Computationel Literacy in Schools
Cognitive, social and material aspects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v8i13.149529Resumé
This conceptual article is situated in the cross-section between computer science and didactics. The article contributes to the research field by taking on questions regarding the role of materialities in relation to learning computational literacy in school. Computational literacy is here defined as patterned deployment of skills and dispositions that are applied in a technology-mediated and situated context with the aim of achieving a valued goal.
The article sets out with a brief outline of the emergence of computational literacy as a concept. Then moving on through a more in-depth presentation of the concept in which three intertwined aspects, the cognitive, the social, and the material, unfold. The article concludes with two examples of computational literacy in a school, and how materiality here plays an important role in relation to the subject-content and pedagogical approach.
Referencer
Andersen, T. (2010). Den digitale revolution: Fortællinger fra datalogiens verden. Datalogisk Institut, Københavns Universitet.
Brennan, K. (2015). Objects To Think With. Constructivist Foundations, 10(3), 313-314.
Brennan, K. & Resnick, M. (2012). New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. 25.
Bers, M. U. (2021). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom (Second edition). Routledge.
Caeli, E. N., & Yadav, A. (2019). Unplugged Approaches to Computational Thinking: A Historical Perspective. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00410-5
Caeli, E. N. (2021). Computational Thinking in Compulsory Education: Why, What, and How? A Societal and Democratic Perspective. PhD Dissertation. Graduate School Arts, Aarhus University.
Caspersen, M. E. (2022). Informatics as a Fundamental Discipline in General Education: The Danish Perspective. I H. Werthner, E. Prem, E. A. Lee, & C. Ghezzi (Red.), Perspectives on Digital Humanism (s. 191-200). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86144-5_26
Caspersen, M. E., Iversen, O. S., Nielsen, M., Hjorth, A.,& Musaeus, L. H. (2018). Computational Thinking – Hvorfor, hvad og hvordan? It-vest – samarbejdende universiteter.
Danholt, P., & Gad, C. (2021). Videnskab, teknologi og samfund: En introduktion til STS / Peter Danholt og Christiopher Gad. Hans Reitzel.
Denning, P. J. & Tedre, M. (2019). Computational thinking. The MIT Press.
DiSessa, A. A. (2001). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy (1. paperback ed). The MIT Press.
Dindler, C., Smith, R. C. & Sejer Iversen, O. (2019). En designtilgang til teknologiforståelse. Dafolo
Dohn, N. B., Hansen, J. J., & Hansen, S. B. (Red.). (2020). Designing for situated knowledge transformation. Routledge.
Dohn, N. B., Mitchell, R., & Chongtay, R. (Red). (2021). Computational thinking: Teoretiske, empiriske og didaktiske perspektiver. Samfundslitteratur.
Dohn, N.B. (2021). Computattional Thinking – indplacering i et landskab af it-begreber. I Dohn, N. B., Mitchell, R., & Chongtay, R. (Red). Computational thinking: Teoretiske, empiriske og didaktiske perspektiver. Samfundslitteratur.
Dourish, P. (2017). The Stuff of Bits: An Essay on the Materialities of Information. MIT Press.
Fischer, C., Frøkjær, E. & Gedsø, L. (1972). Datalære i skolen—Om data og edb i samfundet. G.E.C. Gads Forlag.
Hachmann, R. (2020). Didactic Design for Transformations of Subject-content Knowledge: An investigation of student teachers’ transformations of subject-content knowledge between professional education and practice [PhD Dissertation]. University of Southern Denmark.
Hachmann, R. (2022a). The Cyber Weapon: Decomposing Puzzles in Unplugged Computational Thinking Practices with Computational Objects. KI – Künstliche Intelligenz, 36, 59-68. DOI:10.1007/s13218-022-00756-8
Hachmann, R. (2022b). Cybervåbnet: computational praksis i 8. klasse. I: S. S. Fougt, J. Bundsgaard, T. Hanghøj & M. Misfeldt (red.), Håndbog i Scenariedidaktik (p. 489-501). Didaktiske studier Nr. 8. Aarhus Universitetsforlag. DOI:10.2307/j.ctv33jb48k.37
Gee, J. P. (2015). The new literacy studies. I J. Rowsell & K. Pahl (Red.), The Routledge Handbook of Literacy Studies (1. udg., s. 35-48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717647
Goldstien, H. H. & von Neumann, J. (1947) Planning and coding of problems for an electronic computiong instrument. The Institute for Advanced Study
Princeton, New Jersey
Grover, S. & Pea, R. (2013). Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051
Haigh, R. W. (1985). Planning for Computer Literacy. The Journal of Higher Education, 56(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.2307/1981664
Hansen, J. J. (Red.). (2018). Digital skrivedidaktik. Akademisk Forlag.
Hicks, D. & Beaudry, M. C. (Red.). (2010). The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford University Press.
