T. 1996. The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Sprouse, J. (2013): Acceptability Judgments. Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199772810-0097.

Sprouse, J. & D. Almeida (2017): Setting the empirical record straight: Acceptability judgments appear to be reliable, robust, and replicable. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40. e311. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000590.

Thornton, R. & S. Crain (1994): Successful Cyclic Movement. Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar. T. Hoekstra & B.D. Schwartz (red.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 215–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/lald.8.11tho.

Togeby, O. (2003): Fungerer denne sætning?: funktionel dansk sproglære. København: Gad.

Tomasello, M. (2003): Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

White, A.S. & K. Rawlins (2020): Frequency, acceptability, and selection: A case study of clause-embedding. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5. 105. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1001.

Yang, C.D. (2004): Universal Grammar, statistics or both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 451–456. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.006.

Zipf, G.K. (1935): The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.