Dialing in with participants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7146/journalistica.v19i1.158053Resumé
Journalistica: The Methods Section
In this section, Journalistica puts a spotlight on research methods used in journalism studies and/or journalism practice.
Referencer
Belzile, J. A., & Öberg, G. (2012). Where to begin? Grappling with how to use participant interaction in focus group design. Quali-tative Research, 12(4), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111433089
Blanchett, N., Mellado, C., Brin, C., Nemat Allah, S., & Vallender, C. (2023). Is It Us or Them? The Challenge of Getting Journalists to Participate in Academic Research. Journalism Studies, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2023.2216796
Bredal, A., Stefansen, K., & Bjørnholt, M. (2022). Why do people participate in research interviews? Participant orientations and ethical contracts in interviews with victims of interpersonal vio-lence. Qualitative Research, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941221138409
Busch Nicolaisen, P. (2022). A State of Emergency or Business as Usual in Climate Science Communication? A Three-Dimensional Perspective on the Role Perceptions of Climate Scientists, Cli-mate Journalists, and Citizens. Science Communication, 44(6), 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470221136220
Clark, T. (2010). On ‘being researched’: why do people engage with qualitative research? Qualitative Research, 10(4), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794110366796
Daly, J. A. (2011). Personality and Interpersonal Communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Inter-personal Communication (Fourth Edition, pp. 131–167). SAGE Publications Inc.
Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The Space Between: On Being an Insider-Outsider in Qualitative Research. International Jour-nal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800105
Halkier, B. (2010). Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qual-itative Research, 10(1), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348683
James, D. C. S., Harville, C., Efunbumi, O., Babazadeh, I., & Ali, S. (2017). “You Have to Approach Us Right”: A Qualitative Framework Analysis for Recruiting African Americans Into mHealth Research. Health Education & Behavior, 44(5), 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198117727324
Kristensen, G. K., & Ravn, M. N. (2015). The voices heard and the voices silenced: recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies. Qualitative Research, 15(6), 722–737. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114567496
Losi, L. (2023). Who engages with science, and how? An empirical typology of Europeans’ science engagement. Public Understand-ing of Science, 32(6), 798–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231164340
Merriam-Webster. (2025, May 17). Cold call. Merriam-Webster.Com. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cold%20call
Nicolaisen, P. B. (2024). Orchestrating the climate choir: the boundaries of scientists’ expertise, the relevance of experiential knowledge, and quality assurance in the public climate debate. Climatic Change, 177(3), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-024-03697-3
Peek, L., & Fothergill, A. (2009). Using focus groups: lessons from studying daycare centers, 9/11, and Hurricane Katrina. Qualita-tive Research, 9(1), 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794108098029
Ray, V. (2017). Journalists and Scholars: A Short Manifesto. In L. Barkho (Ed.), Towards a Praxis-based Media and Journalism Re-search (1st edition, pp. 15–22). Intellect Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36xvz8k.4
Scott, S., Hinton-Smith, T., Härmä, V., & Broome, K. (2012). The re-luctant researcher: shyness in the field. Qualitative Research, 12(6), 715–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112439015
Thomas, M., Bloor, M., & Frankland, J. (2007). The process of sample recruitment: an ethnostatistical perspective. Qualitative Re-search, 7(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107082300
Traianou, A. (2018). Ethical Regulation of Social Research Versus The Cultivation of Phrónēsis. In N. Emmerich (Ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Conduct and Governance of Social Science Research (Vol. 3, pp. 163–177). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000003010
Traianou, A. (2020). The Centrality of Ethics in Qualitative Prac-tice. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Re-search (2nd edition, pp. 86–110). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190847388.013.12
Vicsek, L. (2007). A Scheme for Analyzing the Results of Focus Groups. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 6(4), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690700600402
Downloads
Publiceret
Citation/Eksport
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Copyright (c) 2025 Peter Busch Nicolaisen
Dette værk er under følgende licens Creative Commons Navngivelse (by).
Forfattere, der publicerer deres værker via dette tidsskrift, accepterer følgende vilkår:
- Forfattere bevarer deres ophavsret og giver tidsskriftet ret til første publicering, samtidigt med at værket er omfattet af en Creative Commons Attribution-licens, der giver andre ret til at dele værket med en anerkendelse af værkets forfatter og første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere kan indgå flere separate kontraktlige aftaler om ikke-eksklusiv distribution af tidsskriftets publicerede version af værket (f.eks. sende det til et institutionslager eller udgive det i en bog), med en anerkendelse af værkets første publicering i nærværende tidsskrift.
- Forfattere har ret til og opfordres til at publicere deres værker online (f.eks. i institutionslagre eller på deres websted) forud for og under manuskriptprocessen, da dette kan føre til produktive udvekslinger, samt tidligere og større citater fra publicerede værker (se The Effect of Open Access).