Jacob, S. R., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Computational Thinking and Literacy. Journal of Computer Science Integration, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.26716/jcsi.2018.01.1.1
Jensen, L. (2001). Den frygtelige hånd. Høst & Søn.
Kafai, Y. & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in a Digital World. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Kafai, Y. B., Peppler, K. A. & Chapman, R. N. (Red.). (2009). The Computer Clubhouse: Constructionism and creativity in youth communities. Teachers College Press.
Kafai, Y. B., & Proctor, C. (2021). A Revaluation of Computational Thinking in K-2 Education: Moving Toward Computational Literacies. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211057904
Kiær, K., Godtliebsen, A., Lorenzen, R.F., Nielsen L. & Nissen, A. (2020). Har vi fanget et monster? 09.06.22: https://xn--tekforsget-6cb.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/fanget-et-monster-1.kl_.-dansk-15.09.20.pdf
Kragelund, M. & Otto, L. (Red.). (2005). Materialitet og dannelse: En studiebog (1. udgave). Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag.
Lu, J. J. & Fletcher, G. H. L. (2009). Thinking about computational thinking. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 41(1), 260-264. https://doi.org/10.1145/1539024.1508959
Madsen, O.L., Møller-Pedersen, B. & Nygaard, K. (1993). Object-Oriented Programming in the BETA Programming Language. Addison-Wesley.
Maloney, J., Resnick, M., Rusk, N., Silverman, B. & Eastmond, E. (2010). The Scratch Programming Language and Environment. ACM Transactions on Computing Education, 10(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1868358.1868363
Mikkonen, J. (2019). Bodygramming. Embodying the computational behaviour as a collective effort. The Design Journal, 22, 1423-1437.
Mikkonen, J. (2021). Kropsbaseret Computational Thinking. I N. B. Dohn, R. Mitchell, & R. Chongtay (Red.), Computational Thinking – Teoretiske, empiriske og didaktiske perspektiver. Samfundslitteratur.
Molnar, A.R. (1979). The Next Great Crisis in American Education: Computer Literacy. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 7, 275-285.
Naur, P. (1965). The Place of Programming in a World of Problem, Tools, and People. Information processing 1965, 195-199.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books
Papert, S. (1987). Information technology and education: Computer criticism vs. technocentric thinking. Educational Researcher, 16(1), 22-30
Resnick, M., Maloney, J., Monroy-Hernández, A., Rusk, N., Eastmond, E., Brennan, K., Millner, A., Rosenbaum, E., Silver, J., Silverman, B., & Kafai, Y. (2009). Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779
Selander, S. & Kress, G. (2012). Læringsdesign – I et multimodalt perspektiv. Frydenlund.
Slot, M. F., Hachmann, R., Hjorth, M., & Von Sehested, M. (2021). Teknologiforståelse - en sammenhængende faglighed: En beskrivende analyse af 110 undervisningsforløb. Learning Tech, 10, 296-322. https://doi.org/10.7146/lt.v6i10.125600
Soon, W. & Cox, G. (2020). Aesthetic programming: A handbook of software studies. Open Humanities Press.
Tannert, M., Lorentzen, R. F. & Berthelsen, U. D. (2021). Computational Thinking as Subject Matter. I A. Yadav & U. D. Berthelsen. (Red). Computational Thinking in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003102991-5
Tucker, D., McCowan, F., Deek, C., Stephenson, J., Jones, J. & Verno, A. (2006). A model curriculum for k-12 computer science: Report of the acm k-12 task force computer science curriculum committee. Technical report, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.
Christensen, O. & Tufte, B. (2010) Pædagogik, didaktik og levende billeder – En introduktion. I Martin Brandt-Pedersen, Ole Christensen, & Henrik Poulsen. (2010). Læring med levende billeder. Samfundslitteratur.
Tuhkala, A., Wagner, M.-L., Iversen, O. S. & Kärkkäinen, T. (2019). Technology Comprehension – Combining computing, design, and societal reflection as a national subject. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 20, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2019.03.004
Undervisningsministeriet. (2018). Læseplan for forsøgsfaget teknologiforståelse. https://www.emu.dk/sites/default/files/2019-02/GSK.%20L%C3%A6seplan.Tilg%C3%A6ngelig.%20Teknologiforst%C3%A5else.%20pdf.pdf
Undervisningsministeriet. (1990). EDB i folkeskolens fag: Dansk og EDB Undervisningsvejledning for folkeskolen. Undervisningsministeriet.
Wagner, M.-L., Iversen, O. S. & Caspersen, M. E. (2020). Teknologiforståelses rationale: På vej mod coputational empowerment i den danske grundskole. Unge Pædagoger, 81(1), 6-14.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2010). Computational Thinking: What and Why? Link Magazine, 6. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/papers/TheLinkWing.pdf
Yadav, A. & Berthelsen, U. D. (Red.). (2022). Computational thinking in compulsory education: A pedagogical perspective (First Edition). Routledge.
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Forfatterne og Læremiddel.dk.
Må ikke bruges kommercielt.
